Slashdot Mirror


German Police Raid 51 CeBIT Stands Over Patent Claims

LeCaddie writes "Last week German investigators raided 51 exhibitor stands at CeBIT, the German information technology fair in Hanover, looking for goods suspected of infringing patents. Some 183 police, customs officers, and prosecutors raided the fair on Wednesday and carried off 68 boxes of electronic goods and documents including cellphones, navigation devices, digital picture frames, and flat-screen monitors. Of the 51 companies raided, 24 were Chinese. Most of the patents concerned were related to devices with MP3, MP4, and DVB standard functions for digital audio and video, blank CDs, and DVD copiers, police said." In the US there are no criminal penalties associated with patents, and such a raid could not be conducted, especially in the absence of a court ruling of infringement.

14 of 191 comments (clear)

  1. Re:HA-HA by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Guess that's the last time there'll be another IT fair in Germany. It's been this way for years, it's kind of a ritual. Somehow I doubt it's contributed significantly to Cebit's decline.
  2. Re:Software patents? by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1, Informative

    Considering the EU has a Constitution, free travel from member state to member state, free trade within I would say it could be considered a country.

    --
    The game.
  3. Re:Software patents? by gweihir · · Score: 4, Informative

    I thought software patents were illegal in Europe.

    It is not about software patents. It is about embedded devices (hence not "computers") with a specific functionality profile. At least German law enforcement has not yet grasped that a phone can actually have software downloaded into it and so not all functionality is "hardcoded". Also a device can be in violation of "Musterschutz" (something like the "look" part from "look and feel"), by closly following the design of an other device.

    Side note: MP3 as a method or as an encoder/decoder is not protected, but the parameter set used is (as far as I understand this). As to the CDs, these were likely counterfit, i.e. claiming a different manufacturer. That is trademark infringement. DVD copier could be classified as "circumvention device" for copy protection shemes, which are illegal in Germany. (I know, I know, lawmakers with no grasp of technology...)

    My guess is that this raid will actually result in no or very little prosecution. But the displays have been removed, so the patent holders are satisfied. Unfortunately it will be very difficult to get any compensation for the damage done, even if equipment was seized in error.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  4. Re:Software patents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    You still need a passport for traveling between (european) countries... We're not there yet...

  5. Re:HA-HA by eggnoglatte · · Score: 4, Informative

    I read another report that said it was about product piracy (fake iPhones etc.). I find that version easier to believe, since AFAIK patents are a purely civil matter across Europe. And you can bet your ass that if it was piracy-related, the same could happen in the US as well. Here in Canada/Vancouver, we had similar raids last summer on some open air markets where police were cracking down on vendors selling fake Prada purses and the like.

  6. Re:HA-HA by Xelios · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yeah, from what I can gather from the various online German news outlets reporting on this the target of the raid was counterfit products, not patent violations. Booths belonging to Chinese companies were selling blatant iPhone ripoffs, like Meizu Technology's "MiniOne", and the police shut them down.

    --
    Murphey's fighting Occam, and we're in the stands.
  7. Re:HA-HA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Booths belonging to Chinese companies were selling blatant iPhone ripoffs, like Meizu Technology's "MiniOne", and the police shut them down. Well, at least in the case of Meizu, the reason was apparently not the iPhone ripoff.

    http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/05/meizus-cebit-booth-shut-down-over-mp3-licensing-issues-not-the/
  8. Re:There are German companies with IP behind this by jeti · · Score: 2, Informative

    No. Thompson manages the patents for the Fraunhofer institute.
    They have nothing to do with this. Sisvel manages another stack
    of patents that they claim to be relevant to the mp3 format.

    Apparently, the most important of those patents is for a padding
    bit. The idea is to add zeros to a VBR file so that a CBR only
    decoder can handle the file.

  9. Re:MiniOne by fastest+fascist · · Score: 3, Informative

    'course, you can probably also forget about things like warranties or safety testing.

  10. The summary got it wrong by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1, Informative

    This was about counterfeiting, not patent violation. Quite ridiculous as well if you ask me, but the Polizei does not raid yet for patent violations.

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  11. Re:MiniOne by onefriedrice · · Score: 5, Informative

    You're ignorant (no offense) if you think the quality of Chinese rip-offs comes close to the real products. I've spent the last two years in Asia, in a country where such fake products are plentiful. I bought a "Sony" discman for part of my stay there. It wasn't so bad since I could just take it to some local, hole-in-the-wall electronics shack and they could fix whatever electronic components had failed while I waited (which occurred fairly regularly), but there is no way any product like that would be put-up with by most Americans, with or without access to a cheap electronic repair outlet. I won't argue with you whether or not real, brand-name electronics have been reduced in quality over the past years (I think they have), but in no way do they approach the shoddy quality (both interior and exterior) of the fake stuff, believe me.

    --
    This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
  12. The summary got it RIGHT by kju · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, actually you got it wrong. It was acknowledged by law enforcement officials that the raid was about patents. From http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/104657:

    Auslöser für die Aktion waren den Angaben der Staatsanwaltschaft zufolge Strafanzeigen der Rechteinhaber. Bei der Razzia sei es vorwiegend um Patente für Datenkompressionsverfahren, DVB-Standards und DVDs gegangen, sagte Kriminaloberrat Oliver Stock, der die Aktion koordiniert hatte und sich über einen "erfolgreichen Abschluss" freute.

    Bad translation (by me):

    According to the public prosecutors office complaints by holders of rights were reason for the action. Law enforcement senior councillor Oliver Stock who coordinated the action and was glad about the "successfull completion" said target of the raid where mainly patents for data compression, DVB standards and DVDs.

    There were some initial (wrong) reports that reason for the raid was counterfeiting (iPhone look-a-likes) but these reports were later corrected, see for example http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/104591 (in english).

  13. Re:HA-HA by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
    Does it say iPhone, or have an Apple logo on it?

    It runs Windows Mobile, it's a look-alike, not a counterfeit.

    It's about MP3 patents, not Apple.

    http://www.meizume.com/ : "According to forum posts by Meizu CEO Jack Wong, the raid was initiated by Sisvel due to the lack of a Sisvel (patent holder of MP3 format) license."