Slashdot Mirror


Speed Racer's Visual FX Uncovered

Marco Trezzini writes "View exclusive interactive samples of the digital building blocks behind the Speed Racer movie in VRMag's in-depth interviews with award-winning Matrix visual FX guru John Gaeta, Dennis Martin, Lubo Hristov, and Jake Morrison. Including Virtual Reality panoramas of the movie locations, turn tables of the mach 5 and 6, and many making of videos unveiling the secrets of the visual effects. Link to 'Speed Racer uncovered' and to John Gaeta's interview." The first time I saw the trailer for this movie, my jaw hit the floor. Nobody makes live action "Cartoons" that look like this. I guess that makes me believe there is no way the movie can be good.

21 of 274 comments (clear)

  1. Hollywood is dead to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All they do anymore is remake crappy tv shows i never wanted to watch in the first place into crappy movies i still dont want to watch.

    Writers strike be damned, im on a viewers strike!

    1. Re:Hollywood is dead to me by gardyloo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but once there's a live-action/CG movie of The Gummybears, I'm there, man, I'm there! And I want my couch-cushion fort in the theater, too.

    2. Re:Hollywood is dead to me by gardyloo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but once there's a live-action/CG movie of The Gummybears, I'm there, man, I'm there! And I want my couch-cushion fort in the theater, too. Here, let me fix that for you:

              "I'm there, man! In fact, I'm bouncing here and there and everywhere!"
    3. Re:Hollywood is dead to me by Kierthos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh thank you. I thought I might be the only one. I mean, Speed Racer? Who greenlighted that piece of shit?!

      I swear, it's like for every good movie out of Hollywood, there are five marginal movies, and for every marginal movies, there are ten that are complete crap, like this one: a movie based on a badly dubbed and chopped piece of crap cartoon about a guy who races in every single episode in this, okay, admittedly, tricked out car, and he's smart enough to remember which button is the jump skis (or whatever the fuck those things are) and which button is the buzzsaw in the front bumper, but he's too fucking stupid to check the trunk for the kid and the chimp, and no one picks up that Racer X is his brother.

      What's next? Thundercats the movie? Blues Clues the movie?

      Here's hoping it tanks like a Uwe Boll film and Hollywood gets the message.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    4. Re:Hollywood is dead to me by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why not a Blues Clues movie? Steve was in "Netherbeast Incorporated" and he's put out a f***ing awesome album with Steve Drozd of the Flaming Lips. How could any movie starring him and an animated female blue dog NOT kick ass?

      I especially want to see the scene where Steve showers with Slippery Soap, and they have to have a conversation about personal space.

      --
      I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
  2. Why the Instant Dismissal? by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The first time I saw the trailer for this movie, my jaw hit the floor. Nobody makes live action "Cartoons" that look like this. I guess that makes me believe there is no way the movie can be good. "No way?" Why on earth do you say that? I mean, the odds are high we have the equivalent of Fantastic Four, Sky Captain & the World of Tomorrow or a Matrix sequel. You know, movies that have great or novel special effects but little else. On the other hand, you could have something like Brazil, Blade Runner or 2001: A Space Odyssey. Movies that had different or strange special effects with more supporting features than just that.

    I don't think that's exactly fair. There is some way the movie could be good. The original Matrix had neat (maybe not original) effects but it also had a very sound core science fiction theme along with a lot of great drama and situations. The dialog wasn't the best but I thought the story was very very strong. My 50+ year old aunt and uncle watched it when it came out and the one thing they remember from it is the story. Not the special effects or dialog or who was in it but the possibility of this Man Vs Machine universe.

    I'll admit when I saw the Speed Racer trailer, my brain didn't comprehend anything that happened. I couldn't tell who was what, what I was looking at or even what kind of conflict the movie centered on. I was utterly stupefied. I'm not afraid of admitting that, it was just confusing and I've never seen or read any Speed Racer material so I have no precursor or knowledge of what the theme is.

    If this movie is relying 100% on its stunning visual effects, it's going to be a summer blockbuster and nothing more. It isn't going to age well and might go down as being a standard to watch on the latest plasma screen until next summer when a better movie comes out. There is, however, still a very likely possibility that one or more elements comes through to save the movie. Whether it be the directing, the acting, the story or even the music.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Why the Instant Dismissal? by explosivejared · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I am behind you all the way on Bladerunner and 2001, but The Matrix had a sound core science fiction theme along with a lot of great drama and situations...

      The science of the Matrix was pretty laughable, I mean the machines are smart enough to build human farms, but too dumb to use satellites to capture solar power. A lot of stuff didn't add up. The films only saving grace, which more than made up for the plot holes, was it's deep philosophical questions, specifically about the nature of experience and what it truly means to be human. These are common threads alongside the other two films mentioned.

      I think it is sort of obvious that Speed Racer isn't going to be tackling any sort of grandiose, fundamental question of philosophy. The whole cartoon was pretty campy, which the movie seems to have moved away from. This doesn't give make me hopeful about anything other than the visuals being worthwhile.

      Sure, it will probably be an enjoyable film, but I would be very reluctant to mention 2001 or Bladerunner in the same breath.

      --
      I got a catholic block.
    2. Re:Why the Instant Dismissal? by sesshomaru · · Score: 5, Funny
      As a fan of the original series, I can say that odds are that this movie will be deeper than Blade Runner, Brazil and 2001:A Space Odyssey combined!!!

      I mean there's a twist, and I don't want to give away anything... but there's a big secret involving Racer X. And the existential angst of Spritle and Chim-Chim. Like something out of Kafka, you see, one of the twins is actually a chimpanzee.

      If this movie doesn't sweep the academy awards, I'll have to believe that it must be because it was too deep for them.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    3. Re:Why the Instant Dismissal? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Reverse psychology.
      If they came out liking it, everyone would assert "Oh, they're a bunch of tools, the movie is teh l4m3".
      I, for one, plan on going to see this flick and reverting to age 8 for an hour and a half, irrespective of whether the movie is so content-free as to qualify as a political speech.
      Neener, neener, neener.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    4. Re:Why the Instant Dismissal? by KlomDark · · Score: 4, Informative

      They changed to the "humans as batteries" because they judged the average viewer coudn't comprehend the idea of "humans as co-processors" idea in the original story. So it got Hollywooded, and we are all slightly dumber for it having been changed to a "lowest common denominator" story. :(

  3. It's not "Speed Racer!" by zippthorne · · Score: 5, Funny

    At least, the preview wasn't. The preview was quite clearly for a movie about F-Zero.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    1. Re:It's not "Speed Racer!" by British · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. There's such thing as TOO MUCH cgi, and Speed Racer is a perfect example. It looks less like a movie, but moreso a non-interactive video game that we will see in 20 years. I'm going to skip this one.

  4. Over done. by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The previews for this film really bug me, particularly the way that the cars are constantly fishtailing back and forth. I realize that this is Speed Racer and this is not supposed to be realistic, but I believe that you need some inkling of reality to achieve any sense of excitement and drama.

    Its based on a cartoon! What they have created is a caricature of a caricature of reality. Granted that makes the previews a caricature of a caricature of caricature. Still, it gives me the overwhelming impression of trying too hard, probably to cover up for the script.

    Then again, I thought the Matrix series was kind of dumb.

  5. Go in with no expectations at all by Alzheimers · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Really, the only way to possibly enjoy this film will be to go in with absolutely no expectations at all.

    Forget the Matrix, forget the old cartoons, don't bring any assumptions or fond childhood dreams to the party.

    Just order a large popcorn, maybe get a little intoxicated, and go watch the eye-candy.

    And if there's a plot that actually makes sense, it's all gravy.

    1. Re:Go in with no expectations at all by sexybomber · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just order a large popcorn, maybe get a little intoxicated, and go watch the eye-candy.
      (emphasis mine)

      A little? Every time I see the trailer, I think to myself, I've got to go see that movie when I'm tripping balls. I just hope my eyeballs don't pop out of my head!
  6. Speed Racer = Wimp. Racer X = Truly Bad Ass by El+Torico · · Score: 4, Funny

    You never saw Racer X going "AHHHH!" and looking like he's going to crap his pants.

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
  7. For the non-US'ians... trailer response...? by Animaether · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm asking because I'm thinking that Speed Racer is primarily a U.S. childhood memory keepsake.

    I've seen the trailer pass by before various movies four times now (10,000 BC, Definitely Maybe, Reservation Road, The Spiderwick Chronicles - a pretty spread out mix of audiences), and all four times the audience's response ranged from "wtf is speed racer?" to "what's with the awful effects?".
    Somehow I can't see any of the audience here (NL) to be immediately drawn into the movie thanks to the lack of growing up with Speed Racer, and the trailer showing a minimum of story and mostly oddly-composited (I guess it's a "visual style") live action/CG doesn't exactly help to lure people in based on the visuals.

    So what has audience response been in other countries?

  8. speedracer vs ninjas? by yakumo.unr · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The CGI made me cringe.

    But what made me laugh was the trailer clearly showed he did _NOTHING_ his whole life but think about racing, or practice racing.

    So htf did he build the muscles and learn the skills to take out the ninjas they show later? lol

    He's not even a pirate ;)

  9. Why I hate blockbusters and CGI-fests by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Informative
    $100 million on the special effects

    $40 million for the leading man and leading woman

    $100,000 for the script

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Why I hate blockbusters and CGI-fests by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The sad thing is that the expensive actors tend not to be any better than cheap actors. They make a lot of money because of silly factors like looks or previously held roles, not acting quality. This is especially horrid in animated movies, where "stars" doing voices are the focus of all the trailers, and then each celebrity essentially plays himself or herself. The talented voice actors (for instance, Billy West, who plays half of the characters in Futurama) come in to audition and get rejected, while the director will then coach the auto-hired celebrity based on the improvised performances seen by the talented but unknown actors.

      Next time you see an ad for Crazy Animal Doing People Things starring Al Pacino as Every Character Al Panico Has Ever Played and Cameron Diaz as Generic Bimbo, just walk away.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    2. Re:Why I hate blockbusters and CGI-fests by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 4, Funny

      that good, and the script...I can only hope

      You can hang that up then. The only thing that will save that script is if it shows up at the theater and offers to suck my dick.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification