Slashdot Mirror


Smartphones For Text SSH Use — Revisited

jfischet writes "Back in 2005 a Slashdot user asked this question and the responses were helpful — but I'd like to ask again to see what has changed in three years. I'd like to know what this community thinks is the best choice of smartphone for remotely administering Linux/UNIX boxes via SSH."

24 of 374 comments (clear)

  1. Palm OS + pssh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you have a Palm OS device (i.e. a Treo), then pssh is still the way to go. Alas no, this solution hasn't changed since 2005...

  2. Re:The iPhone, of course. by brenddie · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    The best test environment is production. - Me
    chrome://browser/content/browser.xul
  3. Sony-Ericsson M600i and Nokia N800 by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Informative

    Putty on a Sony-Ericsson M600i works ok for me, but most of the time, I'd keep the M600i in my pocket and use my Nokia N800 through Bluetooth.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  4. First fanboy alert. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I read the headline, I thought "I wonder how long it's going to take for some fanboy to recommend the iPhone, despite the fact that it doesn't have a keyboard & is inferior for text entry compared to say a blackberry, or even some of the HTC monstrosities."

    And there you were - right in the first post. Thank you for reaffirming my faith in fanboi nature.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:First fanboy alert. by vic-traill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I read the headline, I thought "I wonder how long it's going to take for some fanboy to recommend the iPhone, despite the fact that it doesn't have a keyboard & is inferior for text entry compared to say a blackberry

      Different Blackberry models have different keyboards. To call the iPhone keyboard inferior for text entry as compared to a Blackberry is to ignore the different performance characteristics of different Blackberry keyboards.

      I'm on my third B/B (7250, 7280, 8830) and of the three the current keyboard - on the 8830 - is the best for me. But I know people at work for whom this isn't the case, the particular bevelling of the 8830's keyboard hindering them rather then helping.

      I have limited typing exposure to the iPhone, but a tonne of Blackberry keyboard time under my belt, some good, some significantly worse.

      Note that the B/B Pearl is an entirely different beast, and if you're comparing residential (i.e. non-commercial/business) market phones, you'd could arguably end using the Pearl as RIM's entry.

      I've yet to see a truly comprehensive test of keyboard usability across smartphones. Here's an individual who seems to do pretty well on both a B/B (a 7250?) and an iPhone http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsUPYmUzYXA&feature=related.

      --
      [17] Leary, T., White, C., Wood, P. R., Bhabha, W. D., and Wirth, N. Lambda calculus considered harmful. In Proceedings
  5. PuTTY by Russianspi · · Score: 4, Informative

    I use Pocket PuTTY. I don't know if it is the perfect answer, but it works for what I do.

  6. First Hater Alert by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I read the headline, I thought "I wonder how long it's going to take for some fanboy to recommend the iPhone, despite the fact that it doesn't have a keyboard & is inferior for text entry compared to say a blackberry, or even some of the HTC monstrosities."

    The iPhone is fine for typing text. And the fully dynamic interface allows for some interesting possibilities for shell control, along with more room for a wider view on the screen. Penny Aracde of course, put it best... "If you find such things unpleasant, then I suggest you develop a taste for forced labor because by the year twenty-twenty all that sneer is going to get you is a slot in the underclass boiling corpses."

    Don't be so dismissive until you see what terminal possibilities might arrive with the SDK.

    And there you were - right in the first post. Thank you for reaffirming my faith in fanboi nature.

    Don't your eyes scratch a lot with that wool you keep pulling over yourself?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:First Hater Alert by dotancohen · · Score: 4, Funny

      The really annoying thing is, it would probably be great for writing with a stylus, but that does not (last I checked) work on an iPhone. The last idiot who flicked me the iFinger got it cut off and now I have the perfect stylus. I had to drive a nail through the bone to keep it straight, but once the blood dried up there is almost no smell at all.
      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    2. Re:First Hater Alert by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not having used one much, let me ask how, exactly, you are supposed to deal with 'keys' that are substantially smaller than a fingertip and have no tactile feedback to boot?

      A few ways - one, the keyboard displays a larger version of the key you are currently pressing, and does not actually take input until you lift away - so if you hit the wrong key you can slightly adjust your finger to be on the right one. That's much quicker than it all sounds.

      Secondly, truly predictive input. I'm not just talking about word completion (though it does that) but by also recognizing what you are typing by the pattern of the keys you press - so the predictor knows you are off to the side a little while typing and makes suggestions based on what you would have hit if you'd hit the right keys to start with. That works really, really well to the point where most miskeys don't actually mean you have to go back and correct a word as it simply corrects it for you.

      With more specific tasks (say, for instance, a terminal) in seems to me there is further automatic aid that could be rendered while typing. If people are having trouble getting text right they aren't trusting the correction as much as they could/should be - or they need a little more practice.

      The really annoying thing is, it would probably be great for writing with a stylus, but that does not (last I checked) work on an iPhone.

      I really liked Grafitti, did not like Jot (think that was the name) as much, but I greatly prefer the iPhone keyboard for text input over Grafitti which I used heavily for several years before my Palm died.

      You also have the possibilities to support gestures in an application as well, which could be interesting for control.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  7. Nokia E70 by thesupraman · · Score: 4, Informative


    I've been running one for close to 2 years for just this purpose.

    Runs symbian putty perfectly, does 802.11 for when you can get to it, has an ok real web browser, and does real email (imap/pop/smtp).

    And on the plus side, actually fits in a pocket, and can support real typing.

    Pity nokia seem to consider it a dead-end product, and go out of their way to ignore it.

  8. pssh on Palm Treo (unfortunately) by BrianCarlstrom · · Score: 4, Informative

    pssh on the Palm Treo is the only thing that seems to work for me. Keep in mind I want to use Emacs via my smart phone, so I need Control and Meta (aka Alt) to work well. pssh uses the center key for these, with one click for Control and a second for Meta. It also has a very small font which allows me a 80 column wide view.

    I have considered switching to a HTC phone such as the AT&T Tilt with Pocket PuTTY. Unfortunately, it seemed to hard to use for two reasons. One, I couldn't easily find a way to have a really small (but usable) fond. Two, I couldn't find a way to easily enter Control and Meta. I tried this mostly at the store, so if there are solutions to this, please let me know!

    I have tried the iPhone with server side ssh script on a friends iPhone. Again the font and keyboard issues made it seem not too feasible. It seems like the font issue would be easy to fix, but the keyboard Control/Meta issue seems even harder to address on the iPhone. Again, please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm thinking of getting an iPhone 2.x in July... web surfing has become more important than my ssh access.

  9. Nokia E70 or N95 by glomph · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Being my two phones of the past 3 years.

    The E70 has a -real- keyboard, and runs Putty perfectly.
    over the GPRS/3G network, or over WiFi, your choice.

    The N95 has a regular phone pad, but I use a folding external bluetooth keyboard if I'm doing a lot of text.
    and -every- feature of the N95 rocks. Putty runs perfectly, as always.

  10. Re:Nokia E61i with putty by raju1kabir · · Score: 4, Informative

    I use the E61i with midpssh, which has worked better for me than Putty, though I have long forgotten why.

    The E61i's keyboard works great, I can type at a decent clip, and it has a proper control key. Some unix nerd characters (vertical bar, etc.) require 3 or 4 keypresses to get to but it's not that bad. Between wifi, GPRS, and 3G/UMTS I can pretty much always get online.

    For example, even in countries where there seems to be no working data service over prepaid GSM SIM cards (e.g., Syria), I've just turned on the wifi sniffer and followed it to a fancy hotel, and then loitered in their lobby to fix a weeping server. The hotel people think I'm just sending text messages.

    Downsides: It's a big phone physically, it could use more memory (get the web browser plus a few ssh windows going and you've hit the ceiling), and when the wifi isn't making a connection to a given access point it's very difficult to diagnose why. For example, I've never managed to get it to connect via my MacBook's internet connection sharing, which would be nice so I could sync up the email when I was at an internet cafe and save money on subsequent syncs over the cell network during the day.

    --
    "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  11. Second Fanboi Alert! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The iPhone is fine for typing text.

    Yes, for short messages, typing in URLs, etc, it is fine.

    What the submitter asked for is not fine general text entry, but the best choice, specifically for ssh. An iPhone (where every slash, period & ampersand is three taps away) is a poor choice for ssh text entry.

    Don't be so dismissive until you see what terminal possibilities might arrive with the SDK.

    Right, thanks - we're looking for a solution right now, not a possible solution that may come about one day.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  12. Virtual keyboard is NEVER perfect by okoskimi · · Score: 4, Informative

    No matter how much you like your shiny iPhone, the poster cited SSH as his primary use case. It means his primary use case is typing shell commands. Which means a phone with a real keyboard will work best for him. Yes, you CAN type text relatively OK with the iPhone. No, that does NOT make it the best phone to type text on. Get a clue!

    If the guy had asked for a smooth web browsing experience, recommending a (3G!) iPhone would have been understandable. But for SSH? Pure fanboy, or pure ignorance. Take your pick.

    Oh, as for what phone to use - E70 is better if you want the regular phone form factor and have good eyes. But personally I would prefer E61i (with Blackberry form factor), as it has much larger screen (although slightly smaller resolution) which means text is easier to read. And it has more RAM, which means you can run more applications simultaneously. E.g. with E70 running a Java MIDlet and the browser simultaneously is going to be iffy because both are RAM-hungry applications. E61i is newer too, so it has a more recent version of the web browser.

  13. Re:The iPhone, of course. by Firehed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No, not really. I have one of the terminal apps installed on my iPhone and have used it for quickly SSHing in to my home machine. While it works, it becomes incredibly tedious on the virtual keyboard (much more so than normal typing, since autocorrect isn't present and wouldn't pick up on weird bash command names anyways). Yes, I even tried using vi remotely. Again, possible, but not the slightest bit recommended.

    I love the benefits of the virtual keyboard for most uses. SSH is most definitely not one of them. The VNC app is much more useful given that touchscreens are much better suited to visual interfaces (and it's surprisingly useful even over EDGE with decent signal strength, enough so that I was able to start a SuperDuper! backup of my system while at a red light on my way to the Leopard launch - no need for the fanboy comments, please - I'm clearly not one of the senseless evangelist types).

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  14. Fanboi redux. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Presumably...could also be...Possibly....potentially better...possibility.... don't....what if they did add a model with a physical keyboard?...we do not know everything ...so much in the world may change...

    Do you want to use a few more weasel words in your post? Qualify things a little more?

    You'd make a great white house spokesperson.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  15. Re:Hater Redux (to tears) by passthecrackpipe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are a couple of logical fallacies with your argument.

    You are betting on some application coming out in a month, or less then a month. Your argument seems to be that once this application is developed, tested, etc. in less then a month, it will *instantly* be the best ssh application. That's rubbish.

    You state that some unknown improvement made to the iphone, at some unkown point in the future might address all the issues theOP might have with the iPhone, and the OP should therefore wait with making *any* decision until such time as the IPhone has this improvement. This logic would extend to saying "and if the next model doesn't have it, wait some more". Thats ridiculous.

    And, on the basis of this deeply flawed argument, you call the OP a "hater". That's playground logic. What are you, 12? Does your daddy know you are using his PC?

    oh, and if you are still reading, please make sure you realise I am not saying *anything* about any of apple's products (just want to make sure you dont start changing the subject and calling me an apple hater as well).

    --
    People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.
  16. Do you really need their support? by empaler · · Score: 4, Informative
    Speaking as an ex-employee of several Danish mobile telcos, I don't see why you would need their specific support for the phone.
    Simple check list:
    1. Does the phone use a standard type of wireless signal that your carrier supports (e.g. GSM900)?
    2. Can you find instructions on how to set up GPRS on Cingular?
    3. Do you want to pay the full, unsubsidized fee for the phone?
    If you can answer yes to all three of the above, you've got a winner.
    1. Re:Do you really need their support? by peragrin · · Score: 4, Informative

      because you are danish I will be nice.

      it doesn't work like that In the USA. the USA cell system sucks, only AT&T and t-mobile have any GSM coverage, and don't expect working 3G data access without paying out the arse for it. If you happen to go to an area that has better verizon than AT&T coverage your screwed.

      Basically 1) fails 50% of the time. Not to mention that GSM in the USA is on a different set of frequencies than in Europe, so unless it is a quad band GSM your still fscked.

      I love this country no one can agree on anything so nothing ever really gets done properly, and it takes 5 tires to get it right.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:Do you really need their support? by utopianfiat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The FCC's doing a lot of things wrong- in fact they're doing the same thing wrong that every other governmental organization is doing.
      "Deregulation" increases competition in undeveloped markets. When there are already big players, all deregulation does is increase the competitive power of those players to squash and purchase smaller startups. What the government needs to do is to subsidize the startup capital and regulate the big players. THAT will increase competition because it will lower the barriers to market entry.
      The biggest problem with the FCC is that as a regulating body, they are not. Instead what's being done is state and local governments move in to tax the startup capital for telcos (which should be bought and paid for by tax dollars which are going to Iraq), and the FCC pussyfoots around with their "deregulation" to make sure that men with money don't have to pay shit to anyone.

      This is how your small ISP in buttfuck, new jersey can get raided by FBI and have your server taken straight off the rack, but AT&T is rewarded for illegal wiretapping.

      --
      +5, Truth
    3. Re:Do you really need their support? by jddj · · Score: 4, Funny

      and it takes 5 tires to get it right.

      Gotta agree - Americans love that full-size spare...

    4. Re:Do you really need their support? by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 4, Informative

      and don't expect working 3G data access without paying out the arse for it


      Uh, you mean like $15 per month for unlimited EDGE/HSDPA for AT&T's MEdia Net?

      If you happen to go to an area that has better verizon than AT&T coverage your screwed.


      AT&T and Verizon's coverage quite good. Even T-Mobile works really well 95% of the time.

      Not to mention that GSM in the USA is on a different set of frequencies than in Europe, so unless it is a quad band GSM your still fscked.


      Quadband, you mean like nearly every decent GSM handset released in the last 5 years?
  17. Re:A bit early to ask, it seems to me by itsme1234 · · Score: 4, Informative

    "I guess one could buy a bluetooth keyboard to go with the iPhone"

    No, you couldn't. Don't assume iPhone would do anything that a windows mobile device does (for the last five years I might add). No, no, no. When Apple says bluetooth they mean precisely two (out of more than 20) profiles: Hands-Free Profile (HFP) and
    Headset Profile (HSP). That means NO keyboard (and "no" many other things like quality audio out - and no remote control for that matter, no serial profile=no bluetooth GPS, no file transfer over bluetooth, no [about 20 times more no]).