Slashdot Mirror


A New Concept in Supercomputers

Steve Kerrison writes "With the power of CPUs ever-increasing and the number of cores in a system increasing too, having a supercomputer sit under your desk is no longer a pipe dream. But generally speaking, the extreme high end of modern computing consists of a big ugly box housing that generates a lot of noise. A UK system integrator has developed a concept PC that blows that all away. The eXtreme Concept PC (XCP) has quite a romantic design story, with inspiration coming from concept cars and the sarcophagus-like Cray T90. The end result is a system that resembles a Cylon — computing power never looked so ominous. Although just a concept, the company behind the design reckons there could be a (small) market for the systems, with varying levels of compute power accompanied by appropriate (say, LN2) cooling."

14 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. Bad Childish Design by Iskender · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If this is good design, then I do *not* want to see bad.

    1. Re:Bad Childish Design by xarak · · Score: 4, Funny

      Überparent never said it would be at the same time...

      --
      Atheism is a non-prophet organisation
    2. Re:Bad Childish Design by Original+Replica · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I do *not* want to see bad.

      Too bad here it is.
      Perhaps this is more to your liking? Or this.
      Any computer company that wants to have "elegant design" associated with their product needs to realize that plastic is unelegant. Notice how most high end cars try to hide all the plastic in the interior. Yes Apple has done some non-hideous things with white plastic, but outside of the modernism design genre plastic is bad. I would think that some of the engineered wood companies (mostly they make laminate wood flooring) could produce some quite attractive cases for reasonable cost.

      --
      We are all just people.
    3. Re:Bad Childish Design by SmokeyTheBalrog · · Score: 4, Funny

      Supercomputers aren't about "cheap", they're about having the speed and power to crush the other kids.

      There, fixed your post for you.

  2. No thanks. by jschen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't need the very best computer, but if I needed/wanted the best, cost be damned...

    That's hardly something that would fit under my desk. And there's no discussion of performance specs, just a bunch of hype. Besides, with serviceability taking a back seat, you won't be able to upgrade the thing readily, probably making it at the top of its game only for a few months.

  3. It'd be nice.. by arpad1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ..if there were some performance figures. I don't give that much of a damn how it looks if it runs like a son of a gun.

    --
    Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  4. Not by any means a 'supercomputer' by Junta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a high-end dual socket box that incorporates cooling that is probably quieter than equivalent air cooling. It has nothing to do with the visions of 'supercomputer' and the word supercomputer itself is always a relative term. In 1993, the top supercomputer had 60 gigaflops, with a theoretical of 131 gigaflops. This system has a theoretical of 102 gigaflops and probably can get 80-85 gigaflops measured, so it would manage to beat the number 1 supercomputer of 15 years ago.

    Nowadays, the most recent list has the #500 supercomputer at nearly 6 teraflops (rpeak of 10 teraflops). Or, to quantify, the lowest of the top 500 is still 100 times more powerful than one of these boxes.

    Supercomputer in your palm, supercomputer in the desk, as long as you get to pick the year by which you declare what a 'supercomputer' is, you can declare whatever you want.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  5. Re:How practical is it? by chill · · Score: 4, Informative

    If I was spending $20K U.S. on a PC like that, hard drives would be in a separate case, RAID and connected via a SAN. They generate too much heat and vibration and need to be separate from the main electronics. Ditto for optical drives. Once you start moving up the food chain in computing, storage is usually a separate beast.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  6. What has happened to /.? by DAldredge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FTA :"A further six months were spent on manufacturing a working prototype. The system was initially slated to use Intel's maligned V8 platform, but was later changed to the current Skulltrail - incorporating two quad-core CPUs natively running at 3.2GHz on a motherboard that supported four graphics cards - when the design became available.: Since when is that a modern supercomputer?

  7. wow by darkwhite · · Score: 4, Funny

    Reminds me of the Badonkadonk land cruiser.

    Seriously, that design is stupendously atrocious. It looks like a blood-stained crib. There are a lot of ways to present modern server form factors in sexy ways; this is not one of them.

    --

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]
  8. That's Just a Casemodded PC, Not a Supercomputer by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Insightful
    That's not a supercomputer at all. It's just a casemodded,liquid cooled, 2-x86 CPU PC with 4 graphics cards:

    The system was initially slated to use Intel's maligned V8 platform, but was later changed to the current Skulltrail - incorporating two quad-core CPUs natively running at 3.2GHz on a motherboard that supported four graphics cards - when the design became available.


    The only thing any supercomputer has to do with that machine is that the vendor's tech director bought an old Cray:

    A little-known fact is that Armari's technical director, Dan Goldsmith, being the eccentric chap he is, bought a decommissioned Cray supercomputer - used in the Cold War - a while back. Cray's extra-large computers (by today's standards) required some serious cooling, as you would expect, and Cray engineered some class-leading liquid cooling to keep the voluminous beast operating within tolerances.

    Dan has used the inspiration from Cray's research, and indeed the coolant itself, which works in a temperature-range of -110C through to 90C, as a base for the XCP (eXtreme Concept Prototype) - the total immersion model.


    I bet my P4/4.3GHz non-super computer is faster than that old Cray. And there's no way a single 2*4*x86+4*GPU PC is a supercomputer at all.

    And that case is hella ugly.
    --

    --
    make install -not war

  9. Piece of shit by Aaron+Isotton · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's an ugly overpriced piece of shit. 10000 GBP (that's about 20000$) for a dual quad core running at 3.2 GHz in an ugly case? Come on. You can get a Mac Pro with the same speed for a *fourth* of the price. And it looks better.

    When a computer is four times more expensive than the equivalent from *Apple*, then you know that something is seriously wrong.

  10. Re:Supercomputers? by morcheeba · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... not until they invent the gigantic desk!

  11. not a supercomputer by wap911 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    this is much better [reported prior on /.] http://gravity.phy.umassd.edu/ps3.html 16 PS3 cell processors for approximately 400 nodes and not a bad price 16 * $500us or $8000 [less if you can stand ebay]