Slashdot Mirror


US To Employ Overhead Spying Domestically

DigitAl56K writes "The Washington Post reports that 'The Bush administration said yesterday that it plans to start using the nation's most advanced spy technology for domestic purposes soon' and that Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff has said that 'Sophisticated overhead sensor data will be used for law enforcement.' Initially, it appears that the administration plans to leverage conventional satellites for domestic surveillance purposes. Congress last October delayed launch of the DHS office that would coordinate law-enforcement requests for satellite and other technical data, and demanded answers to legal questions about the program. The administration supplied answers that some Congress members characterized as inadequate and appears determined to go ahead anyway."

6 of 392 comments (clear)

  1. More on the "advanced spy technology" by DigitAl56K · · Score: 5, Informative

    Last year CNET reported on at least one county in North Carolina already using a UAV to "monitor gatherings of motorcycle riders at the Gaston County fairgrounds from just a few hundred feet in the air -- close enough to identify faces".

    Discovery Channel's Future Weapons has provided insight into numerous UAVs, including the Fire Scout, Global Hawk, Predator 2, and the Dominator, their coverage of the Predator 2 particularly demonstrating surveillance and tracking capabilities of these units.

    According to DefenseNews the US Air Force just announced the purchase of 28 Predators as part of a contract awarded to General Atomics. The US Air Force has just begun running ads on cable TV as part of their "Above All" campaign that feature the UAVs (sorry, no online video yet).

    Initially, it appears that the administration plans to leverage conventional satellites for domestic surveillance purposes.

  2. Re:New generation of privacy concerns by woot+account · · Score: 5, Informative

    "The Fourth Amendment doesn't apply to domestic military operations."

    We're far beyond the ability to fight back against the stripping of our rights. Fight back and you're a terrorist, pedophile, and communist, of course.

  3. Re:Is that admissible in court????? by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wrote to my various congress critters, state side and federal side... so far, I have yet to ever get anything back but a cookie cutter letter. Hell even the signature was a copy.

    Pretty sad that people like you still believe that congress critters listen.

    --
    " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
  4. Re:What are they looking for? by DigitAl56K · · Score: 4, Informative

    Some of you people need to get over yourselves. You're not important enough for the government to care about. The government wants to know about everyone so that they can data mine to identify people they do care about, and you better hope through some ill twist of fate you don't end up matching their criteria - and who knows what that is? The ACLU reports that the US terror watch list now has nearly one million names on it. Do you actually believe there are nearly one million terrorists in the country? Hmmm?
  5. Re:Is that admissible in court????? by cpricejones · · Score: 4, Informative

    "National security" are the words they need to use to push the courtroom proceedings from being judge/jury situation to a military tribunal. And of course if it's "in the interest of national security" then the information cannot get out because it will "jeopardize national security."

    The parent mentions dictatorship. Here is a great article about the steps necessary to secure power in that fashion, and the author (Naomi Wolf) compares what has happened recently to other situations in the past.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/naomi-wolf/ten-steps-to-close-down-a_b_46695.html

  6. Re:What are they looking for? by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Informative

    Some of you people need to get over yourselves. You're not important enough for the government to care about.

    Really? I am on the TSA's terrorist watch list. I am not allowed to use electronic check in at the airport, and I get my bags searched every time. This is not my paranoid imagination - airport personnel have explicitly told me so... but when I've called TSA they won't take me off the list and they sure as hell won't tell me how I got on it.

    What have I done? Hell if I know. I'm a white non-religious male. I've bought a spur-of-the-moment one-way plane tickets. I own guns. I've spoken out on Slashdot a time or two. I've googled some weird shit. I will never know exactly how I got on that damned list, but the fact of the matter is I am getting special scrutiny from Bush's cronies and I have no fucking idea why.

    Maybe YOU haven't been inconvenienced by this regime yet, because you stay home and watch TV all day. Just try exercising your freedoms and see what happens.