Hackers Target MySpace and Facebook
Stony Stevenson writes "The security firm Fortify Software has warned against a series of attacks against Facebook and MySpace. Buffer overflows that enabled hackers to exploit the Aurigma ActiveX image uploading software used by social networking sites were at the heart of the assault. 'Criminal hackers now view social networking sites as their best target for attacks ... [partially because] such sites are designed to be usable by "unsophisticated" consumers, meaning that the barrier to entry for attacks is potentially lower as users are more likely to click on a link that leads to malware.'"
I assume this is an internet explorer based exploit? http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/776931
(received as a comment on my page this morning)
We figured out a long time ago that it's easier to elect seven judges than to elect 132 legislators.
Cable, telco and banks and apparel vendors all have young people in their sites. Predatory lending credit cards, special internet "deals" with students and massive advertising budgets that should make the companies involved blush, are aimed at people ages 14 to 25.
Why? because that's where the money is.
Why do the theives use ActiveX exploits? Because they can.
Sheep, meet Mr. Slaughter. Mr. Slaughter .... gross!
Oh man, a slashbot troll's dream -- do I start ranting about myspace and their userbase or do I start ranting about activex?
Unlike some sites I visit regularly, I've never been goatse-ed on Myspace... :)
We figured out a long time ago that it's easier to elect seven judges than to elect 132 legislators.
And with the way that people spew out personal information on Facebook and MySpace, they probably figure that if they get it just right, there's the potential to hit the motherload of information for identity theft.
Hackers? I remember hacky sacks from when I was a kid! Are these the same thing? *clicks link to find out*
Is a goatse different than puckering, making a faux 'thoughtful' face with hand on chin, and making a gang-style hand sign that means nothing a dozen times into the webcam with poor lighting in the photo gallery?
I can't really tell the difference.
Laughter is the Spackle of the Soul.
Not really much threat of goatse images, but a signficant threat of arbitrary remote code execution for Windows users.
512 MB RAM, 20 GB disk, 200 GB transfer, five datacenters. $19.95/month.
I've had seven different passwords and they've got them all so far.
512 MB RAM, 20 GB disk, 200 GB transfer, five datacenters. $19.95/month.
May I mention that hacking Facebook takes no real effort? Simply manipulating a browser's client side input forms (using Firebug, maybe) allows one to post to any Superwall (Faceboo application) whether you are the person's friend or not. Anonymous attakers could put links posing as coming from people's friends on the people's Superwalls. Reasoning: If it comes from my friend, it must be good and safe. The click-rate becomes much higher, and an attacker has just used a form of social engineering to lead people to a malware site. Most applications are not built with security in mind. They just (fatally) assume that the end user would never do such a thing. Dream on, app developers!