Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Europe Rejects Plan To Criminalize File-Sharing

Posted by Soulskill on from the thanks-for-sharing dept.

Lineker points out a report that the European Parliament has rejected plans to criminalize file-sharing by private individuals. The amendment to remove the anti-piracy measures passed by a vote of 314-297. The decision is expected to influence how France, with its strict anti-piracy polices, approaches this issue when it assumes the EU presidency later this year. From InfoWorld: "France's so-called Oliviennes strategy to combat copyright abuse includes a 'three strikes and you are out' approach: Offenders lose the right to an Internet account after being caught sharing copyright-protected music over the Internet for a third time. The report is significant because it 'signifies resistance among MEPs to measures currently being implemented in France to disconnect suspected illicit filesharers,' the Open Rights Group said in a statement.

19 of 291 comments (clear)

  1. RIGHT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The right to an internet account? So, France supplies every citizen with an account until they've had three strikes?

    1. Re:RIGHT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, there aren't many of what we would call rights in France. Freedom of Speech for example. They couldn't have a Led Zeppelin day on the radio for example, since a fixed percentage of the music must be in French.

    2. Re:RIGHT? by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why so much people in US do not like us French people ? Because the wine, food, healthcare, social services, and kissing are so much better in France, Americans have to hate you so they can continue to feel good about themselves.
      --
      -I only code in BASIC.-
    3. Re:RIGHT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's a hilarious comment on an American forum, since the US likes to pretend it singlehandedly won WWII, when in reality it was mostly the Russians who destroyed the German army, and the Brits who destroyed the Luftwaffe. The US army came in late and had to rush simply to get into Germany before Stalin took all of it for himself.

    4. Re:RIGHT? by MrNaz · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're American, aren't you? I'm Australia. Yes, I ride to work on a kangaroo.

      And yes, I've been asked that seriously by an American I once met while travelling.

      --
      I hate printers.
    5. Re:RIGHT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Brits who destroyed the Luftwaffe. That would be Commonwealth not just the brits. ;)

    6. Re:RIGHT? by MrNaz · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's pretty much what I did. There is now someone running around the world who earnestly believes that kangaroos in Australia are tied up with bike locks.

      --
      I hate printers.
  2. Underground by WarJolt · · Score: 4, Informative

    Criminalizing file sharing will just drive it underground like the good old days. Whens the last time any of you sent files over IRC?

    Plus, it would be almost impossible to enforce a ban. There are already ways to increase anonymity and it's hard to block that kind of traffic.

  3. I have to ask by causality · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Regardless of what France does, When I see that the EU generally doesn't just cave in anytime a corporation wants to use their government to further its own interests, my first thought is: Did someone steal the balls of every American politician and ship them overseas or something? It would explain quite a bit...

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    1. Re:I have to ask by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's an international ball market, get used to it

    2. Re:I have to ask by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 5, Informative

      Let's not develop the false impression that everything is great in the EU. We (I live in the EU), too, have bad laws, and a patent office that has granted software patents. Here, too, there are fear of the terrorists, discrimination against muslims and foreigners (even from other EU countries), security theater, governments that block investigations of possible mishaps, unreliable voting machines, religious fanaticism, the works.

      Not that life is downright terrible in the EU, but we need to keep our eyes open, promote what is good, and correct what is wrong. Sure, I guess it's fun to laugh at Americans who can't spell their own language right, think Holland is the capital of Amsterdam, and are being spied on by their own government, but then, I know there are plenty of people in my country who can't spell their own language right, have absolutely no idea where Minnesota is, and are spied on by their government even more.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    3. Re:I have to ask by Icarium · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So Europeans are human too. Who'da thunk it?

  4. Outlawing file sharing is like... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 4, Informative

    Outlawing file sharing is like outlawing jaywalking. You can do it, but it certainly won't stop people from doing it. It may be enforced at first, but since people don't think it's shaking the very foundations of the Universe, they think nothing of doing it, everybody but a little bunch of anal jerks ends up doing it, and it's not enforced anymore.

    1. Re:Outlawing file sharing is like... by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Outlawing file sharing is like outlawing jaywalking. I agree but for different reasons. Both are a case of government ruling over people instead of representing them. People *want* to jaywalk.. they want to get from one side of the road to the other by the shortest possible route and they're willing to dodge traffic to do it. Who the hell are you to say they cant? The majority? No, we all jaywalk. So where is this authority coming from? No-where! And that's why jaywalking laws are bullshit and shouldn't even exist, let alone be enforced. Same goes for file sharing. I think we've all made it abundantly clear that we want to share files and most of us, the majority of us, don't give care about any laws we may be breaking whilst doing it.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  5. What about corporate pirates ? by bug1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So if a corporation gets caught violating copyright three times, does corporation get banned from the internet, or is it yet another case where corporations get a free ride ?

    Who was it that said that "a corporation has a body but no soul" ?

  6. The problem with not criminalizing it.... by mark-t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's say somebody who isn't a big name copyrights a particular work and starts to sell it, and let's say that a big publishing firm sees as a potential threat. What the bigger publishing firm could do is snatch the work and start distributing it (at no cost) online themselves, using their own fatter distribution pipe for the purpose, and effectively locking the smaller publisher out of benefiting from their own work.

    This sort of scenario has implications on GNU software also... if file sharing of copyrighted material without permission wasn't criminal, somebody could take some GNU software and make changes and release those changes under whatever terms they wanted via filesharing, since copyright infringement wouldn't apply to them in that case.

    I am perpetually amazed at how supposedly intelligent people cannot see that sharing copyrighted files without permission of the author not being copyright infringement is a contradiction in terms.

    --
    File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
    1. Re:The problem with not criminalizing it.... by Mr2001 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What the bigger publishing firm could do is snatch the work and start distributing it (at no cost) online themselves [...]
      if file sharing of copyrighted material without permission wasn't criminal, somebody could take some GNU software and make changes and release those changes under whatever terms they wanted via filesharing You seem to have misunderstood the difference between criminal and civil law. "Criminalizing" something means making it a crime, the sort of thing that the police can arrest you for without anyone having to sue you first.

      Copyright infringement is still a civil tort, and even though you won't be hauled off in handcuffs for trading songs, you can still be sued for it.

      The fact that the EU decided not to criminalize file sharing doesn't mean they legalized it.

      And by the way, since you brought up the GPL... those of us who are opposed to copyright in general (I don't believe infringement should be a crime or a civil tort) tend to believe that the main effect of the GPL is to give back the rights that copyright law takes away. If anyone could distribute any software without anyone else's permission, would it really matter if some of them didn't include the source code? RMS says yes, but I say no.
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    2. Re:The problem with not criminalizing it.... by Hemogoblin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are many things that aren't "criminal", but are still illegal. For example, you can be punished if you break a contract, or if you perform a tort. That's what copyright infringement should fall under: tort law. Not some stupid criminal law with mandatory sentencing and fines.

  7. Dumb idea in the first place by pclminion · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Define "Internet account." As in, your name is on the bill from some ISP somewhere? Are these people aware that you don't actually have to have an "account" to use the Internet?