Slashdot Mirror


80% of MS Server Protocols Are Unpatented

perlow writes "ZDNet blogger Jason Perlow and Centrify's Tom Kemp discover that 80 percent of all Microsoft server protocols are un-patented. What exactly then, did SAMBA license? Are Microsoft's patent and intellectual property threats simply the growls of a paper tiger?"

5 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. It makes sense ... by utnapistim · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... afterall, to patent them, they would need to describe them :)

    --
    Tie two birds together: although they have four wings, they cannot fly. (The blind man)
  2. Re:As a wild guess... by bazald · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well that is a weird analogy. Just to play devil's advocate, if someone wanted to license a sewer system, what possible use could they have for accessing the neighborhood toilets, from the direction of the sewer, no less?

    --
    Insert self-referential sig here.
  3. Re:As a wild guess... by SL+Baur · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google has the patent on toilets used for a server protocol. See http://www.google.com/tisp/index.html

  4. Re:As a wild guess... by gnick · · Score: 4, Funny

    Some of their patents are on extremely useful ideas. For example, a few years back, they patented a method for allowing user processes to perform actions with Administrator privileges. Don't you Linux fans wish that you could license something like that?

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  5. Re:As a wild guess... by ozbird · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... what possible use could they have for accessing the neighborhood toilets, from the direction of the sewer, no less?

    Uh, "backdoor access"?