Slashdot Mirror


Internet Explorer 8 Beta Features Revealed

Admodieus writes "It seems as though the veil has been lifted on the Internet Explorer 8 beta. Microsoft has revealed a list of the new features in IE8, including two interesting new additions called Activities and WebSlices. From the site: 'Activities are contextual services to quickly access a service from any webpage. Users typically copy and paste from one webpage to another. Internet Explorer 8 Activities make this common pattern easier to do ... WebSlices is a new feature for websites to connect to their users by subscribing to content directly within a webpage. WebSlices behave just like feeds where clients can subscribe to get updates and notify the user of changes.' Also aboard the upgrade train is automatic crash recovery, a favorites toolbar, and improved phishing filter protection. Microsoft has also posted links to download the beta, but none of them are working right now."

27 of 281 comments (clear)

  1. SVG by ccguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sorry to see that there's no SVG support.

    As for what _is_ there, well, most of the pages are broken, unavailable ("This project is not yet published"), so if the public documentation is any indication of the development status I'd say IE8 it pretty closed to the usual MS standard :-)

    1. Re:SVG by pilgrim23 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This from a "user" not a developer:
      I just this last week tried IE 7 for the very first time. As a user of IE 6, Opera, Firefox, Safari, and having used Every browser from lynx Cello and Mosaic up through the offerings of today, I am not unfamiliar with various browser styles, feel, ways of doing things. From my early experience with it, I can say that 7... to use a standard automobile analogy: The engineer is 5' 2". He designed the seat fixed in one position and not adjustable. The rearview mirror fixed in positon as well; Seat belt? forget it! He likes the parking brake in the back seat so that's how it is going to be.
      Microsoft seems to have an irrepressible arrogance when it comes to design. They also seem to have a less then stellar competence in other areas. The former seems to be a fall back for lack ehibited in the later. IE 8 is from the same designers? No thank you

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    2. Re:SVG by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Interesting
      A lot of large companies and institutions appear reluctant to finally bury Internet Explorer 6.


      It's not always that they don't want to get rid of IE6 but rather, they can't because of their own web pages which have been hacked to work in IE6 or, as in my case, have applications that use a web interface and won't work with IE7 (or anything else).

      I wish the folks who I work for would allow more people to install FF but we're a Microsoft-only place and so installing FF, or any other unapproved software, is verboten. Except in the case of where I work which fortunately is somewhat lenient in this regard. So long as we keep it updated, no problems.

      The last place I worked for (and left) has a zero-tolerance policy towards anything not Microsoft. Not too long after I left orders came down that anyone who had FF was to remove it. Immediately. Or else.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    3. Re:SVG by ianare · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Uh, wouldn't having an unchanging interface make a window easier to forge? You can just grab a screenshot of IE7, having full confidence it will look exactly the same for everyone.
      Maybe you are referring to the little dropdown that shows up in pop up dialogs?

    4. Re:SVG by Plunky · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not everyone wants a customisable interface with thousands of widgets and doohickeys.

      No, but millions of people want to turn off the one thing that annoys them, and for each of those people its a different thing..

  2. Broken links in the summary by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can download the latest browser from here: www.microsoft.com/IE8/download

  3. Hmmm ... by Der+Einzige · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Those features sound suspiciously like Mac OS X's Services menu and Web Clip widget. Not that there's anything wrong with that ...

  4. Crash recovery, eh? by religious+freak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Also aboard the upgrade train is automatic crash recovery Kind of funny, you'd think they'd work on not making it crash. Or at least spin it a little better.
    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    1. Re:Crash recovery, eh? by J0nne · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also aboard the upgrade train is automatic crash recovery Kind of funny, you'd think they'd work on not making it crash. Or at least spin it a little better. Firefox has the same feature too. Browsers have to accept tons of different types of input (html, js, css, different image formats, ...) and try to make sense of it all. Third-party extensions and plugins can cause the browser to crash.

      I hate Microsoft as much as the next guy, but that was low, even for Slashdot.
    2. Re:Crash recovery, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Kind of funny, you'd think they'd work on not making it crash. Unlike Firefox, I haven't had IE crash at all in the past 4 years.

      Oh yeah, that's because I haven't used IE in the past 4 years. :-)
    3. Re:Crash recovery, eh? by Z34107 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm never greeted with a new toolbar.

      How do people do this to their computers? You're reading/posting to slashdot, so I assume you're technically competent.

      Even when I was using Internet Explorer 6, I never had this problem. I've had one virus the entire time I've used Windows (since 3.11) - and that was some file infecting virus I got on Windows 98 from who-knows-where. (Although I suspect my younger brother-knows-where, but I digress.)

      Never had toolbars, and pop-ups stopped when I got IE7 (beta 1.) But, somehow, people manage to trash their Windows boxes, and trash them regularly.

      How did you manage this? What sites did/do you browse? What horrible Bonzi-buddy software do you use on your computer? I'd like to know what the rest of my extended family (the ones who think I'm free 24-hour technical support) is doing.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
  5. WOW! by quaketripp · · Score: 5, Funny

    First they introduced tabbed browsing, now they've upgraded the context menus and integrated feeds! I just don't know how anyone can keep up with them. OMG and they're integrating group policy options to block sites! finally! that was impossible to do on a firewall! viva la revolution!

    1. Re:WOW! by MrNemesis · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, we can at least be thankful that they didn't move the "back" button to the bottom right hand corner, remove the option to configure connection settings from within the app itself, reverse the direction of scrolling (i.e. scroll right and left to go up and down and vice versa), raster bitmaps and GIF files in CMYK as opposed to RGB and turn sentences begining with prepositions into French swearing. All these new UI paradigms we're missing out on!

      In a rare moment of originality, a young MS exec, having just read the hitch hikers guide, sent a binary of IE7 back in time in an attempt to sue the companies developing firefox, opera and a million and one other more inventive browsers in the future for copying IE's features. Unfortunately, the court dismissed the new IE interface as a crude hoax perpetrated by 4chan, and the budding young exec was made Ballmer's personal chair man.

      Not that I think the IE7 interface is an abomination of consistency and style or anything ;)

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
  6. Will someone please... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...tell Microsoft that we don't give a flying hoot about Activities and Internet Julian Fries. As developers, we want to know if they'll support CSS2 (and God-forbid even some CSS3 *gasp!*), DOM2, SVG, ECMAScript 3rd Edition, and half-a-billion other standards that they've been ignoring. If they want to make developers really happy while future-proofing their browser, they'll support HTML5 and ECMAScript 2.0.

    I'm not holding my breath, though.

    1. Re:Will someone please... by GregChant · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you read the article, you'd have noticed the linking page, Everything a developer needs to know, which explains IE8's CSS2.1 compliance (with provisional CSS3 compliance), among other developer-related information. It's hard to be indignant and informed, I know.

    2. Re:Will someone please... by crush · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And not just the above, but the "WebSlices" crap is just another way to muddy the Atom/RSS waters. We do NOT need another feed "standard" thanks.

  7. It'll all end in tears.... by caluml · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Users typically copy and paste from one webpage to another. Internet Explorer 8 Activities make this common pattern easier to do ... Oh god. This sounds just like the "Hey, let's let the email client run scripts", and "Let's hide the nasty, confusing file extensions from the users" decisions.
    Some things should just be a little tricky to do. Like saving a file from an email, locating it, (chmod u+x in *nix), and only then executing it.
  8. un, effing, real. by sootman · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is hysterical. 'WebSlices' are similar to Safari's Web Clip feature. Crash Recovery... aka Session Restore in Firefox. (And Saft gives it to Safari.) And can anyone decipher the marketing BS that somehow says the Links bar is new? In Internet Explorer 7, the Links bar provided users with one-click access to their favorite sites. The Links bar has undergone a complete makeover for Internet Explorer 8. It has been renamed the Favorites bar to enable users to associate this bar as a place to put and easily access all their favorite web content such as links, feeds, WebSlices and even Word, Excel and PowerPoint documents. So... it's called a "favorites" bar now so users will think "aha! I can put links to my favorite things here!" rather than the old "links" name which led users to think "aha! I can put links to my favorite things here!"? Ooh, and it can hold links to documents as well? Er, yeah, that makes a lot of sense... I've always felt that the biggest thing missing from a web browser was access to random local documents. Because there aren't enough other ways to access often-needed files.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  9. Safety Filter by losethisurl · · Score: 5, Funny

    We can filter if we want to
    We can leave your friends behind
    'Cause your friends don't filter and if they don't filter
    Well they're no friends of mine

    --
    Seriously, is it supposed to look like that?
  10. the classic joke... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft: "Hey, wait for us - We're the leader!"

    I'm glad they're going to be supporting all these 'new' standards. :)

  11. AJAX Navigation Support by jeremyds · · Score: 5, Insightful
    One of the more interesting features included with IE8 is "Ajax Navigation":

    AJAX Navigation enables users to navigate back and forth without leaving the AJAX application and could be used navigating a page without performing a traditional full navigation. This allows websites to trigger an update to browser components like the address bar by setting the window.location.hash value, firing an event to alert components in the page and even creating an entry in the travel log. This is actually a proposed standard in the HTML 5 specification and it's nice to see Microsoft implementing it. The inability to bookmark or navigate to a page that's been updated using AJAX has always been a pain in the ass.
    1. Re:AJAX Navigation Support by nevali · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've built sites in the past fortnight which use document.location.hash to allow navigation to/from different AJAXified or otherwise dynamic sections of a page (either by typing the URL with the anchor directly, or by using back/forward), and it works wonderfully in every browser I've tried including IE 6.

      About the only "clever" bit here is firing an event automatically when it changes, which just removes the three lines of code I have checking whether window.location.hash is myfoo.savedHash or not in an interval ticker. ...and they turned this into a whole complete feature, and got somebody to think up a name for it?!

  12. ACR by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 4, Informative

    The "Crash Recovery" actually seams to be quite good, better than Firefox anyway, if its implemented well, it means each tab runs in a separate thread (although for some reason they called them processes) and can crash/recover separately, as well as implementing the standard session restore.

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    1. Re:ACR by Skuto · · Score: 4, Informative

      >it means each tab runs in a separate thread (although for some reason they called them processes)

      Processes and threads are vastly different things.

      For example, one thread crashing means all other threads in the same process go down with it.

      This is probably exactly why they use processes instead of threads.

  13. Whats with all the change? by flowpoke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems that with each major version, they (and most other folks) try to reinvent everything and cloud it with branding. NO ONE enjoys radical change with little to no benefit. The interface needs to be more transparent, not cluttered with new terminology and features that matter NONE when compared to things like speed, stability and security.

    I don't think MS will ever get it...

  14. From a developer perspective by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 5, Informative
    From a designer's perspective, IE7 is a huge improvement over IE6. They fixed really a lot of the css problems, to the point that, if I am careful, I can write a site that is both css/xhtml valid and renders properly in IE7 (even with a css-only drop menu). No hacks or anything. The new version of Trident (IE's rendering engine) isn't perfect, but it's much better.

    They also finally implemented png alpha channel, which lets us overlay images such as logos with nice, smooth, aliased edges. To get an idea of the difference this makes, compare these two logos: Alpha channel support also allows people to do some other nice looking effects, such as drop shadows, with little fuss.

    Unfortunately, the people who designed the IE7 UI appear to have been retarded monkeys. The result is that now, almost 2 years after its release, almost a third of my users are still on IE6. Personally, that is really frustrating.

    I am not optimistic about MS's commitment to continue to improve standards compliance in IE8. It does not support svg, as somebody already pointed out, nor will it support E4X, which is going to hobble AJAX development.
    --
    weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    1. Re:From a developer perspective by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The result is that now, almost 2 years after its release, almost a third of my users are still on IE6. Personally, that is really frustrating.

      Actually, that's probably not the reason people are still on IE6. I work for a major Fortune 500 company, and we are all still on IE6. This post is brought to you on IE6. Why? Because businesses, especially large ones where all the people are, are really cautious to adopt new technologies. They want to be sure they will work with all the custom software they've written. In our case, some programs depended on very IE6 specific things, or were hacks of some sort, so we are STILL on IE6, and that's all that is supported here. And as a web developer, I have to develop in IE6 so I can see what my users will see. I would love to upgrade, but can't until the company moves us all forward. So that's probably why you have so many IE6 hits; anyone on a laptop issued by a large corporation is probably still using it.

      --
      Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.