80% of MS Server Protocols Are Unpatented
perlow writes "ZDNet blogger Jason Perlow and Centrify's Tom Kemp discover that 80 percent of all Microsoft server protocols are un-patented. What exactly then, did SAMBA license? Are Microsoft's patent and intellectual property threats simply the growls of a paper tiger?"
... afterall, to patent them, they would need to describe them :)
Tie two birds together: although they have four wings, they cannot fly. (The blind man)
To keep Ballmer from tossing chairs at Andrew!
"Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
I'd wager dollars to donuts that it isn't patented
Really? I'd be a bit more confident than that. Donuts are pretty expensive compared to the dollar nowadays...
== Jez ==
Do you miss Firefox? Try Pale Moon.
Well that is a weird analogy. Just to play devil's advocate, if someone wanted to license a sewer system, what possible use could they have for accessing the neighborhood toilets, from the direction of the sewer, no less?
Insert self-referential sig here.
Google has the patent on toilets used for a server protocol. See http://www.google.com/tisp/index.html
Some of their patents are on extremely useful ideas. For example, a few years back, they patented a method for allowing user processes to perform actions with Administrator privileges. Don't you Linux fans wish that you could license something like that?
He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
I don't know where you live, but in my world the toilets are the first 20% of the sewer system, not the last. I really wouldn't want to have it any other way.
Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
... what possible use could they have for accessing the neighborhood toilets, from the direction of the sewer, no less?
Uh, "backdoor access"?