Slashdot Mirror


Nanoclusters Break Superconductivity Record

KentuckyFC writes "A couple of years ago, two Russian physicists predicted that metal nanoclusters with exactly the right number of delocalized electrons (a few hundred or so) could become strong superconductors. Now an American group has found the first evidence that this prediction is correct in individual aluminium nanoclusters containing 45 or 47 atoms. And they found it at 200 K (abstract). That's a huge jump over the previous record of 138K for a high-temperature superconductor. There are a few caveats, however. The result is only partial evidence of superconductivity and the work has yet to be peer-reviewed. But its mere publication will set scientists scrambling to confirm. And 200K! That's practically room temperature in the Siberian winter."

7 of 138 comments (clear)

  1. still a little chilly by HawkinsD · · Score: 3, Informative

    Maybe not room temperature, even in Siberia: by my advanced calculations, 200 K = minus 100 F (or -73 C).

    But still very exciting.

    --
    Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by mere idiocy.
  2. Dry Ice by BlueParrot · · Score: 5, Informative

    Carbon dioxide ( or dry-ice ) is bellow 195K at standard pressure, so this material wouldn't even need liquid nitrogen for cooling. If this can be made to scale it would without doubt give countless of applications.

    1. Re:Dry Ice by imsabbel · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not everything larry niven wrote in ringworld is literal truth....

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  3. Re:What's a "strong" superconductor? by TheLink · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not sure. I'm no expert but I believe that many higher temperature superconductors lose their superconductivity if exposed to strong magnetic fields. You could say these are weak superconductors in a way.

    Whereas the "conventional" liquid helium superconductors can retain their superconductivity in very strong magnetic fields.

    Being able to "tolerate" strong magnetic fields is very useful if you actually are intending to use the superconductors in many interesting applications - like MRI scanning devices, or maglev stuff and so on.

    --
  4. Re:Grain of salt by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    The result is only partial evidence of superconductivity and the work has yet to be peer-reviewed. But its mere publication will set scientists scrambling to confirm. Why the hell did they publish before peer review? That ain't how science is supposed to work. The article "Preprint" on Wikipedia appears to disagree with your assessment.
  5. Re:Grain of salt by PhysicsPhil · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why the hell did they publish before peer review? That ain't how science is supposed to work.

    It is common practice in many scientific disciplines to publish a preprint of work before it is submitted for publication. This has the advantage of rapidly disseminating advances to the scientific community and to the world at large, since it's a public server. In the case of work in competitive fields, posting a preprint helps establish priority in who did what first.

    Because it's not peer reviewed and the preprint server is open to all, preprints must be taken with a grain of salt. Their value depends largely on the author's reputation within the scientific community. If the person who published this work is known to have produced good work in the past and/or works with those who have produced reliable work, the report within the preprint is generally taken at face value.

  6. Re:What's a "strong" superconductor? by ParanoidJanitor · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is a limit to how much current superconductors can carry before they become non-superconducting (depends on the material and the cross-section of the specific chunk of material.) A strong superconductor will be able to carry more electrons while remaining in the superconducting phase.