Slashdot Mirror


Judge In e360 Vs. Comcast Rules e360 a Spammer

Brielle Bruns writes "Yesterday, Judge James B. Zagel dismissed claims against Comcast by e360. In the decision, the judge says: 'Plaintiff e360Insight, LLC is a marketer. It refers to itself as an Internet marketing company. Some, perhaps even a majority of people in this country, would call it a spammer.' This clears the path for Comcast's counter-suit." e360 is the spammer that got a default judgement against Spamhaus, as we have discussed on numerous occasions.

4 of 156 comments (clear)

  1. CvE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Plaintiff e360Insight, LLC is a marketer. It refers to itself as an Internet marketing company. Some, perhaps even a majority of people in this country, would call it a spammer.' This clears the path for Comcast's counter-suit.

    Comcast vs. e360Insight: Whoever loses, we win.

  2. e360 aren't spammers. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone knows they are merely a 'high volume email deployer'.

  3. Linhardt is claiming that with me. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am suing e360Insight for illegal spamming. http://www.barbieslapp.com/spam/e360/e360insight.htm

    In their failed summary judgment motion (asking the court to dismiss the case based on some evidence), they claim that the spam I tracked to them is not theirs, but it must be someone trying to make them look bad because: 1. They don't spam; 2. That it could have been created in a word processor using publically available information; 3. They don't format their e-mails that way; 4. That it did not come from their IP addresses.

    e360 ignored that they have used Atriks, which hides the true IP address by running it through a sort of legal botnet. They also ignored that they use anonymous domain name registrations, so I must have been a good guesser to get most of the domain names correct (their co-Defendant, Moniker, admitted that most of the domain names I identified to e360 were registered through them to bargaindepot.net -- their sister company/codefendant).

  4. Re:What's the distinguishing characteristic? by spikedvodka · · Score: 5, Informative

    Screw that... I followed the instructions at http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/credit/prescreen.shtm

    and I get practically 0 junk mail... One place to call/visit, as opposed to haveing to call capital one... amex... etc. etc.

    --
    I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.