Slashdot Mirror


2008 Google Summer of Code Highlights

andrewmin writes "SoC 2008 has begun, and with 175 organizations and 1125 students it looks better than ever before. Here's a quick run-down of a few programs that, if they are finished, will definitely be making their way onto your machine."

16 of 101 comments (clear)

  1. E17? by Doobian+Coedifier · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cross-platform is now officially the hottest thing for desktop environments. First, KDE announced that KDE 4 was being ported to Windows and OS X. Now, the lesser known Enlightenment project is doing the same thing. Student Dzmitry Mazouka is now porting the Ewl and Etk libraries to the Win32 platform. How about finishing Enlightenment 0.17? I've been waiting for almost 8 years now...
    1. Re:E17? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 5, Funny

      Then get to it, damnit.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    2. Re:E17? by dfedfe · · Score: 5, Funny
      Patience.

      It is this very attachment and craving that keeps you from attaining it.

    3. Re:E17? by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The difference is that you are going to pay somebody to do those things. Enlightenment is done as a hobby, and it still manages to come up with some pretty cool stuff that works its way into somebody's code or maybe even a finished DE someday. However, complaining that unpaid hobbyists should abandon what they enjoy doing to in favor of pursuing your priorities is like asking the guy how lives next door who builds hotrods for fun to come and fix your toyota. If you want them to finish E17 that bad, either pay them to do it or do it yourself.

      Oh, and before I get that troll who says that this is the problem with open source, I would like to point out that the "hobby" development is not typical of open source software; most people who work on OSS get paid to do it (for example, by redhat, novell, mysql, sun, ibm, trolltech [now owned by nokia] etc.)

      --
      weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
  2. Re:GRUB GUI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Blue screen at bootup?

    Must... resist... urge... to make... Windows BSOD.... joke... aaaaaaargh!

  3. stop hating on mplayer by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since VLCs firefox plugin is incompatible with noscript, I've started using mplayer, and as its modular (unlike VLC) I can also throw almost anything at it (actually I can throw more at it as it handles realmedia too). As for interfaces well i personally think Kmplayer beats VLC hands down as a media player too.

    I also dont understand the need for a frontend to aptitude, apt + front end is just as powerful, its only dependency resolution that hasn't been well implemented in other front ends.

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  4. Re:GRUB GUI? by Knuckles · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Editing menu.lst hardly qualifies as a GUI.

    --
    "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  5. from the aptitude-gtk guy by GrAfFiT · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hi, I'm the Aptitude-gtk applicant.
    If you've used both Synaptic and Aptitude, you should have seen some differences :)
    The dependency resolution is one point, but it's not only that. The whole navigation in Aptitude is just much more efficient. Ever used Synaptic in a mixed-distribution install ? Say you want to install another version of a package and it has some different dependencies. Good luck navigating them in Synaptic. It's really not designed with that in mind.
    You can see the full application here and my development blog here .
    I warmly welcome any input on my project!

  6. Re:Pidgin projects are cool by SD-Arcadia · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the pidgin FAQ: "Why are file transfers so slow? MSN file transfer support is limited to the proxied version of file transfer support in the protocol. This means that the files are sent to MSN's servers, then the server sends the data to the other user. We don't know if or when we will ever support any of the peer-to-peer file transfer methods available in the MSN protocol." What would it take to add direct connection transfer support to Pidgin so I can actually send someone a file on MSN? Currently it maxes out around 4KB/s which is useless. I always wondered why this is not a priority.

    --
    https://dalgamotor.wordpress.com/ - Elektronik beyinlere ozgurluk asisi (Turkish)
  7. at less than 2% by morrison · · Score: 4, Informative

    Kudos to the few mentioned that will get some extra attention from this, but it's worth noting that the coverage doesn't represent even 2% of the projects that will be going on. I'd even go so far to say as many of those listed aren't even some of the most impressive or realistic, just one person's sampling of a few they know about.

    Captain obvious points out that highlighting even just one project for half of the participating orgs would be about 88 projects and would still represent less than 8%. There's also no guarantee that the student will be successful on their project. About one in five students failed last year, so nothing is guaranteed regardless.

    My point? There is a LOT of cool stuff being worked on. Check the projects out for yourself at http://code.google.com/soc/2008/
    They're all listed. Show your support, get involved, help them succeed if you really care.

    --
    Cheers!
    Sean
  8. Re:7 slots for DragonFlyBSD by Daengbo · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wrote up the SoC's projects which will probably end up in Gnome (and by extension, Ubuntu) about a month ago.
    http://www.ibeentoubuntu.com/2008/04/where-do-we-go-from-here-now-that-gnome.html

  9. Re:GRUB GUI? by Z-MaxX · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The "Legacy" version of GRUB (latest release is 0.97), currently used by most Linux distributions, has been patched by various distros to support background images in a graphical console mode. However, there is no support in GRUB 2, where all GRUB development is currently taking place. I am going to add a basic GUI to GRUB that will surpass the patches for GRUB 0.9x in portability and flexibility. Once the graphical menu support is added (my GSoC'08 project), adding mouse support will be relatively straightforward... ;-) From http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/grub-soc.html under "Fancy menu interface":

    This feature is really important for GRUB 2, because GRUB Legacy has been patched by third parties frequently, as the official version never support a graphical interface, but such an interface attracts more casual users. Support for a fancy menu - even better than an unofficial patch for GRUB Legacy - would attract more people to GRUB 2, thus this is critical in a long term to accelerate the development.
    I plan to make the code portable to non-x86 architectures (though at first VESA VBE 2.0 on PC architecture will be the only supported video driver). More details at: http://gibibit.com/grub-gsoc/proposal.html
    --
    Dr Superlove 300ml. I use my powers for awesome
  10. Re:Get GRUB2 production ready first... by Z-MaxX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Many GRUB developers are working diligently toward a production ready version of GRUB 2. I am a new contributor to the GRUB project and the reason I chose this feature to implement is because it meshes with my areas of expertise and interest. Also, I feel that making GRUB 2 usable by everyone (let's face it, right now that means it has to be supported by Ubuntu) is a very important goal. In order for Ubuntu to adopt GRUB 2, it will have to not only be functionally complete, but they will want it to look nice too, as the rest of the OS will.

    No argument that it will be great to have GRUB 2 production ready. I am looking forward to it, and I hope I can contribute to other features after I complete the graphical menu system.

    Colin

    --
    Dr Superlove 300ml. I use my powers for awesome
  11. Re:Pidgin projects are cool by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What would it take to add direct connection transfer support to Pidgin so I can actually send someone a file on MSN? Currently it maxes out around 4KB/s which is useless. I always wondered why this is not a priority.

    I imagine support for all closed, legacy formats is a pretty low priority. Why prioritize reverse engineering and optimizing less used features of an intentionally obfuscated format championed by someone trying to prevent the type of interoperability that is Pidgin's goal? Isn't it better for them to optimize file transfer over XMMP or the video and voice capabilities? I mean, if you want to transfer files with other users, there are plenty of other protocols that do work and where the Pidgin team doesn't have to work so hard only to have it intentionally broken by Microsoft at a later date. It is an inefficient use of their resources compared to working on core features using open protocols where they don't have to put in all that extra effort to overcome MS's antics.

  12. Re:definitely be making their way onto your machin by Z-MaxX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A nice UI may be more important for a Live CD install/rescue disk, for instance, where there are many choices, and you want it to simple to use and self-explanatory for any user booting the disk. Also, GRUB 2 uses dynamically loadable modules for virtually everything, so you can just not load the future 'gfxmenu' module if you like. Then it will consume no memory and will not be a possible source of problems.

    --
    Dr Superlove 300ml. I use my powers for awesome
  13. Re:GRUB GUI? by gslavik · · Score: 5, Funny

    BTW, in case you didn't pick it up, I'm the student developing the GRUB GUI for GSoC'08... :-) stop reading slashdot and get to writing code!