Record Setting Silicon Resonator Reaches 4.51 GHz

bibekpaudel brings news that researchers from Cornell University have developed a very small silicon microresonator that vibrates at the highest frequency ever recorded for such a device: 4.51 GHz. Typical quartz-crystal oscillators, commonly used in electronics as clock signals, are about a millimeter wide and operate in the KHz - MHz range. The newly developed microresonator measures 8.5 micrometers long and 40 micrometers wide, making it ideal for use in smaller circuits and microprocessing. Quoting: "One of the advantages of silicon microresonators is that they can be integrated directly into microchips using conventional manufacturing techniques, making them cheaper to produce and easier to fabricate small. Also, multiple resonators of different frequencies could be put on the same chip, says Ville Kaajakari, an assistant professor of electrical engineering at Louisiana Tech University. In a cell phone, for example, high-frequency resonators could filter out interference from other sources of radio signals."

Comments

this will benefit lower freq apps too

[v1]

Something I'm surprised the article did not point out is its applications in lower frequency use. If you want to create a stable clock that counts seconds, you don't make an oscillator at 1hz (one beat per second), you create one that does much more, say 1000hz, and then divide that by 1000. So if you are off by a few cycles it doesn't matter much. The greater this multiplication the better. So a fairly stable 4.5ghz reference could be divided down to make an extremely accurate and stable say, 500mhz signal.

Re:this will benefit lower freq apps too

[AdamHaun]

You don't do it with a CPU. You do it in hardware with a digital counter, like this:

http://www.play-hookey.com/digital/ripple_counter.html

Dividing by two is easy -- just take the output of one of the flip-flops. Dividing by other numbers can be done by connecting the flip-flop outputs and/or their complements to an AND gate. This requires some extra circuitry and wiring, but in an integrated circuit the overhead will be insignificant. Even in a discrete circuit, if you make the reference 2^32Hz (~4.2GHz), you're only looking at maybe two counter ICs to divide down to 1Hz, although no counter IC I know of can handle a 4GHz signal.

The real issue with using this would be whether your manufacturing process can make transistors fast enough for it. The quote in the summary suggests this will be popular in an analog role for high-frequency applications like wireless. Maybe we'll see discrete timing references too.

Re:this will benefit lower freq apps too

[Original Replica]

Why is it necessary to count to 4.5 billion for a 500mhz clock? Every nine ticks of the 4.5ghz clock give one click to the 500mhz clock. Counting to nine is easy.

Neat

[tsa]

That is a fine piece of microengineering they show there! I'm impressed. I have one question, however: in the article it says: The Q factor for the Cornell device at 4.51 gigahertz is close to 10,000, which compares well with quartz resonators. Does that mean that although the frequency at which the device vibrates is higher than quarts, the accuracy is about the same?

And it's mechanical

[Animats]

Mechanical vibrations at 4.5GHz. Just think about that for a moment. A tiny piece of silicon, like a little tuning fork, wiggling back and forth 4,500,000,000 times every second. Without breaking or wearing out. It's not just electrons moving; this is a solid piece of material vibrating.

Re:And it's mechanical

[Jeff DeMaagd]

Some of the macroscopic things that we understand almost intuitively don't hold very well in the micro world. For example, DLP projection uses mirrors that twist on a sliver of aluminum hundreds of times a second, but they're reliable for many billions of actuations.