Beer-Drinking Scientist Debunks Productivity Correlation
austinpoet writes in with a blog post debunking the theory we discussed a few days back that scientists' beer consumption is linearly correlated with the quality of their work. Chris Mack, Gentleman Scientist and beer drinker, has analyzed the paper and found it is severely flawed. From his analysis: "The discovered linear relationship between beer consumption and scientific output had a correlation coefficient (R-squared) of only about 0.5 — not very high by my standards, though I suspect many biologists would be happy to get one that high in their work... Thus, the entire study came down to only one conclusion: the five worst ornithologists in the Czech Republic drank a lot of beer."
beer > coffee/caffeine
Gone!
Scientists Claim there is a direct correlation b/w pot smokers and an amazing talent to link string theory with life on mars
too scared to forget random user names
When bored, hackers write viruses, scientists - papers.
Disclaimer, I am non of the above.
I think what you refer to is known as the "Ballmer Peak" shown on this graph:
Here
Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
This has to be a lost Monty Python sketch, right?
"Flag on the moon. How did it get there?"
More research is needed.
"Ballmer peak" is, FYI, a joke that's going over the heads of all you science-illiterate server monkeys.
If you consume beer through an IV I think you're a different type of drinker.
Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx