Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

UK Proposes Banning Computer Generated Abuse

Posted by samzenpus on from the not-even-with-unicorns dept.

peterprior writes "The UK Justice Minister is planning to outlaw computer generated images and drawings of child sex abuse. While photographs and videos of child sex abuse are already illegal, undoubtedly to protect children from being exploited by these acts, what children will be protected by this new law? If there is no actual child involved is the law merely protecting against the possibility of offenders committing future crimes against real children?"

8 of 740 comments (clear)

  1. That's it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Any further goatse, 2 girls 1 cup, or tubgirl links will result in the poster being modded -1 Troll and reported to the UK computer police.

    1. Re:That's it! by FMZ · · Score: 5, Funny

      First they came for the pedophiles, and I did not speak out - because I was not a pedophile. Then they came for the anal stretchers, and I did not speak out - because I was not Goatse. Then they came for the girls who like to share cups of feces, and I did not speak out - because I was not a girl with a friend with a cup. Then they came for me - and there was no one left to speak for me.

  2. Re:Pedophiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think we should dismantle every buildiing with naked babies with naked babies perched on top of massive, rock-hard shafts. So what if they're just statuary on the top of columns of every major cathedral in every Christian nation? That'll serve those awful pedophile priests right!

  3. Computer generate abuse? by Martian_Kyo · · Score: 5, Funny

    While (true)
    {
          me.bitchSlap(wife)
    }

    before anyone one says anything,
    I know this wont compile.
    Cause wife is null.

  4. Think of the pixels! by admiralfurburger · · Score: 5, Funny

    Won't someone think of the pixels?

  5. Re:logical progression by sakdoctor · · Score: 5, Funny

    The logical progression is of course to ban children. If we don't have any children, then they can't possibly be abused and will therefore be safe.

    Is this good logic? Can I have a job as a politician yet?

  6. Please think of the children! by naich · · Score: 5, Funny

    On second thoughts - don't. It's illegal now.

  7. Re:peterprior must be a paedo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why, this CGI is gateway porno!
    Yeah, it commonly leads to Perl, PHP and in the worst cases Ruby on Rails.