Slashdot Mirror


Griefers Assault Epileptics Via Message Board

An anonymous reader tips us to a story up at Wired reporting on what may be the first computer attack to inflict physical harm on victims. Last Saturday, griefers posted hundreds of bogus messages on the support forums of the nonprofit Epilepsy Foundation that used JavaScript and strobing GIFs to trigger migraines and seizures in users. For about 3% of the 50 million epileptics worldwide, flashing lights and colors can trigger seizures. "'I don't fall over and convulse, but it hurts,' says [an IT worker in Ohio]. 'I was on the phone when it happened, and I couldn't move and couldn't speak.' ... Circumstantial evidence suggests the attack was the work of members of Anonymous, an informal collective of griefers best known for their recent war on the Church of Scientology. The first flurry of posts on the epilepsy forum referenced the site EBaumsWorld, which is much hated by Anonymous. And forum members claim they found a message board thread — since deleted — planning the attack at 7chan.org, a group stronghold."

9 of 621 comments (clear)

  1. ebaums did it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    it was ebaumsworld... they hate us for our freedoms.

    1. Re:ebaums did it! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 0, Troll

      ebaums did it! (Score:1)
      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 29, @05:07PM (#22907052)
      it was ebaumsworld... they hate us for our freedoms.


      No. YOU did it. Just look at your name. Anonymous Coward. That says it all!
  2. Hackers? by Aaron+England · · Score: 1, Troll

    The headline of the news article is "Hackers Assault Epilepsy Patients via Computer", yet all the perpetrators did was troll the message board with offensive links not unlike what happens here daily on Slashdot. The media never could grasp the correct usage of hackers (hackers versus crackers, hackers versus script kiddies, etc), and confusing Anonymous for hackers isn't likely to help.

  3. Re:Smear campaign by Scientology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Camsluts" and "Attention Whores" are not drawn in a negative light. They're terms of endearment.

    Also, tits or GTFO.

  4. YOU DO NOT SPEAK FOR ANONYMOUS by justinlee37 · · Score: 0, Troll

    This attack, as any violent attack, is condemned by Anonymous.

    What are you smoking? Anonymous condones violence all of the time. In fact, Anonymous even condones racial violence. Against niggers.

    Stop acting like Anonymous is a unified organization. It isn't. It's as unified in purpose and philosophy as a bunch of teenage sp00ky kids.

  5. Re:Stop lying, Christ. by Kyokugenryu · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm not a Scientologist, I just don't support all this retarded crap against Scientology. Standing outside is not a "raid" as those Raidchan/insurgents call it. It's a bunch of nerds standing outside a building. It's not bothering anyone most likely. Why would a religion have a reason to be scared of a bunch of kids who think being on 4chan since 2006 makes them an "oldfag" and intentionally making epileptics, who have done NOTHING TO YOU, have seizures? You're saying this like my IRC network wasn't linked to Partyvan for what, 2 months? With all of 7chan/Raidchan/Insurgency. Go back to standing outside of CoS buildings and thinking they care in the least, but leave people with disabilities alone. That is genuinely disgusting, not even the GNAA went that far.

  6. Re:Smear campaign by Scientology by try_anything · · Score: 1, Troll

    Fair Game policy, which states that Scientology critics, or "Suppressive Persons (SPs)", "may be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed."
    So on one side, you have assholes trying desperately to pretend they aren't evil, while on the other side, you have assholes trying desperately to take pride in being evil. I have to give the edge to the Scientologists. They have a shitload of money, a huge organization, and some seriously good-looking people. From the pictures I've seen of the anti-Scientology protests, Anonymous seems to have (at most) a couple hundred chubby kids who really should have brought enough masks for everyone.
  7. Re:Smear campaign by Scientology by eat+here_get+gas · · Score: 0, Troll

    why is it the biggest mouths here are anonymous cowards? at least i have the balls to post under my name.

    ah yes, can't let the karma take a hit 'lest all your internet friends think your a fuckwad. cuz you don't have any friends in real life do you?

    --
    the significance of a signature is insignificant
  8. Re:Smear campaign by Scientology by eat+here_get+gas · · Score: 0, Troll

    looking at your name, im thankful i had the parents i did, which orphange did you evolve from?

    --
    the significance of a signature is insignificant