Slashdot Mirror


Comcast Offers 50 Mbps Residential Speeds

An anonymous reader notes that Comcast is offering a new 50-Mbps / 6-Mbps package for residential customers for $150, starting in Minneapolis-St. Paul and extending nationwide by mid-2010. The new service will use the DOCSIS 3.0 standard, which is nearing ratification. We've recently discussed Comcast's BitTorrent throttling and promise to quit it, and their low-quality 'HD' programming. How attractive will $150 for 50 Mbps be compared to Verizon's FiOS offerings?

15 of 332 comments (clear)

  1. WoW by Ariastis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    50 mbps, throttled, copied to the NSA, squeezed on the same cable as too many HD channels.

    Where do I send my 150$ again?

    1. Re:WoW by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      You also forgot, it's also probably not 50mbps.

      They sell the "8meg" tier here but the pipe to the headend cant handle the 8meg so if you do any speed tests OUTSIDE their reccomended you never get more than 4.4-5.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:WoW by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Interesting
      One of the most amusing quotes from the article:

      "A decade ago we couldn't even conceive of ... YouTube," Google Inc.'s video-sharing service, said Greg Butz, Comcast's vice president for marketing and product development.

      Oh my goodness! Not YouTube! Never mind services like iTunes, Amazon Unboxed, and XBox Movies which provide legal, multi-GB movie files that will happily chew through your bandwidth cap in no time flat. The real concern at hand is... YouTube.

      Executives always have a way of cracking me up. :-)
    3. Re:WoW by NormalVisual · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but I hear that they're going to be stopping those soon. Something about problems with infections of the skin around the RJ-45 connectors or something like that.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  2. Tell me, Mr. Slashdotter... by pushing-robot · · Score: 5, Funny

    What good is 50Mbps... If you are unable to P2P?

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  3. How attractive compared to FIOs? by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    You know, as much as I would love Natalie Portman, I would settle for Natasha Henstridge if she's all I could get in my neighborhood.

    In other words, if you live in an area not covered by FIOS, it's as attractive as you're going to get, buddy.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:How attractive compared to FIOs? by BoberFett · · Score: 5, Informative

      I wish I could get FIOS in Minneapolis, but I doubt it's going to happen any time soon. I cancelled Comcast for being such a crappy ISP a couple years ago and went with 1.5M/768K DSL. It's slower, but the service is far better.

      At any rate, I'm not going back to Comcast even if they offer me 150/50. They're a horrible company to deal with.

  4. caps? by Neil+Watson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And the monthly GB limits are?

    1. Re:caps? by calebt3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      42. Megabytes.

  5. Burst vs Sustained Speed by ChuBie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Forget advertising about a new 50 Mbps speed that you may only see 5 of during peak times. I want to see a company advertise their guaranteed speeds for that class of service along with the peak you might hit at 4am.

  6. Fine print by Hyppy · · Score: 5, Funny

    50Mbps*

    fine print -
    *: for only the first 10 seconds of any sustained transaction. Additional fees and restrictions apply. Bandwidth advertised will be dropped to dial-up speeds when used for any protocol not essential to the viewing of a common web page.

  7. Not very if there is a monthly throughput cap by Tsu-na-mi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How attractive will $150 for 50 Mbps be compared to Verizon's FiOS offerings?

    50Mb sounds nice, but if they cut you off after 100GB per month for "excessive traffic", what good is it?

    --
    I've built up so much character I have an alter-ego
  8. Can I run a server? by jc42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Among my questions about Internet service is whether I'm permitted to run my own servers. I have a site (with several domain names) on which I provide net space for a small collection of friends and relatives. Nothing terribly commercial, except marginally for a couple of local bands. But keeping such things on a personal machine can be a good idea. That way you don't run afoul of the ISPs' penchant for claiming ownership of any files that you put on the "hosted" web site that they so conveniently provide for you. This is especially important for the bands, who would be rather upset if they found out that their ISP had claimed their MP3s and was selling them or using them in ads.

    Right now, I have a DSL account through speakeasy, whose TOS promise that I can do all of this, and they won't take it away from me. The other ISPs hereabouts either flatly forbid home servers or "reserve the right" to change their permissions without notice. And they won't sell commercial service to a "home" customer. So FIOS et al would eliminate such family-and-friends services, as well as risking my friends' bands' control of their own recordings.

    Anyone know of general solutions to this sort of problem? Not just for me, but for all the other geeks either doing or thinking of something similar? Is there a way we can put our own stuff online, and guarantee that the ISP can't take it away from us and use it for their own commercial purposes?

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  9. 50Mbps untill... by downix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can imagine the comments now

    "Wow, 50Mbps, let me try something"
    second later
    "Hey, it just slowed down to 40Mbps"
    second later
    "what the, it slowed to 12Mbps"
    one more second
    "Hey, it's at 28.8Kbps!"

    While back at the Comcast HQ
    "Gentlemen, the beauty of the system is that it is only 50Mbps until someone actually uses. Any use of the pipeline for such bandwidth gobbling activities such as web browsing or email will be immediately countered with our new bandwidth load balancing software, reducing the available bandwidth in order to keep our profits up..."

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
  10. Youtube + Profits. by soren100 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "A decade ago we couldn't even conceive of ... YouTube," Google Inc.'s video-sharing service, said Greg Butz, Comcast's vice president for marketing and product development. Of course they were dreaming of video-on-demand a decade ago,they were talking about it at least as far back as '96.

    What they could not conceive of was the fact that would be getting free video that you didn't have to pay Comcast for.

    So what they do now is throttle your connection back out of spite. If I have any kind of sustained download, I end up at sub-dialup speeds on my supposedly 6 mps Comcast cablemodem. It works very predictably -- 7mbs for about the first 10 seconds and it starts dropping, and then a while later I am at 40 kilobits per second, I kid you not. If I stop the transfer and start it again I get the exact same "loss of service" curve.