Slashdot Mirror


Super-Sensitive Spray-On Explosive Detector

esocid writes "US scientists have designed a new spray-on explosive detector sensitive enough to detect just a billionth of a gram of (nitrogen-containing) explosive. After treatment, the explosive glows blue under UV light, making the detector perfect for use in the field. The silafluorene-fluorene copolymer can detect explosives at much lower levels than existing systems because it detects particles instead of explosive vapors, and is able to show the difference between nitrate esters (trinitroglycerin) and nitroaromatic explosives (TNT). The team is currently working on a similar system to detect peroxide-based explosives and say they hope to be able to investigate perchlorates and organic nitrates, too."

39 of 154 comments (clear)

  1. This Just In... by omnichad · · Score: 4, Funny

    Explosive material found on every bedsheet of every hotel in America!

  2. Won't this creat a lot of false positives? by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Interesting

    95% percent of our paper money contains microscopic amounts of cocaine, imagine if we use such sensitive equipment to detect it. We'd all be locked up. Mmmm...maybe that's the intention.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:Won't this creat a lot of false positives? by argent · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought cocaine could only blow your mind. It's explosive too?

    2. Re:Won't this creat a lot of false positives? by EMeta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. In fact, some of the offending explosives sprayed undetectably into several check-in lines in the late-adopting airports would soon infect 20% of the entire luggage-transporting infrastructure. Sure, terrorists could never get it all off themselves, but then neither could anyone else.

    3. Re:Won't this creat a lot of false positives? by redxxx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ask Richard Pryor.

    4. Re:Won't this creat a lot of false positives? by Gat0r30y · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One would hope that they would be intelligent about it and only use the stuff on "abandoned luggage" they find about the airport to determine whether or not to call in the bomb squad.
      Of course this would require prudence and an ounce of sense from the TSA - I wouldn't count on it. In fact I bet this is used in the most inconvenient, ridiculous, and stupid manner possible. Like perhaps aerosolizing the stuff all about and making everyone walk under a black light so as to maximize the time it takes to get from a ticket counter to a plane.

      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    5. Re:Won't this creat a lot of false positives? by TheCarp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > Sure, terrorists could never get it all off themselves, but then neither could
      > anyone else.

      Are you sure?

      Actually I think the terrorist has the best chance. So they adopt clean room style techniques to separate production of explosives from packaging them. Produce the explosives, produce the other componenats. seal them in a plastic layer... hand off to a clean person at the door who takes it to a clean room, tosses it in a tub to be washed, and leaves it to the next guy who has never been to a room full of explosives with all clean clothes to sew it into a bag or other operation.

      They can even do test runs where they just test moving something innocuous that they bag up and try to fly with and see if it picks up residue. As long as it looks like a false positive, they get their information.

      I don't really think any number of technological measures will ever stop a determined attacker who can choose his methods and his time.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    6. Re:Won't this creat a lot of false positives? by mdvandam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Chage the external politics, and forget about terrorism. don't make enemys

  3. Fun airport prank by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sprinkle peroxide on everybody's luggage.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:Fun airport prank by TheCarp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      actually, I was thinking more fun would be to get you rhands on the chemicals that are used to train dogs to smell for drugs. A few tiny sprays of "Ode de Cocaine" should keep them busy for a while.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    2. Re:Fun airport prank by tambo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The day that an airline tells me they want to spritz me with some random crap as part of their screening procedure is the day that I stop flying.

      Everyone has a limit beyond which flying, no matter how convenient, is just not an option. This is (one of) mine.

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
  4. how about glycerin by utnapistim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, can it detect glycerin? I think it's found in many skin care products.

    Then again, is there any information on the number of false positives of this thing?

    --
    Tie two birds together: although they have four wings, they cannot fly. (The blind man)
    1. Re:how about glycerin by Atraxen · · Score: 5, Informative

      You've fallen into the most common problem non-chemists have when reading about chemistry. Glycerin is NOT the same thing as trinitroglycerin. The reactivities aren't even close, and the structures have significant differences which lead to very different behaviors. Another comment also treated household hydrogen peroxide as equivalent to all other peroxides, and assumed they would all be detected the same way (this shows the same misconception, but is accidentally more correct than the parent comment...)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glycerin
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinitroglycerin

      Remember folks, if you're chemically untrained the WHOLE word is what you should be looking for (there is structural info in the name, and that helps give rise to the properties we observe, but interpreting structures into behavior is tricky even for professional chemists....) Some analogous circumstances which arise from noticing a word fragment and extrapolating.....
      screw = screwdriver
      son = sonogram
      hill = hillary
      bus = business

      I'm sure there are better examples, but hopefully I've made the point.

      --
      Be careful of your thoughts; they could become words at any minute...
  5. Nitrogen by Bovius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article isn't terribly specific about which nitrogen compounds react to the spray, only providing a couple of examples. If I worked in my garden 5 days before a flight, am I going to get hazed by TSA because I didn't eliminate every last speck of fertilizer from my clothes?

    1. Re:Nitrogen by dugjohnson · · Score: 3, Funny

      The article isn't terribly specific about which nitrogen compounds react to the spray, only providing a couple of examples. If I worked in my garden 5 days before a flight, am I going to get Tazed by TSA because I didn't eliminate every last speck of fertilizer from my clothes? There, fixed your question for ya. You're welcome! There, fixed your welcome for you. No, no, it was my pleasure.
      --
      My brain is overly lubricated
    2. Re:Nitrogen by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I'd also worry if I were you, if you've played cards or pingpong, or played guitar (if the guitar itself isn't lacquered with it, the guitar pick is made of the damn thing), or if you've held hands with your SO who uses nail polish, or a few other cases. That's for nitrocellulose alone, best known as guncotton and the primary component in cordite. (Modern gunpowder, sorta.) Also the primary component in celluloid, hence the above list.

      IIRC the UK has a famous case where they threw 3 Irish guys in jail for having played cards on a long train trip. Had nitrates all over their hands.

      So, well, while the Irish and Brits seem to have mostly learned to live with each other lately, I'd start worrying if you look like an Arab and travel to/in the USA.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    3. Re:Nitrogen by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Informative
      And if you buy it in commercial quantities it starts to get useful for blowing things up! But anyway - a lot of things are explosive. A tablespoon of petrol in a large barrel is sufficient for a good bang. It's just the question of getting the mixture right.

      And I also heard about two boys playing and they got hold of an inner tube for a tractor. They filled it with gas from a gas welder and added a long fuse. They nearly cracked all windows in the village they lived - and they did get a beating by their father afterwards...

      And overheated water boilers are fine too! Just watch that episode on Mythbusters...

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  6. I lost faith in the current system by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I lost faith in the current airport explosives detectors when I found out that Bondo products set them off. It was a hilarious hour or so watching a broken system thrash about trying to figure out why their machine kept beeping when there were clearly no explosives in my bag.

    Did I mention that this was after a Defcon in the Las Vegas airport?

    I lost what little respect I had in the system (note: Not the people you would ever see on the floor, they have been pretty OK for the most part) at that point.

    Between the War On Moisture, pointless shoe removal, and a TSA that can't ever answer any question with the word 'Why' in it, I have absolutely zero faith in the system any more.

    I am a frequent flier, put in over 100K miles last year and am on track to do more than that this year. If you simply go through the airports enough, you can trivially avoid any security measure there is, it isn't even a trick.

    So, spray on bomb detectors? Great. So? Send the bad guys through security 25 times and you will see several obvious ways to not get it checked. Game over.

              -Charlie

    1. Re:I lost faith in the current system by Amouth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      you might get a kick out of this ..

      two years ago a friend of mine was going back west for xmass to see his family - they are all gun owners and enjoy shooting. He has an AR-15.. apprently ammo is much more expensive out west than here in NC.. so he did his homework and looked up the laws on carrying his AR-15 and ammo with him to go out west.

      he went out and bought the special padded ammo case - and padded gun case that met the requirements.

      when i drove him to the airport.. i went in with him just to make sure they didn't become asses about it and make him leave his gun (if they did i would takeit home).. anyways.. the gun was fine.. the ammo they looked at.. opened.. and spent 30min talking about.. then came to the conclusion.. that he could take it BUT on take the ammo that was still in the orginal manufacturs boxes.. there for the loose shells in the fome inserts couldn't be taken.

      so they took about 40 live rounds of 7.62 out of it.. put it in a clear zipplock bag and handed it to me to stand and wait in the security check line till he boarded the plane....

      so for about an hour every single person is looking at me funny.. and i have to explain to ever damn cop/marine flying home why i have this .. yet the airport security people never said a damn thing to me.

      at that point i think it would be safer to replace airport security with Honda robot's.. as they follow scripts better and would be less likly to be ass holes to people they didn't like

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  7. DOS attack by snsh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I never understood what happens when an airport baggage handler gets a second job as a landscaper, and comes to work every day covered in nitrates, and spreads it on everyone's luggages? How do chemical detectors deal with all these sources of noise?

    1. Re:DOS attack by pilgrim23 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      by Hobby I handload. That is, I create special rounds in obscure calibers and target shoot. I realize few here would share my hobby, or understand it. Being technically minded in the geek science of ballistics does NOT brand me a terrorist in my eyes, but this would do so on the waterboards of Homeland Security. This is what we have come to?

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    2. Re:DOS attack by Hojima · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think it'll be used to detect what contains an explosive or not. It's too sensitive for that, and dogs could probably do a better job. I think this would be for post examination of an explosion, or to determine the composition of a bomb that needs deactivation and assessment (RTFA). Even cleaning products could set it off, so it'll be used in an occasion where people know that there is/was an explosive.

    3. Re:DOS attack by Znorty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If the tech exists, the bureaucrats will use it. my stepfather witnessed an annual Guy Fawkes fireworks display in London, and then several days later flew 14,467km back to Australia. after taking several more modes of transport home he was arrested in one of the smallest airports in the world (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnarvon_Airport) for having nitro explosives on him (a result of an explosive scanner detecting fireworks residue on his jeans). the ridiculousness of this is obvious, but i'm sure many customs departments will be sold on the 'effectiveness' of a tool like this.

  8. My thoughts by esocid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When reading this was, so people's clothing and bags will be covered with this fluorene polymer for who knows how long. And if used liberally in an airport, we'll be breathing aerosolized fluorene. It's not classified as a carcinogen, but I don't believe humans have ever been chronically exposed to it, but I guess we'll find out if the TSA starts using it in a few years.

    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
  9. Bah, why reinvent the wheel? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

    A spray-on explosives detector already exists. Here's a picture of it in action in a field situation where explosives may have been present.

    That one has a few negative side effects, though... Maybe this new one improves on them? That'd probably be helpful in airports.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  10. Great A New DOS Attack by logicnazi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So isntead of bothering with the trouble of setting off a bomb just spray a bunch of people with a little bit of chemical. If your compatriots do so at other major airports you can probably shut down the whole system for a good while.

    --

    If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

  11. Re:will it cut down the line at the airport? by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 4, Informative

    Security Theater is just that -- a system designed to placate the public that "something is being done" by giving the perception that it's safe to fly. But a certain number of guns, knives, and God knows what else still make it through every day.

    You cannot have truly secure airport security without going Israeli-style (i.e., checkpoints a mile away from the terminal, multiple interviewers asking you about your trip and then comparing notes, open pretty much EVERY bag and asking the passengers about the contents, etc.). Yes -- I've flown internationally thru Ben Guiron Airport in Tel Aviv and checking in for the flight back to the States took about 3 hours (and this wasn't even El Al -- it was Continental). It's incompatible with the current American expectation of not being racially profiled and of getting thru security within 20 minutes.

  12. And... by actionbastard · · Score: 4, Funny

    It has a fresh pine scent!

    --
    Sig this!
  13. too bad it causes cancer by nguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/1809825/Environmental-Protection-Agency-flourene

    Well, OK, technically it's silaflourene, but that has a good chance of being worse.

    I really think you don't want this stuff sprayed on you.

  14. Re:will it cut down the line at the airport? by TheCarp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Woefully inadequet? When exactly was the last time a US plane was hijacked? When was the last one brought down? What is the signifigance of the impact of the dead from airplane crashes due to terrorist action in relation to say, traffic accidents?

    It looks to me like airoort security is FAR tighter than it ever needed to be. The simple fact is, there just isn't that much of a call for keeping bombs off planes
    . Its more a demand problem really. There are plenty of planes to blow up, not shortage at all, just a very low demand for blowing them up. So low that it doesn't happen still, even with the lax and weak security theater going on at the "checkpoints"

    Its a non-issue. Seriously, spend more time worrying about your cholesterol and keeping your driving skills sharp, those are far bigger dangers to you.

    -Steve

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  15. Four years for 3 milligrams by mbone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know how many people here know this, but a UK citizen was arrested and sentenced in Dubai for 3 milligrams of cannabis. Once people can get arrested for microgram or smaller levels of anything, no one will be safe, since no one will be able to tell if they haven't been exposed at that level, and it will be very hard to verify that the vanishingly small evidence was indeed what was claimed.

  16. Oh Good..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh good! Something even MORE SENSITIVE, and thus MORE SUBJECT TO FALSE POSITIVES!

    Now, Big Brother will have reason to pull you aside because they found:

    1) Ammonium nitrate (from fertilizer residue on your golf clubs, shoes, clothes, and anything that ame into contact with equipemnt or fertilized ground)
    2) Nitroglycerin (from hand lotions, creams, and medication)
    3) Nitrocellulose (unburned powder residue from anybody who shoots or hunts)
    4) Phosphorous (residue from matches)
    5) Hydrocarbons (from gasoline/diesel if you filled your car up before arriving at the airport)
    6) PETN (From heart medication)
    7) Glycerine (from hand lotions/creams/makeup)

      Considering all the false positives and not a single positive, this product is pretty much useless, except for collaring people who ARE NOT terrorists. Even more so, what about the people who don't know what the ingredients in their personal product are?

      How could someone, especially your average Jane Doe who most likely does not realize that her hand cream contains nitroglycerin? How about the cranky guy who doesn't realize he has ammonium Nitrate on his clothes that rubbed off on him from his dog who rolled around on someone's freshly fertilized lawn? How about the guy taking PETN or nitroglycerine for heart problems? Does he need to be a pharmacist as well as a chemist to know that it's the same stuff used in bombs? What about the guy who filled up his car on the way to the airport and has diesel or gasoline fuel residue on his hands? What if you are an avid rifleman? Does the presense of nitrocellulose on your hands/shirt/pants make you a suspected terrorist? They truly and honestly won't be able to explain these things, because they don't know that virtually every product used in daily life can potentially have some "explosive" (when used in pure quantities) ingredient that those overzealous, jackbooted customs "agents" are itching to collar you for.

    This product has a *VERY* limited market, and by limited I mean only flights originating from certain, suspect Middle Eastern Countries. Using it in the Civilized World, it serves no more purpose than to give Big Brother enough "Probable Cause" to ruin your day, if not your life.

    I'd like to see the numbers of False Positives compared to TRUE POSITIVES.

    This crap is no more use than as an expensive can of Cheez Whiz.

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  17. Salt substitute... by SmoothTom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Black powder is based on potassium nitrate (and charcoal and sulfur), but so is the salt substitute I use in my low-sodium diet.

    I suspect that I probably have enough potassium nitrate on everything I own to leave trace on everything that touches anything I own.

    Given the extreme sensitivity of this solution, my entire world would probably glow blue.

    Of course anyone who just ate fries at MacDonalds has hands just COVERED in nitrates (sodium nitrate - plain old table salt)...

    I question how useful this is in the real world.

    --Tomas

  18. Re:Won't this create a lot of false positives? by 3waygeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    And let's not forget all the heart disease patients -- lots of them take nitrates. I take one nitrate drug (Imdur) daily, and occasionally take nitroglycerine; the latter would, practically by definition, set off any sensitive explosive detector.

  19. It's a joke anyway by BlueParrot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sold in tax free: Razor blades, Matches, Vodka in glass bottles, Propane propelled deodorant, etc...

    Confiscated in security: Nail scissors, tweezers, liquid volumes exceeding 100ml

    Allowed through security (personal experience ): candles, multiple liquid containers at 100ml each, litres of liquids that are inside a sealed plastic bag with a pwetty picture on it... etc..

    This is even past the stage of security theater, it is damn obvious its primary purpose is to allow the airports to sell more stuff once you are past the security clearance.

  20. Re:will it cut down the line at the airport? by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Woefully inadequet? When exactly was the last time a US plane was hijacked? When was the last one brought down? What is the signifigance of the impact of the dead from airplane crashes due to terrorist action in relation to say, traffic accidents?

    Ya know, ever since I put this rock that repeled tigers in my yard, there have been no tiger attacks in all of VT! And my wife laughed at me when I bought it. Sure showed her..

  21. Re:will it cut down the line at the airport? by neBelcnU · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Agreed: You want to do it right, you need to model the operations of Israeli airport/airline security.

    The impressive thing was the flight INTO IL: Transferring in the EU, over an hour before boarding, 2 cars pulled up to the plane and unloaded non-uniformed armed security who inspected, then surrounded the plane, and remained in sight of each other at all times. This was long before we saw the security crew for us appear and setup their podia to perform the aforementioned interviews. The interview was very little, but eye contact was absolutely constant after the document review. Plus an old-fashioned second xray of the carry ons. It was very smooth, thorough and no doubt expensive.

    Ben Gurion, for the flight out, was as-described, minus the wait: At 5am on a Saturday, it's rather quiet.

    Interesting at TLV: the security interviews (2 plus bag searches for those without special letters) were all conducted by young women. The entire crew was 90% women, and no one looked older than mid 30's. Couldn't figure out if those observations were the results of scheduling, or a choice for strategic reasons.

    My take on all of this is there is absolutely no substitute for an attentive person simply interviewing. US Customs has known this for years, it cannot be outsourced, it takes time to train these folks, a minor amount of time for us, and seems to be working. All reasons why Security Theater has no reason to fear: inertia will keep us on the current path well past every threshold of ridiculosity we could ever possibly imagine.

  22. Re:What about mechanical bombs? by mckorr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    5 years on the bomb squad, 3 of those doing counterterrorist work, and I never once saw a "mechanical" bomb. They all used a chemical explosive. The trigger might be mechanical or electrical, but not the explosive. I'm not even sure how you would get "electricity" to explode.

    About the only mechanical explosion I can think of would be compressed gas, and you are gonna have a hard time explaining to Security why you are toting those big compressed gas tanks onto a plane.

  23. It's a fiendish trick I tell you. by Better.Safe.Than.Sor · · Score: 2, Funny

    In a month anyone NOT detectable by this absurd theater will be assumed to be a no-good-nik because they DON'T set it off.

    --
    It's all history, man. -anon