Slashdot Mirror


Asus Crams Three GPUs onto a Single Graphics Card

Barence writes "PC Pro has up a look at Asus' concept triple-GPU graphics card. It's a tech demo, so it's not going to see release at any point in the future, but it's an interesting look at how far manufacturers can push technology, as well as just how inefficient multi-GPU graphics cards currently are. 'Asus has spaced [the GPUs] out, placing one on the top of the card and two on the underside. This creates its own problem, though: attaching heatsinks and fans to both sides of the card would prevent it from fitting into some case arrangements, and defeat access to neighbouring expansion slots. So instead, Asus has used a low-profile heat-pipe system that channels the heat to a heatsink at the back of the card, from where it's dissipated by externally-powered fluid cooling pipes.'"

5 of 115 comments (clear)

  1. 2 GPUs is the limit, for now. by default+luser · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not necessairly a limit of the board design, but a limit to what game engines can be optimized for. Most game engines do not scale well beyond two cards, as can be seen here:

    http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/zotac-9800gx2.html

    While there are a few key games that get no boost out of 2-way SLI, the vast majority of games do see improvement. 3-way, on the other hand, can actually cause WORSE performance.

    It probably has to do with limitations on how the SLI/Crossfire drivers can fake-out the game engine. There are probably limits to how many frames the game engine allows to be in-flight at once, limiting how much performance boost you can get from AFR SLI. And although you can get around game engine limitations with split-screen rendering, this mode needs specific game support, and shows less potential performance increase. Plus, split-screen rendering and has to be selected explicitly in Crossfire (AFR is the default).

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

  2. Re:Reminds me of Razors. by San-LC · · Score: 2, Informative

    But...we have a razor with six blades already.

  3. Re:Reminds me of Razors. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Say what you want. I used to always get the cheap $1 razors when I was in college because I was cheap. But the Mach 3 and furthermore the Fusion make a great improvement. Even when I shave every other day it still goes through it smooth and with no 'tearing' on my face.

  4. Re:Where are the more efficient GPUs? by default+luser · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're not asking too much, you're simply over-valuing what 3-year-old tech is capable of. The GeForce 6800 Ultra was the best Nvidia card in existence 3 years ago, and soon, you will be able to purchase the 9500 GT, which will have more performance.

    The card features %20-30 more performance than the 8600GT (plenty to top GPUs from 3 years ago), and with a 65nm process, should consume around 30w or less at-load.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

  5. Re:onionistic by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Informative

    I love that column

    http://www.theonion.com/content/node/33930

    It pretty much invented the extreme advertising meme.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;