Slashdot Mirror


China to Use Silver Iodide & Dry Ice to Control the Weather

eldavojohn writes "While we made light of it before, the MIT Review is taking a serious look at China's plans to prevent rain over their open 91,000 seat arena for The Olympics. From the article: 'China's national weather-engineering program is also the world's largest, with approximately 1,500 weather modification professionals directing 30 aircraft and their crews, as well as 37,000 part-time workers — mostly peasant farmers — who are on call to blast away at clouds with 7,113 anti-aircraft guns and 4,991 rocket launchers.' They plan on demonstrating their ability to control the weather to the rest of the world, and expanding on their abilities in the future."

23 of 387 comments (clear)

  1. Also from the article... by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Following the announcement in 2001 that the 2008 Games had been awarded to Beijing, the government of the People's Republic initiated $40 billion of new construction there, bringing 120,000 Chinese migrant workers into the city (at about $130 each a month) and triggering a five-year steel shortage worldwide. [...] the Geneva-based Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions estimates that 1.5 million of Beijing's natives will have been displaced from their homes by government edict when the Olympics finally begins. This preemptory modernization is of a piece with China's scale, its 1.32 billion population, and the authoritarian control exerted by its Communist central government, which nowadays is dominated by technocrats and engineers who favor mega-projects like the world's largest dam (the Three Gorges dam over the Yangtze River), its highest railway (the Qinghai-Tibet line), and even its biggest Ferris wheel (in Beijing, opening in 2009).

    Someone please try to justify evicting one and a half million people for the Olympics.

    I'm sure someone will try...which just proves that China's subtle information campaigns to attempt to make the world think that everything is rosy or somehow justified are working like a charm.

    1. Re:Also from the article... by sakdoctor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Looking at it from our individualistic perspective, it seems like abused.

      On the other hand, from a Chinese collectivist, 'end's justify the means' perspective, why does it matter if 1.5 million drones are relocated?

    2. Re:Also from the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      New Orleans.

    3. Re:Also from the article... by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Uhhh, New Orleans?

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    4. Re:Also from the article... by Ossadagowah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I already plan to boycott the Olympics because China, which has occupied Tibet and terrorized the citizenry of a sovereign nation and exiled their leader, has no business hosting the world's representation of cooperative spirit shared in friendship and peace.

      --
      anata sekai o kakumei surush ga nai deshou? Anata no susumu michi wa yoi shite arimasu.
    5. Re:Also from the article... by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think anyone would argue with you there, but it still doesn't excuse the abuse of power. So to put up a strawman like that is essentially being an apologist.

      I'm not being an apologist. I'm horrified at some of the actions undertaken by my Government in recent years. But anybody with any sense of objectivity can see that it's not nearly as bad as what's going on in China right now. Or Pakistan. Or Burma. Our people aren't jailed if they speak out against Government policy towards an oppressed/conquered racial group. Our opposition leaders aren't being assassinated. Our Supreme Court isn't under house arrest.

      I will speak out against human rights abuses by any Government, including my own. This idea that we don't have the right to point out abuses in other countries because our own isn't 100% perfect benefits nobody besides the oppressive nations of the World.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  2. Boycott the Genocide Olympics by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Chinese government wants to use the Olympics to inject a dose of normalcy into their demeanor, but there is nothing normal about purposely and continually funding a genocide despite the requests and demands of every other nation in the world.

    1. Re:Boycott the Genocide Olympics by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Chinese government gives the Sudanese government weapons in exchange for oil. The Sudanese government uses those weapons to slaughter civilians in the Darfur region. A representative of the government has actually stating that they delayed a peace agreement to end the north-south civil war in order to make sure they had a "lasting solution in Darfur" (ie, to make sure the region could not recover).

      Saying "Foreign involvement and investment in Sudan might actually be helping the place" is ridiculous. It's like saying that you can send 10,000 pounds of cereal to a corrupt African government and actually expect them to pass the food on to their starving citizens. The reason their citizens are starving is precisely because of government corruption and interference. Those people are never going to see the food if you give it to their government.

      Likewise, expecting a government that is actively slaughtering its people to somehow pass on any of their profits to those same people is ludicrous. The companies you reference are doing business with the government, not with the country's population, and certainly not with any resident of the Darfur region.

  3. control the air by Tim4444 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    now if they could only control pollution...

  4. Isn't silver bad for you???? by madhatter256 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't Silver Iodide bad for you, specifically your skin? I know there's this concoction (that has silver) that if you take too much of it turns your skin blue and is irreversible.

    If china pumps a ton of this stuff out, this will obviously get into the drinking water and then the athletes will drink that water as well as the local citizens and so you get blue skinned Chinese and athletes!

    I think the US, UK, and its allies should boycott the Olympics. Of course I'd like our country to show China that democracy is way better than communism like we did to the Russians back in the hey-day, but China has smog (high levels of mercury and lead than any smog city in the world) and now silver iodide in their drinking water. I wouldn't want our strapping young athletes to end up with lungs like that of a smoker and have asthma attacks.

    --
    Previewing comments are for sissies!
  5. Re:Hmmm... by teknopurge · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Peasant farmers with rocket launchers. Lots of aircraft. What could possibly go wrong? Revolution.
  6. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you look at a list of countries that have hosted the olympic games in modern times, you'll notice that it consists of industrialised nations. By hosting the olympic games, China wants to show the world that they are now a member of the club.

  7. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by AutopsyReport · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Money? And lots of it, I'm sure. Just think of the taxes collected on every penny spent there: airfare, travel, meals, lodgings, souvenirs, equipment, entertainment, and so forth. The Olympics is a giant event with money being poured into all the infrastructure surrounding it.

    --

    For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

  8. Re:China weather control open, US CLOSED! by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Lets say YOU are in charge of a secret government program to try and control the weather. If you needed to conduct these tests would you:

    A. Fly planes and dump chemicals over Cleveland, Ohio. Where any joe sixpack can look up and see the results.
    B. Fly planes in one of the vast territories in which the human population is so sparse that you could walk in a straight line for days before even encountering a road? Or, barring that, the Pacific Ocean?

    Extra Credit!!!!

    For what nefarious purpose is the US government conspiring to control the sunny days in Cleveland?

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  9. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by dcollins · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They gain honor, prestige, and recognition. And if you think those are less important than money... well, there's your cultural divide, right there in a nutshell.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  10. Actually, this is used a lot. by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here in colorado, the lower part of the state has been using Silver Iodide for several years (basically, since the monster drought). This year they had to stop it because they were at 163% of normal. Was it the Silver? Do not know. But where it is not used, the amount is just slightly above 100%. So, it is possible that it is working. Now, what is needed is for us to build more resevoirs or start re-injecting back into the ground, rather than letting our water run off to other states.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  11. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by jotok · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No. Then we would simply accuse the Chinese of genetically engineering athletes (or at least socially engineering them, which is for some reason worse in my mind). That's basically what everyone said about Yao Ming, remember?

    Basically, they can't win for losing. Here are some examples of what the average Westerner thinks of China and the Chinese:

    1. There are a lot of them, and living conditions universally suck (but they don't know it because the Great Firewall won't let them go to those sites)
    2. They pretty much read agitprop all day about crushing enemies of the people, or about doing Taiwan a favor and "reunifying" them, or something.
    3. Most have jobs staffing assembly lines, gleefully turning out ridiculously unsafe products made of things like pure arsenic or asbestos. This includes food products. All of these products are cheap knockoffs of existing products designed in the West (especially the food products)
    4. The rest are goldfarmers or farmers, regular type (i.e., "peasants")
    5. The government universally treats its citizens like crap, unless you are some sort of apparatchik (witness: evictions for the Olympics).

    The Olympics is China's big chance, on the eve of them becoming a superpower, to dispell all of these ridiculous ideas. So far they are not doing especially well, probably because there is a nugget of truth in all of those outlandish preconceptions. They really need some kind of positive media coverage, especially since we're running out of Jackie Chan.

    If they do pull it off, then they look good to the world (which up until now has been ambivalent/suspicious but not as angry as they are with, say, the USA). It would mean that they would have an easier time becoming a superpower and extending their influence. I think their mileage is going to vary, the exposure will be good but they're not going to get away with ANYTHING thanks to the internet.

  12. Re:What does China gain from hosting these? by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do you have a trite list of what the average you thinks of westerners?

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  13. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I mean, if Bush could muster the national purpose to turn an attack by a rogue group into an invasion of not one, but TWO countries, certainly going against the spirit of our own signing of the UN Treaty, then, he could have bent a few rules, and been that figurehead again, and mounted a national effort to rebuild New Orleans.
    Sure, he could, but he shouldn't have to. 9/11 was a failure of the military and intelligence agencies - a federal government responsibility. New Orleans was a failure of the municipality, or, at worst a state responsibility. It was deffinitely a case of the people reaping the fruits of their indifference - if they had bothered to elect a good mayor, and properly fund their police force, the whole situation would have turned out a lot different. The federal government should have never needed to step in, except to provide limited support as requested by the state and municipality.
  14. Re:No, they will not by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not just build a stadium with a roof?

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  15. Cloud seeding has been used in Alberta too by WebCowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    South-central Alberta (between Calgary and Red Deer in Western Canada) is known to be one of the worlds more severe "hail belts". Hail has been responsible for hundreds of millions in damage, ranging from crops and houses (penetrating shingles and shakes to the point of damaging the cladding underneath, as well as causing flooding) to automobiles and airplanes (a hail storm in the Calgary area caused a cargo flight to Minneapolis to abort its ascent when tennis-ball-sized hailstones destroyed the cockpit windscreen of the Boeing 727 jet).

    For the past dozen years, the government has regularly seeded clouds in its hail damage mitigation programme. As a Calgary resident I can say that it has noticeably reduced the frequency and intensity of hail storms, and has probably contributed to millions of dollars in savings in disaster relief and insurance claims.

    Given that this is not only an old practice, but one that occurs frequently around the world, I don't see where the news-worthiness or controversy is in China's application of cloud seeding to divert precipitation from Beijing during Olympic events, aside from the mildly amusing reason behind the project.

  16. Re:No, they will not by MenTaLguY · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hubris.

    --

    DNA just wants to be free...
  17. Re:Bush failed in New Orleans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Well, you could argue that since the leevees that failed were built by the Army Corps of Engineers, the federal government did have at least some of the share of blame.