Identifying Manipulated Images
Jamie found a cool story at MIT Tech Review. (As an aside, it sits behind an interstitial ad AND on 2 pages: normally I reject websites that do that, but it's a slow news day, so I'm letting it through.)
Essentially, software is used to analyze light patterns in still photographs. Once you can figure out where the light sources are, it becomes a lot easier to determine if an image has been photoshopped.
Duh!
this post is now diamonds!
I can tell just by looking at the pixels and cause ive seen a lot of 'shops.
This bodes ill for all those geeks out there with "out-of-state" girlfriends!!
How amazed would you be to suddenly find that you just forgot what I wrote and you needed to reread my post.... again.
*Somewhere in the middle of the NSA / MI6 buildings, a check mark is put next to an IP address.*
Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
I love how the first comment is asking if the apollo landing photos were photoshopped.
Elvis is always spotted in 7-11.
Easily masked light sources (hint: they're everywhere!).
I record my sleeptalking
Yeah, but do they blend?
AT&ROFLMAO
It just sounds wrong to say that an image has been "GIMPed".
Actually, now that I think about it, I kinda like it...
im just tired that "photoshop this" "photoshop that" like there would not be any other image manipulation software
Do you also hang around the Epson at work explaining to people how they aren't really "xeroxing" anything?
sic transit gloria mundi
Playboy is probably the worst offender at this. Most of the women these days are so heavily airbrushed/Photoshopped that they look more like paintings or cartoons than actual photos.
Er... I mean... I just read the articles, but that's what a friend told me about the pictures.
You could probably find out if you googled it.