Slashdot Mirror


10,000-website Strong Malware Maze Created by Criminals

Stony Stevenson passed us an ITnews article about the newest scam in online crime. Some 10,000 web pages have been rigged by IT-minded criminals, with the aim of hijacking unsuspecting PCs. The site reports that the users are redirected through a maze of malware, all with the goal of gaining access to personal user information. "The reprogrammed web pages are probably victims of an automated attack that included scanning the internet for unsecured servers and planting a piece of JavaScript code that redirects to a site in China to serve up the malware. The malware cocktail attempts to exploit vulnerabilities in Windows, RealPlayer and other applications to break into the PC. A back door also allows the subsequent installation of additional malicious programs. McAfee Avert Labs first spotted the attack on 12 March. 'Of the 10,000 pages that were compromised a number have already been cleaned up,' the firm stated."

15 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. Another oblig by esocid · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's a trap!

    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    1. Re:Another oblig by LMacG · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or for us older folk:

      You are in a maze of twisty little web pages, all alike.

      --
      Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
  2. Including Slashdot? by davidwr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe not today, but tomorrow?

    Seriously, it's time to seriously sandbox web browsers and have "no extensions" by default with overrides on a per-page, per-session basis allowed.

    In addition to sandboxing, browsers should ship with NoScript or equivalent functionality built-in.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Including Slashdot? by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In addition to sandboxing, browsers should ship with NoScript or equivalent functionality built-in.

      Most of the sites that most of the average public uses are heavy on Javascript. A web browser shipped without support for JS by default is not going to win many users.

  3. We should make vbscript the standard... by syntaxeater · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...then we wouldn't be having these problems.

  4. The Question Webmasters Have Is... by ausoleil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...how do we check our sites to ensure that this code has not been planted. The article gives no clue at all. It doesn't even identify if is platform or technology specific, etc. Just that someone else has set up a huge botnet.

    Even sysadmins and webmasters that use best practices and diligently patch, etc. can be gotten because there are always undisclosed holes that are utilized. In fact, were I in that game and I figured out something to defeat security, it would keep it under my ragged black hat and never share that info.

  5. Great Threat Research by metalman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Often you hear warnings about not going to untrusted sites," said Craig Schmugar, threat researcher at McAfee Avert Labs... That is good advice, but it is not enough. Even sites you know and trust can become compromised."

    In the old days it was easy to avoid malicious sites. Now even your neighbor could be the terrorist... err..I mean.. even sites you know and trust can become compromised.

    At least this threat researcher offered a calm analysis with plenty of advice about how to avoid such attacks without recoiling from the web in fear.

    MUST BUY MCAFEE...

  6. It is pitch black. by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    You are likely to be eaten by a script kiddie.

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  7. NoScript is a no-go by ivan256 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not just disallow redirection and loading of off-domain/off-host data from scripts?

    Disabling scripts entirely disables dangerous behavior, sure... But is also disables lots of desirable functionality that most people want.

    1. Re:NoScript is a no-go by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Interactive code can't be run on the server and still be responsive enough for a good user experience.

      Web pages aren't just static content anymore. And other than stuffy people who don't want to let go of the paper document, or paper document + hyperlink models, nobody really thinks they *should* be static content either.

  8. Obligatory criticism of the use of 'obligatory' by spun · · Score: 4, Funny

    From now on, whenever someone posts something they claim is 'obligatory,' we should point out, "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." Dueling memes, what fun!

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  9. Isn't this the obvious result .... ? by King_TJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First, people figured out that in order to hijack people's PCs for "bot net" purposes, they could try to trick them into installing a program that would slip it in, along with the desired program being loaded. But along came all the "spyware cleaner" packages, that could identify and remove the malware, leaving the originally desired software installed and running.

    So the next trick was to try to make removal difficult or impossible by infecting a PC with a "downloader virus". That way, the virus itself would try to avoid detection, but silently download and install spyware from various sites around the world. The user might figure out he/she was infected with the spyware and try to clean it with a remover, but it would keep coming right back, as the original virus kept re-downloading the stuff.

    This led to popular anti-virus packages starting to blur the lines between spyware and virii (in cases where the company in question didn't have a specific anti-spyware product ready to sell you). They'd just attempt to clean ALL of the stuff up. Others wanted you to run 2 distinct programs together to protect against both types of threats. In any case, all of this confused a lot of people -- but also made them catch on that a lot of this stuff appeared to be impossible to clean ONLY because of that "downloader trojan horse" trick.

    After they started "wising up" and unplugged their Inet connections while doing all the virus and spyware removal ... the "evil doers" had to escalate things further.

    The current ploy of injecting the stuff from normally benign web sites is pretty much the "next logical step" for them. Doesn't surprise me a bit. I think we'll continue to see more and more of this, too. After all, this attack has several vectors. DNS server entries could be spoofed, redirecting people to fake sites. Web servers with security flaws could be compromised, and modified code loaded directly onto them. Or maybe, legitimate sites will unwittingly host infected ad banners down their pages, paid for by "advertisers" with motives other than really caring if you view the ad's visible content?

  10. can anyone tell me the checksum of the code? by 3seas · · Score: 5, Informative

    I discovered my site had a directory and just under 2500 pages added to it. The directory and file dates are January 9th 08 and every one of the html files has the same script code in it. My research turned up indication of two mass site hacks in January.

    A google search for threeseas.net/blogger/log/cache/ (cache being the directory that contained the files [past tense]) shows up about 4500 site pointing to one of the files in that directory. Some of the findings are even sourceforge sites and you can tell they have been hacked as well. In other words there are a lot of hacked sites besides mine.

    I notified google this morning and my host has already removed the files from my site as the owner and group were set that I couldn't do this myself.

    anyways rather that posting the code, a check sum would be better of the code starting with teh word "function" to the end of the code.

  11. Re:Impressive! by IBBoard · · Score: 4, Funny
    And for anyone who is unfortunate enough not to know Eddie Izzard or who hasn't seen "Dress to Kill", the section is:

    And Hitler ended up in a ditch, covered in petrol, on fire, so, that's fun! I think that's funny, 'cause he was a mass-murdering fuckhead. And that was his honeymoon as well! Double trouble!

    "Eva, let's marry."

    "Where should our honeymoon be?"

    "Well, in a ditch, covered in petrol, on fire. I've already arranged it upstairs."

    "Oh, how romantic, Adolf."

    "Yes, I thought!"

    Fun! What a bastard! And he was a vegetarian, and a painter, so he must have been going, "I can't get the fucking trees... Damn! I will kill everyone in the world!"

    And he was a mass-murdering fuckhead, as many important historians have said. But there were other mass murderers that got away with it! Stalin killed many millions, died in his bed, well done there; Pol Pot killed 1.7 million Cambodians, died under house arrest at age 72, well done indeed! And the reason we let them get away with it is because they killed their own people, and we're sort of fine with that. "Ah, help yourself," you know? "We've been trying to kill you for ages!" So kill your own people, right on there. Seems to be... Hitler killed people next door... "Oh... stupid man!" After a couple of years, we won't stand for that, will we?
    Pol Pot killed 1.7 million people. We can't even deal with that! You know, we think if somebody kills someone, that's murder, you go to prison. You kill 10 people, you go to Texas, they hit you with a brick, that's what they do. 20 people, you go to a hospital, they look through a small window at you forever. And over that, we can't deal with it, you know? Someone's killed 100,000 people. We're almost going, "Well done! You killed 100,000 people? You must get up very early in the morning. I can't even get down the gym! Your diary must look odd: "Get up in the morning, death, death, death, death, death, death, death - lunch- death, death, death - afternoon tea - death, death, death - quick shower..."

    So I suppose we're glad that Pol Pot's under house arrest... you know, 1.7 million people. At least he - we know where he is - under house arrest! Just don't go in that fucking house, you know? I know a lot of people who'd love to be under house arrest! They bring you your food... "Just stay here? Oh, all right. (singing laconically ) Have you got any videos?" You know, you just sit there all day... And Pol Pot was a history teacher. And Hitler was a vegetarian painter. So... mass-murderers come from the areas you least expect it. I don't know how the flip comes over, but it happens.


    http://www.auntiemomo.com/cakeordeath/d2ktranscription.html#history
  12. Save us by DiscoLizard · · Score: 5, Funny

    McAfee Avert Labs described the assault as "one of the largest attacks to date of this kind".

    The attack serves as a reminder that even trusted websites can be malicious, McAfee warned.

    "Often you hear warnings about not going to untrusted sites," said Craig Schmugar, threat researcher at McAfee Avert Labs."That is good advice, but it is not enough."

    McAfee Avert Labs first spotted the attack on 12 March.



    I wonder who can sell us some sort of software to guide us out of this maze of evil webpages?