Slashdot Mirror


Getting Rid of Staff With High Access?

HikingStick writes "I've been in the tech field for over 15 years. After more than nine years with the same company, I've been asked to step in and establish an IT department for a regional manufacturing firm. I approached my company early, providing four weeks notice (including a week of pre-scheduled [and pre-approved] vacation time). I have a number of projects to complete, and had planned to document some of the obscure bits of knowledge I've gleaned over the past nine years for the benefit of my peers, so I figured that would give me plenty of time. That was on a Friday. The following Monday, word came down from above that all of my privileged access was to be removed — immediately. So, here I sit, stripped of power with weeks ahead of me. From discussions with my peers in other companies, I know that cutting off high-privilege users is common, but usually in conjunction with a severance offer (to keep their hands off the network during those final weeks, especially if there is any ill-will). Should I argue for restored access, highlight the fact that I am currently a human paperweight, request a severance package, or simply become the most prolific Slashdot poster over the next few weeks? Does your company have a policy/process for dealing with high-privilege users who give notice? What is it, and do you make exceptions?"

2 of 730 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Nothing new here by RangerElf · · Score: 0, Redundant

    BWAAAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!!

    I wish I had modpoints, damn, that's the best story
    I've read in a while :-D

    -gus

  2. Re:It's really the company's decision by really? · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "So they hired another firm to help them, that firm contracts me out as the consultant. It pisses off the upper managers."

    Damn, you spoilt my dream that I was alone in that position.

    --

    "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley