When Should We Ditch Our Platform?
odoketa writes "My organization recently had to replace our Web developer. It took us an extremely long time to find someone with the necessary skill set. I don't know if this is because of the platform we are running (which I will leave nameless), or simply because the fates conspiring against us. It's easy to assume that languages or platforms are popular based on buzz, but the rubber hits the road when you have to hire someone to maintain that code. How are folks out there determining when you've backed the wrong horse, and getting back on track?"
Stop using FORTRAN. It really wasn't built for the web, you know.
It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
- E. Debs
How do you expect Slashdot readers to tell you whether to ditch your platform unless they know whether it is Microsoft or not?
Fortran works better than anything else on punch cards.
Engineering is the art of compromise.
Right now seems like the perfect time to get yourselves a new platform, preferably something easy to maintain.
I used to carry a bottle of whiskey for snake bite. And two snakes. -Nefarious Wheel
we train monkeys to shout 1's and 0's at computers. The Monkeys are happy.
And I recommend Ruby on Rails. Its developer community has been growing exponentially, from 5 guys in 2006 to 10 guys in 2007. If you are extra conservative, you can try Groovy on Rails. It's just like Java, but better.
i highlighted "When Should We Ditch Our Platform?" but IntelliSense doesn't have any suggestions
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
"I've found that the more a manufacturer hypes a product the more likely it is to be a flash in the pan...
--
When is the last time you hadn't thrown your vote away? Ron Paul even if its write-in!"
The Irony is... overwhelming.
If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
when Microsoft "embraces" the platform.
Skot Nelson music is my saviour / i was maimed by rock and roll
Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
The developers convinced the management that they needed to use some god-awful platform? It's like you're working in some evil alternate universe!
Badass Resumes
Pick me! I weigh less!
- think of an add "wanted: lean, mean programmers, that are worth their weight in gold"
- We pick the small ones, they cost less.
As of Postgres v6.2, time travel is no longer supported.
Deleted
Or for Oracle/Peoplesoft
(And no, AS/400 is not the name of an obscure Linux distro, and RPG does not mean "role playing game" or even "rocket propelled grenade"--it's much worse than that...)
"Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
Cold Fusion.
..but the rubber hits the road when you have to hire someone to maintain that code...Soon as I heard this I envisioned pointy hair.
Weaselmancer
rediculous.
The rubber hits the road when you back the wrong buzzing horse off a running platform that's not on the right track, and have to ditch it.
I love business metaphors.
You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
You know, the rest of your post would have been somewhat reasonable, but this part ruined it all. There was absolutely nothing in the GP post that should have posed the slightest difficulty for a competent system administrator to understand.
I'm going to choose to believe you were exaggerating for effect.
Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
Roll a d20 and consult the correct chart.
"We should do the next project in Rails."
"Nonsense, we only have one engineer who knows Rails and would need ten."
"Hire them."
"Nonsense, they make 20% more than you do."
"I guess I should be doing Rails elsewhere, then."
Help poke pirates in the eyepatch, arr.
bzzt! Illegal use of "more good".