Slashdot Mirror
Google Accidently Revealed As eBay Critic
Xiroth writes "In what could cause an escalation of tensions between the two internet giants, an anonymous critique of eBay's upcoming move to accepting only PayPal as the payment method in Australia has accidently been revealed to have been submitted by Google thanks to PDF meta-tags."
I think it's funny that the PDF dissapeared shortly after the discovery, only to be reposted with the incriminating metadata stripped out hours later. That's pretty brazen since the cat was already out of the bag.
Did anyone NOT think that Google astroturfs like all the rest? They just got busted at it is all.
so does it really prove that the document came from Google? Of course, they might be the one but who knows...
They called me mad, and I called them mad, and damn them, they outvoted me. -Nathaniel Lee
eBay is wrong and unethical, Google is right to complain.
This space available.
For all of you saying this was Google's mess up... please RTFA:
The Australian competition watchdog has accidentally revealed Google as the anonymous source of a submission that is highly critical of eBay's proposal to force its users onto the PayPal payments system.
Google didn't mess up, the watchdogs did.
Well, eBay owns Paypal, so why is anyone surprised? And in any case, what's the big deal with using Paypal? Sure, I've heard the horror stories, but fortunately nothing like that has ever happened to me as a seller, so there ya go.
I'll say one thing in defense of paypal -- it sure is damned convenient.
My blog
They have a payment system and the technical capabilities, time for Google Auctions. Fuck ebay.
Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
Seriously, would a spellchecker kill the editors?
I did get screwed by PayPal as a buyer once - bought two of an item and only received one, but I was told that as long as I received *something*, even an empty package, that PayPal wouldn't help me out. Maybe that's changed.
I've made thousands of sales through PayPal without any problems, but there are a couple of reasons for that. First, I'm not selling on eBay - all of the sales are through my own site, which doesn't attract scammers (Indonesian credit card fraudsters aside) like eBay does. Second, I've got a low enough return rate and high enough margins that I can afford a liberal return/replacement policy. Sending a prepaid return mailer and issuing a full refund to the rare dissatisfied customer does a very good job of defusing conflicts.
Yes, PayPal's fees are a little high. Not vastly higher than the discount rate on a card-not-present merchant account, though. Dropping PayPal as a payment option would mean losing many of my sales to certain countries.
But parent is right - they want to be a bank but without the regulation. For the fee they take, they provide very little protection, compared to the credit card companies. I would imagine that ramping up a large enough fraud department to properly handle the number of disputes they get would be VERY costly, and short of the government forcing them into it, I can't see it ever happening. As long as that great sales engine of eBay keeps cranking along with a 99% success rate, people will just accept it.
Certain types of clothing is an obvious case where a no refund policy (think used underwear... ick) is highly appropriate. Likewise second hand, already opened software or music is another. There are also situations like selling items on consignment where it is impractical to offer a return policy due to insufficient margins. But even beyond all that, if a vendor wants to sell something with a no return policy that is their right just as it is your right not to buy from them. Nobody expects you to be walmart (though many Americans think that?) and take broken crap back, but if the item hasn't even been opened, you should be taking it back and deducting the shipping fee. Actually buyers DO expect you to be Wal*Mart and that's the problem. If the seller actually got the shipping fee back on returns that would be fine but with PayPal they do not. PayPal does NOT refund shipping EVER. As a seller I am NOT willing to eat a $10 to $100 shipping fee (depending on the item being shipped) just so someone can on a whim decide they don't like something. That's a fast way to lose a ton of money. Furthermore I've experience countless cases where someone shipped back merchandise they broke (not the carrier) and PayPal gave them their money back without the slightest effort to verify the condition of the merchandise. Wal*Mart makes billions and can afford to accept returns for any reason. That rarely describes sellers on eBay. "Bad buying experience" is caused entirely by sellers who want an easy way to ditch customer service in favor of keeping more of the profit Try actually running a real business someday before making such a ridiculous statement. "More profit"? Try ANY profit. It is extremely difficult to make ANY profit selling on eBay. A no questions asked return policy on top of 7-10% eBay/PayPal fees and non-reimbursed shipping costs is a good way to go out of business fast. Furthermore there are at LEAST as many scummy buyers as there are scummy sellers on eBay. I've seen every scam in the book first hand as a seller and you're going to tell me it's all the sellers fault? You have no idea what you are talking about.
Indeed, the infrastructure is already there.
But, we really just need a web-host with a number of decent templates for various items, and a strict classifying scheme to promote good searching. The "auction" bit is a nice gimmick, but search capabilities are more useful.
For instance, you shouldn't have to do a text search for laptops and manually filter out all the laptop accessories. You should be able to drill down your requirements until what remains is a number of laptops that meet your requirements with varying prices and optional stuff that might help your decision, but isn't strictly necessary.
eBay doesn't even do this very well and that's their core business. The auction bit is a nice gimmick, and has some utility in establishing market price for items you're not sure about, but an improved version of craigslist (even one where you pay for the listings) would be an eBay killer.
Can you be Even More Awesome?!
The problem with Google's posting of an opinion, that many probably agree with, is that the use of ad-hominem is so prevalent and accepted that, these days, it is impossible to state something factual and verifiable, or reasonable and well thought out, without it being automatically colored by what people's perceptions of your motives might be.
People have just given up even attempting to think. They judge quickly based on sound bites and prejudices, they no longer contemplate the validity of an argument before forming an opinion.
Because of the network effect.
/. ^.^
Amazon tried, as well as Yahoo (years ago), to compete with ebay's business but you know what, although everyone griped, save the true Mom and Pop believers, and gripes to this day about Ebay's atrocious failings it is the commom people, you know the everyday peons, which think of Internet auction and Ebay as synonymous. AS though they are one and the same.
If I recollect Yahoo even made their offerings gratis, free. And they still did not make a dent.
Before you say, ja, mon, but Google is different, let me point out that Google Video could not compete with the Youtube (and they tried and tried), and as a consequence Google threw money at the Youtube founders. That network effect again, or the bandwagon effect, as wikipedia alternatively calls it.
Let's hope you are right, that Google competes for Ebay's profitable "auction" business. And consequently brings some responsiveness to that field. I have see my gf during the Teenie Baby craze use Ebay regularly, I never have, thankfully, but just my attemtps over the yearS(!) to peruse their wares left me, still leaves me flabbergasted at how shitty they are!
Anyhow, real competition to Ebay apparatenly comes from Craigslist, so the newspapers say and fear, and strategize to subvert. Try they do. Maybe Craigslist will be the antidote. Or auction.google.com. Nah! Never! The states regulate the auction business, that is why Ebay never refers about itself with the term auction. Auctioneers have to meet a lot of governmental regulation. Only lazy newspaper writers, and/or recently assigned to the beat, use that term so readily near Ebay, Inc.
Man, all this has been discussed over the years on the
I never said I should get to determine it - just that people who run businesses on eBay are total assholes of the type who fancy "get rich quick" schemes. Thus, the market for honest person-to-person sales has been demolished by the hungry "power sellers". Heh, I don't think my arrogance (of which there's plenty) can compare to the craziness of people who go to eBay brainwashing meetings for sellers, who buy into the cult completely. It's like fucking Scientology crossed with Amway.
... and then they built the supercollider.