Slashdot Mirror
The 30 Dumbest Video Game Titles In History
An anonymous reader writes "Not every game involves taking an axe to the head of a criminal; some classics from the 80's involved massacring camels from aircraft, or in the case of "How to Be a Complete Bastard" for the C64, something altogether different(unless you're a camel). CNet has collected the 30 most ridiculous game names and concepts from the last 25 years. Quite frankly, how some of these — including "Touch Dic" from Korea — ever made it onto store shelves is beyond me."
They are different - nothing wrong with ridiculous names.
...which I have yet to find again. (for C64)
/. crowd" you ask? Well, Q*bert-inspired gameplay wasn't modified much, so when penis touched/entered vagina (with a suggestive sound, as far as SID capabilities went) you actually...lost a life.
Basically it was a variant of Q*bert ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q*bert ) where Q*bert was replaced by representation of...penis and enemies by...yep, vaginas.
Why "perfect game for
PS. Frustrating that I can't seem to find it even using the title - Spermen (but I might remember that wrong)
One that hath name thou can not otter
I was a little surprised not to see that one up there.
Then again, it was kind of a pointless list to begin with.
http://caesar.logiqx.com/php/emulator_game.php?id=mame&game=mjegolf Mahjong Erotica Golf.
BULLSHIT! ZOMBIES ATE MY NEIGHBORS IS A GREAT GAME!
Seriously. I like that game. It has nice music too.
The article refers to its levels as being all essentially the same, but that's not really true. There aren't bosses at the end of levels either. I wonder if they actually played the game.
They should make a list of dumb cheats, think it'd be even more amusing than the title names...
I think it was fifteen years ago I last played New Zealand Story, but I'll never forget the cheat.
Since it's a little vulgar I'll just link the cheat code.
Why is that game on the list? What exactly is ridiculous about the name or the concept? I've played and enjoyed it, by the way.
The game title might sound odd but its based off a book of the same name.
... that should have been included, IMO:
- Brad Zoom in "Better Dead than Alien"
- Attack Of The Mutant Zombie Flesh Eating Chickens From Mars (starring Zippo the Dog)
Especially the second (a Spectrum game) is worth mentioning.
A CC-licensed illustrated horror novel
Ah, heh, it's just the mandatory "Top X Worst Y" kind of list, that became popular in the last half a decade or so. You know, so they can show they're hip, smack-talking, unbiased and irreverent like that, and aren't afraid to say it when a game sucked 20 years ago. (Although your mileage may vary a lot if it's a game from this year and from a major publisher.) It's the videogame reviewer version of building up street cred.
On the bright side, at least these guys don't talk too much smack. I've seen too many other such list which sound like the stereotypical pimple-faced 15 year old trying to sound like a wigger gangsta. They get brownie points for not doing that.
On the less bright side, it's as stupid and grasping at straws as any other such list. If you get past the first page, it becoes a lot more hit and miss, and more miss than hit. I'm kinda at a loss to see what's wrong with some of those names. Or why they are worse than a couple thousand other games from that era.
E.g., "Gun Club" may not be the most exciting name or concept, but it's neither stupid nor ridiculous. Plus, it doesn't sound any worse than any other shooting gallery kind of game, so no idea why they singled that one out.
E.g., "Chemist Tycoon" may get extra penalty points for being yet another attempt to cash in on the "tycoon" title. (Personally I'm still waiting for someone to come up with Battlefield Tycoon, and cash in on both;) But honestly it doesn't sound any worse than, say, Shopping Centre Tycoon, Restaurant Tycoon (if I recall its title right) or the two dozen other Tycoon games.
I mean, if you think running a chemist's shop is stupid, picture a buggy simulation of running a restaurant, plus a heavy-handed attempt at a story: that you're fighting to save the world from someone who cornered the market by having cheap prices and good quality. No, seriously, it's not even my interpretation of it, you have the "quest giver" (so to speak) tell you exactly that. So you're fighting to make the world safe again for overpriced and poor quality restaurant owners again, I guess.
E.g., "How To Be A Complete Bastard" may be morally questionable (but then they don't have a problem with GTA too?), but it sounds like it describes the game's content perfectly. And they endorse it as an old game to check out, so it can't have been that dumb a game idea either. As a sidenote, they're also wrong that no similar game has been made ever since. Check out Neighbours From Hell from Jowood.
E.g., "Barbie Horse Adventures" doesn't sound all that exciting for an adult, but, here's the important part, it's a game for little girls. It's not supposed to be Return To Castle Rammstein... err... Wolfenstein. Now I'll give them some slack there, because truly most games for little kids are an abomination, and those for little girls doubly so. But still, I'm curious, is there any reason to single out Barbie Horse Adventures there? I can think of a dozen titles along similarly silly premises for kids, and those didn't seem to make the list. Some even, yes, about riding a pony or caring for a pony. Was Barbie Horse Adventures that much dumber than those? I'm genuinely curious. Or is it something about Barbie that makes that concept dumber than usual?
E.g., Ship Simulator, well, it might not sound that exciting as a concept, but it's also not the worst. Perhaps more importantly, it's not there just because some devs were too retarded to come up with a better game concept. It's actually a training program that only incidentally also got sold as a video game.
But if we're going to include that and Bus Driver, how about Der Planner 3. It's also a training program, only this time for business. And not only it got published as a game, but also got saddled with some of the most uninspired things in history, to make it more game-like. Like it got a sorta Sims-like "at home" mode, except it missed all the points that Sims fans liked in The Sims. Plus a wife which could d
A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
There was only one title from (gaming genius) Jeff Minter: Attack of the Mutant Camels. Personally I think Megagalactic Llamas Battle at the Edge of Time or Sheep in Space would have been better examples of his unconventional naming style. As some have already pointed out some of the game names that made the list make perfect sense when taken in context.
The author's language (and choice of titles, and sense of humor in most of the entries) is full of fail.
Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
'30 worst articles ever posted to Slashdot' list.
As time went by I got a C64, but never did find myself "keeping up" and going to the Amiga. I always thought that Leisure Suit Larry was a great name for a game, but never got to play it.
Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
Penn and Teller once had a game produced, "Desert Bus", in response to complaints that video games were too violent.
The player gets to drive a bus from Tucson, Arizona to Las Vegas, Nevada in real time at a maximum speed of 45mph. The game cannot be paused. The bus contains no passengers. The road is empty. Nothing happens. If the player makes it to Las Vegas, they score one point. Then a supervisor characters shows up and says "You want to pull a double shift?" The player can then drive back to Tucson. On the return trip, it slowly gets dark. That's it.
If you run off the road, the bus stalls, and eventually a tow truck shows up and tows the bus back to the starting point. In real time.
Somebody got six points once. This is believed to be the record.
Adrian Edmondson (From "The Young Ones" TV show) wrote a funny little book called "How be a complete bastard" and this game is an obvious tie-in. I still have that book somewhere and I expect it is still funny and worth reading, unlike this shitty cnet article.
No, it probably isn't very much in comparison to some of the FPSes out there - but then the whole idea is that it is released as a "proof of concept" in the hope that intelligent, constructive people will give both good and bad feedback so that the developers can maybe implement some of those ideas to make it better.
If you don't like it, hell, then don't play it. It's not as though it cost you any money or anything now, is it? But please find the intelligence somewhere within your pea-sized brain to understand that this is how a lot of Open Source development actually works.
If you pay for something and it's crap, you have every right to complain. If you don't pay for something and it's crap (in your opinion) then tell the people who made it or keep your pointless griping to yourself.
Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
Spanky's Quest *smirk*, Frogger: Helmet Chaos *snigger*
What are these guys, like 13 or something?
"Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife