Slashdot Mirror


Collective Licensing for Web-Based Music Distribution

Two weeks ago we discussed a proposal from music industry veteran Jim Griffin to implement a monthly fee from ISPs in exchange for the legal distribution of copyrighted music. Now, quinthar brings news that Warner Music Group has hired Griffin with the intention to make that proposal a reality. Warner wants Griffin to establish a collective licensing deal with ISPs that would let the ISPs stop worrying about their legal responsibilities for file-sharing while contributing to a pool of money (potentially up to $20 billion per year) that would be distributed amongst the music industry. "Griffin says that in just the few weeks since Warner began working on this plan, the company has been approached by internet service providers 'who want to discharge their risk.' Eventually, advertising could subsidize the entire system, so that users who don't want to receive ads could pay the fee, and those who don't mind advertising wouldn't pay a dime. 'I.S.P.'s want to distinguish themselves with marketing," Griffin says. "You can only imagine that an I.S.P. that marketed a 'fair trade' network connection would see a marketing advantage.'"

2 of 236 comments (clear)

  1. First they came for my mp3s.. by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 4, Funny

    First they came for my mp3s, but I did not download those, so I did nothing.

    Then they came for my tv shows, but I did not download those, so I did nothing.

    Then they came for my porn and I was sunk :(

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  2. In Canada by future+assassin · · Score: 3, Funny

    This fucking idea is so crazy that it just might pass. Thank god I live in Canada where I only have to pay to music companies when ever I want to back up my photos onto a cd from a new photo shoot.

    Wait a minute?!

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*