Slashdot Mirror


20% of U.S. Population Has Never Used Email

Ezratrumpet writes "A recent PC World article notes that 20 percent of the U.S. population has never sent an email. Does this number over- or underestimate the actual number of people who know nothing of email? What are the implications of this statistic to our society? Or are these people just Luddites who mourned the demise of the telegraph and have also never used a telephone?"

5 of 279 comments (clear)

  1. You think that's stupid? by religious+freak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    People still RENT their phones...
    http://www.clientleasingservices.com/

    750,000 of them, according to usatoday...
    http://www.usatoday.com/news/offbeat/2006-09-14-phone_x.htm

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  2. Re:So? by DigitAl56K · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why does everything come down to carbon emissions lately, and what does that have to do with the summary. But sure, I'll bite. You're using e-mail. The entire time you're writing it you're sitting at a computer using between 150W and 300W (typical). Probably half a dozen devices between your computer and the destination server are responsible for transmitting the packets over long distances (your modem, the various routers and mail servers). The NSA intercepts your e-mail, automatically runs AI on it in a massive data farm, which uses quite a lot of CPU time. Meanwhile a letter is read with zero power emissions at both ends, and it is transported with tens of thousands of other letters, the inefficient part of the transport being only near the local destination.

    But honestly, I just pulled that out of my ass, and so did you, and probably so will anyone else who replies. But that will still be more interesting than the questions raised in the summary..

  3. poverty part of the cause? by DMoylan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    from wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_the_United_States

    Poverty in the United States is cyclical in nature with roughly 12% to 15% living below the federal poverty line at any given point in time, and roughly 40% falling below the poverty line at some time within a 10 year time span.

    if you are living below the poverty line then a computer and the increasingly large amount of power it uses are a unavailable luxury.

  4. Re:Households, not population by ubuwalker31 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    According to http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats14.htm 71.4% of the entire US population uses the internet.

    Assuming that the 6.8% of the population is under 5 years old and doesn't use the internet, and assuming that the 12.4% of the population is over 65 doesn't use the internet, leaves about 9.4% of the population unaccounted for.

    Also, what about the 14 - 25 year old demographic who are using SMS rather than email?

    So, I guess what I am saying here is that if only 71.4% of the US has access to the internet, how is it possible that 18% of all households don't use email?

  5. I'll bet 20% havn't used mail of any kind ... by SpinyNorman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to this Newsweek article from 2002, in 2002 44M of the (then approx. 280M) US population were functionally illiterate.

    http://www.shashitharoor.com/articles/newsweek/illiterate.php

    From other sources about 11-12% of the US population is below the official poverty level, and I'll bet there's only partial overlap of that figure will the functionally illiterate group.

    From that perspective 80% of households using e-mail seems remarkably high, especially for such a new technology with such a high barrier (computer ownership/literacy, internet access, intellectual curiosity) to entry.