Slashdot Mirror


Spam Is 30 Years Old

holy_calamity writes "New Scientist commemorates spam's 30th anniversary, a week from today. The first spam message — archived here — was sent to 393 users of ARPANET on May 2, 1978 by someone from computing pioneers DEC. They had to type in all the addresses by hand first."

13 of 148 comments (clear)

  1. Look who's 70 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those wondering, the original spam (nee Hormel spiced ham) turned 70 last year.

  2. Poor poor lonely RMS... by arkham6 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It looks like RMS was looking for love back then too!

    10-MAY-78 23:20:30-PDT,2250;000000000001
    Mail-from: MIT-AI rcvd at 7-MAY-78 2316-PDT
    Date: 8 MAY 1978 0213-EDT
    From: RMS at MIT-AI (Richard M. Stallman)
    Subject: MSGGROUP# 697 Some Thoughts about advertising
    To: stefferud at USC-ISI
    Redistributed-To: [ISI]<MsgGroup>Mailing.List;154:
    Redistributed-By: STEFFERUD (connected to MSGGROUP)
    Redistributed-Date: 8 MAY 1978

    ---EDIT--

    4) Would a dating service for people on the net be "frowned upon" by DCA? I hope not. But even if it is, don't let that stop you from notifying me via net mail if you start one.

    1. Re:Poor poor lonely RMS... by AndyST · · Score: 3, Informative

      It looks like RMS was looking for love back then too! well... http://www.stallman.org/extra/personal.html
  3. Re:usenet spam - greencard lawyers by Intron · · Score: 4, Informative

    The script was written in perl, of course.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canter_&_Siegel

    The article has notes about their numerous ethical lapses also.

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  4. Oh I forgot by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Speaking of spam, there are all kinds of spam. There's what some humorless dweebs call comment spam, and then of course I must try to sell you some of this stuff.

    Then of course there's Spam, SPAM, and S.P.A.M..

    CLICK HERE FOR FREE!! pr0n

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  5. Re:Nov 23, 1987 - 1st documented use by notthepainter · · Score: 2, Informative

    notice the lack of documentation to the claims. I didn't do the research on this, someone I didn't know. I had a friend point out the posting to me.

    Popular thought is that the MUDers were using the term in 1985, but alas, google hasn't archived all those MUD logs.

    Hence my careful use of the word "documented"

    Maybe I should edit the wikipedia page!

    And yes, I've been in correspondence with Brad Templeton, he also disputes my claim. But, I do have the google archive to back me up. If only I had been oblique in my reference.

  6. Re:One Thing That's Changed by Gotung · · Score: 3, Informative

    The "reply-to:" field is used by most email clients as the "Sender". You can fill out the reply-to with anything you want. No exploits needed.

  7. Re:IT WAS 1978 by fm6 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, by 1978 6-bit terminals were pretty rare, at least in the computer labs I frequented. There were no longer any significant 6-bit networks, so the only reason to have a six-bit terminal was if your terminal was a electromechanical teleprinter, because mechanisms that could print the entire 7-bit ASCII character set were more expensive than those that couldn't. And by 1978, electronic terminals were beginning to replace teleprinters. This was the period in which Bill Joy used an ADM3a to write vi — the fact that vi/vim still uses h, j, k, & l for cursor motion reflects the fact that the ADM3a had arrows on those keys (its cursor motion sequences were the corresponding Control characters)

    But it doesn't surprise me that ARPA was still using 6-bit teleprinters. I can't give a logical reason, there's just something very military about it. Major Czahor probably didn't even enter the message himself; he would have dictated it to a Signals Clerk. Quaint term, that.

  8. Re:Nov 23, 1987 - 1st documented use by notthepainter · · Score: 2, Informative

    arghhh.... lets try this again. http://groups.google.com/group/news.admin.net-abuse.email/msg/b7ce97a77276e16f I've not put it in an URL since that doesn't seem to work.

  9. Re:Nov 23, 1987 - 1st documented use by thepotoo · · Score: 2, Informative
    I agree; and I tracked down the original for you to click on.

    http://groups.google.com/group/news.admin/msg/483c12f48d13225e?output=gpl

    Slashdot should block *.tinyurl.com and that yahoo scripts place, as well as prevent AC's from posting live links.

    --
    Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
  10. Re:Stallman --- by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 4, Informative

    Heh, nice pro spam message by RMS there. Of course the context was a little bit different in 1978 than it was more than a decade later when the Green Card Lawyers really kicked off the phenomenon.

    Kind of the like a neighborhood where just about everybody knows everybody and thus everyone is accountable for any antisocial behaviour on their part.

  11. Re:One Thing That's Changed by cjb658 · · Score: 2, Informative

    telnet your-smtp-server 25
    MAIL FROM: you@yourisp.com
    RCPT TO: you@yourisp.com
    DATA
    Buy V1AGRA!
    .

  12. Re:Never used VMS by BluBrick · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, no, I haven't. But you made me curious, so I went and looked it up. VMS, like many OSs from that period, assumed that the user might not have access to lower case, and ignored case in things like the command line and file names. But that's also true of DOS/Windows command line and file systems.

    As recently as SunOS 4.2, if capslock was on during login, getty and login assumed no access to lower case. The resulting session would be case-insensitive, and presented in uppercase. ISTR though, that real uppercase was indicated by a preceding backslash.
    --
    Ahh - My eye!
    The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!