Slashdot Mirror


Building a Miniature Magnetic Earth

Doofus writes "There was an interesting story on NPR this morning about a geophysicist who has constructed a miniature earth to model the earth's dynamo effects. Dan Lathrop, a geophysicist at the University of Maryland, has constructed a 10-foot diameter stainless steel sphere. He intends to fill the sphere with molten sodium and spin the sphere to examine the propensity for the system to generate its own magnetic field. The article includes both video, in which Lathrop spins up the sphere, and audio, including the conversion of magnetic wave functions in prior experiments into audible sound: literally the music of the spheres."

150 comments

  1. This isn't new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have seen this before in a Discovery Channel show.

    1. Re:This isn't new by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 4, Funny

      WTF? Mythbusters created their own planet? Where the fuck do I sign up? I've been worshiping Kari for a long time now, but I didn't know her deity status had been made official!

    2. Re:This isn't new by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 4, Funny

      > An interesting story on NPR this morning, about
      > a geophysicist who has constructed a miniature earth

      "Everything was modeled with exacting proportionality, including Pamela Andersons fake breasts, approximately 1cm in diameter on the beach-ball sized planet."

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:This isn't new by Megane · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you didn't realize you were actually watching PBS? Remember them, plain old antenna, no cable box, no monthly bill? (except for the pledge drives)

      NOVA: Magnetic Storm

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    4. Re:This isn't new by adona1 · · Score: 1

      And hey, a bunch of wizards already did something similar...

      --
      Between the falling angel and the rising ape
  2. stainless steel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Miniature earth? Stainless steel? I know it's been a while since I took my geology courses, but the Earth isn't made of stainless steel IIRC. And the phrase "harmony of the spheres" has a much more poetic ring to it.

    1. Re:stainless steel? by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      Watch the video. It says to make a planet you need "1 Scientist". That's all.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    2. Re:stainless steel? by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      I don't mind the stainless steel. I do love that they call a 10 foot diameter, 26 ton sphere "miniature" :)

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    3. Re:stainless steel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and tsunamis are merely "big" waves ...

  3. Hollow earth! by Ecuador · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait, don't fill it up with anything. The model is accurate right now!

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:Hollow earth! by bsDaemon · · Score: 4, Funny

      INFIDEL!! The Earth can't be both flat AND hollow! I'll kill you!!! I'll kill you all!!!

    2. Re:Hollow earth! by ninevoltz · · Score: 1

      It's hollow AND full of oil! At $4.00 a gallon, that figures out to $1,148,400,000,000,000,000,000,000. I drink your milkshake!

      --
      Death is life's great reward. R. Hoek
    3. Re:Hollow earth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Karl, settle down. You can go hunting with McClellan.

  4. Dream come true! by xpuppykickerx · · Score: 2, Funny

    We're going to go create our own dome, a dome within a dome. So don't come knockin on our door!

  5. Im lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hasn't he been doing this for awhile now? I am fairly certain I have already watched the documentaries of this machine in action.

  6. thats a lot of sodium... by X0563511 · · Score: 5, Funny

    A 10-foot sphere filled with sodium? Damn... talk about playing with fire.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    1. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by AltGrendel · · Score: 1

      They actually did have a small file when some leaked out. The fire department was called, but they couldn't do anything.

      --
      The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

      - Douglas Adams

    2. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1, Informative

      No kidding. A 10-foot diameter sphere has a volume of 14,826,654 cc. I couldn't find a figure for density of molten sodium, but even if it is (as is likely) less dense than the solid form's 0.97 grams per cc, that's still upwards of 10,000 metric tonnes of molten sodium.

      Where is this? I'm staying the hell out of that city...

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
    3. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by SpinyNorman · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can't use water or CO2 (reacts with sodium) on a sodium fire, but if you're messing with large quanties of liquid sodium you'd think they'd have done their homework and know what to use (as well as to inform the fire dept that it's a sodium fire they're being called for).

      http://www.ilpi.com/safety/extinguishers.html#Picking

    4. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Check your math.

    5. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      No problem, his next research program can be into liquid metal fast breeder reactors.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    6. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by hkfczrqj · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dan Lathrop works at the University of Maryland... probably you already have other reasons to stay out of thar region of the US.

    7. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by hkfczrqj · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just FYI, one of the technicians working in this experiment used to work in a nuclear submarine, I presume taking care of the cooling of a reactor. I don't know what kind of reactors they use in the Navy, but Dr. Lathrop told me that this guy knows how to handle liquid sodium. (Disclaimer: I'm in a collaboration with Lathrop's lab, though in another experiment.)

    8. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by mapsjanhere · · Score: 5, Informative

      googling "density liquid sodium" would have given you 927 kg/m^3 as the correct number
      doing your unit conversions correctly would have given you 13.77 tons
      and I get scared with a kilo in my reactions - I'm a wimp

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    9. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by Otter · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Just FYI, one of the technicians working in this experiment used to work in a nuclear submarine, I presume taking care of the cooling of a reactor. I don't know what kind of reactors they use in the Navy, but Dr. Lathrop told me that this guy knows how to handle liquid sodium.

      The only US sub with such a reactor was the Seawolf in the 1950s. If the tech is Russian -- Alfa's have lead-cooled reactors, not sodium-cooled, IIRC.

    10. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by Talderas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Later on though, they say you should have a non-magnetic fire extinguisher if you're going to be using it in an area with magnetics.

      I can only surmise that they need non-magnetic Class D fire extinguishing equipment. You don't know if their experiment will generate a magnetic field or not.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    11. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      10,000 metric tonnes? What?

      If it were filled with water, it would about 6,500 lbs. I think your math is a *little* off.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    12. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

      Hm. Somehow, I couldn't turn up that number.

      Yeah, my conversion from grams to tonnes was off, too...but even so, 13.77 tonnes of liquid sodium is something I want to be nowhere close to.

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
    13. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by evanbd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For many types of fires, including reactive metal fires, best procedure is to just let it burn if possible. In this case, I imagine you'd build the setup so that that *was* possible, and then focus your efforts on making sure you could get everyone out of the way efficiently. A huge pool of burning sodium is certainly dramatic, but if there's no person or property in danger then there's no necessarily anything wrong with it. The caustic lye dust should fall out of the air rapidly; don't stand down wind.

      When it comes to exotic fires, there are techniques to fight them -- but by far the preferred one is to not fight it at all. Besides, suppose you did put it out -- you now have a damaged sphere of molten sodium that already caught fire once. Are you planning to approach it? I'd rather stand back and wait for it to go out if at all possible.

      I'm sure they've informed the fire department, and I'm sure the fire department intends to get involved only if there's an immediate danger to life, or a risk of the fire spreading -- in which case they'll likely try to contain it without putting it out.

    14. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      Come on, you know you want to live dangerously! 13 tons of sodium is just freaking cool.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    15. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by Firehed · · Score: 5, Funny

      if you're messing with large quanties of liquid sodium you'd think they'd have done their homework and know what to use

      A new pair of running shoes?
      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    16. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they closed the building and waited overnight for the fire to go out. This is something. I was around during the fire.

      And I still remember at the time I took the safety training, the safety guy told me, "I know something will happen someday, several hundred pound of liquid sodium rotating 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, Jesus."

    17. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by wwwgregcom · · Score: 1

      While I'm sure they have informed the fire department, as a resident of College Park, I can assure you that the fire department is your typical two engine operation. I seriously doubt they have the capacity to handle a ten foot sphere of sodium.

      --
      What signature defines me as a person?
    18. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by rossdee · · Score: 1

      A tanker of liquid nitrogen would do a pretty good job. I don't think Sodium reacts with it and it would cool it down pretty quickly. Of course liquid Helium would do an even better job but would be very hard to obtain.

    19. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "A new pair of running shoes?"

      More likely a spare pair of underwear.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    20. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by maxume · · Score: 1

      For the lazy:

      http://futureboy.homeip.net/frinkdocs/#JavaWebStart

      (it's pretty cool even if you aren't lazy...)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    21. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by treeves · · Score: 4, Informative

      US Navy uses all Pressurized (light) Water Reactors.
      I was on a boat with an S5W reactor (S for submarine, W for Westinghouse). I did my prototype training (the hands on training that nucs do before going out to the fleet) in upstate NY at the D1G reactor (G for General Electric, D for destroyer). Also at that facility were a couple of interesting reactor designs, one of which used liquid sodium as coolant (it was no longer in operation by the time I got there in 1987) and another, called MARF, that used gadolinium-lined, well I don't know what to call them, but they were like toilets, and they were neutron moderators, so when you wanted to SCRAM the reactor you dumped the water out of them, like flushing a toilet, and reactivity immediately dropped to subcritical.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    22. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Working for a small fire department, I can just about guarentee that consulting and preplanning with the fire department would be about the last thing anyone in this project did.

      Many many people have a disaster plan that reads 'if something goes wrong, call fire department' without ever considering whether the fire department is equipped to deal with their particular problem.

      I have two agricultural chemical companies in my area that deal with chemicals that they measure in tons. I went to visit them to try and preplan a worse case hazmat response to their locations. One of the managers looked me in the eye and told me that they don't have any hazardous materials at their location.

      People really don't understand what they ask the fire department to do sometimes.

    23. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by Teufelsmuhle · · Score: 1

      Liquid helium shouldn't be that terribly difficult to obtain at any major university. It's used as coolant for NMR/MRI, which is almost assuredly in place on the U. of Maryland campus. I can't speak for how well it would work as a fire retardant.

    24. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, if there are any fire issues/worries they have a large pool of water they can roll the sphere into.

    25. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by Tteddo · · Score: 1

      I went to prototype there too, on the S8G reactor. What I thought was neat is you can see the containment building (the big ball) for D1G in Google Earth. 43 2'25.76"N 7357'15.52"W. I had forgotten that the road there was "Atomic Project Road".
      When I was there in 1984 the rumors around town (Saratoga) was that it was a submarine refueling station. I guess they thought there was a tunnel all the way to the ocean! According to Wikipedia they are still running S8G and MARF but not the others.

    26. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm aren't those hinting on some classified military procedures?

    27. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by MLS100 · · Score: 1

      Just throw some Chlorine on it to turn it into nice harmless salt, right?

    28. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by evanbd · · Score: 1

      For equal mass, He is better than N2 -- much higher heat capacity. But the stuff is so fluffy (0.125 g/cc) and so expensive compared to LN2 that there's no good reason to use it. If LN2 works, but not well enough, the solution is to add more LN2 -- even if helium is somewhat better, more LN2 is cheaper and easier. (I don't actually know that LN2 works; my assumption would be that it does, but that you'd still rather have the fire hazard burn itself out if that's a viable option. Reignition is a very real danger.)

    29. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by treeves · · Score: 1

      No. But if I told you that they control pH to prevent corrosion...never mind.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    30. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      as a resident of College Park ... I seriously doubt they have the capacity to handle a ten foot sphere of sodium

      It's like this.

      You could inhale a load of ash and need serious and expensive medical attention. Then again ,you could get pro-active and install a water tank somewhere uphill from the sphere, with say a 10 Kl capacity. If there is a problem, you release the water.

      Sure, it'll cause a larger, more violent reaction, bathing you in sodium hydroxide and turning you into soap, but at least you will then be of some use to someone rather than a financial burden. And what better way to clean the local environment?

      Sheesh, you're not even trying to look for the positive.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    31. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by nerdguy569 · · Score: 1

      Being a physics student at UMD, when I took a lab tour a few months ago, one of the most conspicuous aspects of the energy research building, is the pipes running overhead containing, I think halon gas, though I could be mistaken as to exactly what the gas is. I had Prof. Lathrop for E&M this past fall, and he constantly joked about the fact that he has the fire suppression system, including his grad students, set up to call him immediately if there is a fire in any of his, I think, 4 labs. Either way, the building is pretty safe, it's pretty much entirely constructed of concrete, though the wiring, and water pipes which run overhead can be sources of concern in some situations. I can confirm though that the fire department, is well informed.

      --
      In the future, we will all be very smart or very stupid.
    32. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by n3umh · · Score: 1

      Take a tour of DuPont's plant in Niagara Falls NY sometime if they'll let you.

      Giant vats of molten salt bubbling chlorine off the top into big fume hoods (they pipe it next door, I think Olin bottles it?) Whole place caked in salt and sodium oxide.

    33. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by n3umh · · Score: 1

      We try not to react it with anything at all !

    34. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by nerdguy569 · · Score: 1

      Since there is not a hazard with sodium being exposed to dry air, it is my suspicion that LN2 is safe to pour on the sodium. To be honest though, I'd be more concerned about the oil this lab uses to keep the Na molten, since this is oil which is already at ~80C, and if water gets into the sphere, there would be flames and oil, not a good combination, I suppose that the important thing to remember is that very little oxygen exists inside these spheres, so once the water is used up, there will be very few flames on the surface.

      --
      In the future, we will all be very smart or very stupid.
    35. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by evanbd · · Score: 1

      Note that halon gas is also on the list of things not to be used in a metal fire -- it acts as an oxidizer. It sounds like they know what they're doing, though.

    36. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by VanessaE · · Score: 1
      For the benefit of the GP above who got the last equation wrong, and anyone else who cares to read:


      The volume of a sphere: Volume = (4/3) * (pi * r^3)

      Since the sphere is 10 feet in diameter, the radius is 5 feet (let's assume that's the inside radius).

      5 cubed is 125, so: Volume = (4 / 3) * (3.14159265 * 125)

      Which works out to about 523.598775 cubic feet. Google's calculator says that's about 14.8266662 cubic meters.

      Wikipedia says that, in liquid form, sodium has a density of about 0.927 kg per cubic meter, so this volume only weighs 13.7443196 kg (30.3010379 pounds), plus the container. I'm guessing the GP thought it was 0.927 g/cc.

      For the sake of units/weight comparison, pure water at 20 C weighs about 998.0 kg per cubic meter.

    37. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by Pope · · Score: 1

      If it's anything like a crystal skull, it'll only be selectively magnetic, like when you look directly at it.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    38. Re:thats a lot of sodium... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, even more sophisticated fire departments can be found lacking when it comes to certain unusual or non-typical fires. I remember getting called to a Hazmat scene when I work at an environmental services company. There was two different township stations (the typical two engine stations) and a city station with sent three of their 6 engines. It was near a large city area just outside of town too. I won't name the city because of does us no good but it has an international airport and profesional sports teams if that gives you an idea of the size.

      Anyways, A tanker truck hauling Gasoline which was fully placarded was in an accident and caught fire. It was still upright by the time the fire department started spraying watter on it. The entire top of the tanker (aluminum) was melted open and they continues dousing it with straight water causing the gas to overflow and run off into a near by stream. When we arrived (about 45 minutes after they started fighting it) and started dropping socks down stream, we could see the firefighters on the ladder trucks hosing into the tanker from the top and watch the flame jump 15 to 30 feet at times. How the gas overflowing out from it failed to catch fire, I'll never know. Finally, our foreman went over and gave them an inducer (Foam adductor) fitting with a 55 gallons of "cold fire" that we kept on the main response truck. They got it out in about 15 minutes later.

      I don't know why they didn't fight it like a gas fire and just let it burn or start with foam. They put the petroclean down just as we were arriving so they had to have some idea. It wasn't like anything was salvageable with the truck (the cab and trailer was toast and no other cars where on fire). All they really succeeded in doing was creating an environmental situation that took around 6 months to a year of remediation. After talking to some of the fire fighters, they told us (not me but some of our guys) they had the same stuff but never used it before (I guess budget cutbacks meant lack of training?).

  7. From the article: by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

    Lathrop figures it can't be too hard to get a magnetic field â" after all, most planets in our solar system have one.

    But while nature has an easy time making magnetic So, yeah -- he's been trying (but failing) for a while.
  8. He made one? by Centurix · · Score: 1

    Couldn't he have gone to the local fairground and used one of those cyclotron things where you get stuck to the side of a giant drum? Take the people out, fill it with sodium. Or one of those candy sugar spinny things that makes clouds on a stick? They're awesome. Science is awesome and has lots of sugar. Wait, salt is sodium chloride, he could make candy floss out of salt? What has science done!

    --
    Task Mangler
    1. Re:He made one? by maxume · · Score: 2, Funny

      When you heard them say "coffee", you missed them saying "less".

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  9. Been Done by Stranger4U · · Score: 4, Informative

    A group at New Mexico Tech was working on a similar experiment using a cylindrical chamber filled with liquid sodium and a way to introduce turbulence to create magnetic fields. This was started over ten years ago. Their group page is a bit out of date, though.

    1. Re:Been Done by timster · · Score: 1

      Isn't this experiment an expansion and continuation of that sort of research? Not really so much something that's "Been Done"? Are you saying that the previous work has already answered all these questions?

      The story mentions that this guy has worked with smaller simulations before, so it's not as if we're being told that this is some brilliant new idea. It's just sort of cool that somebody built such a large sphere for this purpose.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
  10. On top of things... by Otter · · Score: 4, Funny
    Sodium becomes liquid at stovetop temperatures and conducts electricity well, but it's flammable. A sodium fire can't just be put out with water. Water can actually make things worse -- Lathrop's team has disabled the sprinkler system.

    My first thought upon reading the summary here was "Man, I really hope they disabled the sprinkler system...

    1. Re:On top of things... by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Class D fires are not fun.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:On top of things... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      My first thought upon reading the summary here was "Man, I really hope they disabled the sprinkler system...

      Yeah, no kidding. That little caveat there about water making things worse is kinda an understatement too. More like "Water can actually make things kaboom". Or, at least if you're watching from a safe distance, it would also be accurate to say "Water can actually make things awesome."

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:On top of things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, and good luck getting the fire department in there to rescue someone if there is a fire.

      It's not gunna happen.

    4. Re:On top of things... by Bruiser80 · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't they just have the local airport's foam trucks on call?

      --
      Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in the mud. After a while, you realize the engineer enjoys it.
    5. Re:On top of things... by pragma_x · · Score: 1

      Water can actually make things awesome.
      Being someone who lives just over the county line from College Park (I can hear the Terps play half the time and see the light pollution from the stadium), I couldn't agree more.
    6. Re:On top of things... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I think those are used for fuel fires? I don't think that foam would help a sodium fire.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    7. Re:On top of things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of course, don't forget the stock footage.

  11. is sphere music by Aggrav8d · · Score: 1

    ...the start of a howie mandel joke?

  12. Earth as a model? by lymond01 · · Score: 0

    Well, sass that hoopy. Bypass construction notwithstanding, should be an interesting project. Frood really seems to know where his towel is at.

    (Too easy)

    1. Re:Earth as a model? by marquis111 · · Score: 1

      His shirt is a nice superintelligent shade of blue, too.

    2. Re:Earth as a model? by BotnetZombie · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm mostly worried about the fjords now. Much harder on a tiny sphere.

  13. hold on, fxiing that by bsDaemon · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I meant to quote all of:

    Lathrop figures it can't be too hard to get a magnetic field â" after all, most planets in our solar system have one.

    But while nature has an easy time making magnetic fields, scientists do not. This is Lathrop's third attempt. there we go. but the point still remains, yes - he's tried and failed before. Hopefully this time he'll manage it.
    1. Re:hold on, fxiing that by n2art2 · · Score: 1

      I think there is one thing he is not taking into consideration on. . . he is trapped withing the magnetic field of another planet. To really judge is this is plausible then he needs to send this ball of metal into space and get it to spin in space.

      Then again. . . the earth is inside of the suns magnetic field, yet the earth has magnetic field of it's own. . . so actually the difference is that he is within the earth's atmostphere, and not in space. so yeah. . . shoot this thing into space and spin it.

      --
      Self proclaimed wannabe geek. You know how it is. Most of us who read this stuff probably fit in that category.
    2. Re:hold on, fxiing that by somersault · · Score: 1

      Lots of things within our atmosphere generate magnetic fields.. natural magnets, electromagnets.. and other magnet-ey things.. no need to go into space to measure their effect.

      --
      which is totally what she said
  14. any chance by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 4, Interesting

    we can throw it in a lake when he's finished? That's a *lot* of sodium.

    1. Re:any chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you want it to still BE a lake?

  15. Just ask a Koreshan by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Funny

    You fools, you are all wrong. The truth is that we live IN the hollow earth!

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  16. Lost? by pragma_x · · Score: 1

    I saw the documentary too - they've been been mucking about with magnetic fields for a very long time; although their approach seems to be very accident prone. This should clarify things a bit:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfoXOydWFMM

    Namaste, and good luck.

  17. Re:nooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    shouldn't you be commenting on youtube videos or something?

  18. Re:Jiymm Waklre says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't drink and post.

  19. What could possibly go wrong? by mangu · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here are some interesting (true) stories on what happens when sodium hits water. But those are about small blocks, one kilo or so, and solid at ambient temperature.


    This guy now seems to bring this "sodium party" thing to a new, unprecedented level...

  20. No!!!!! by SPSTech · · Score: 0

    What the heck is wrong with them, didn't they ever see "The Core"?????

    ARGH!!! They're going to screw up the magnetic fields and we're all going to d... er... never mind.

    --
    Sig?
  21. check your math - it's only 14.4 tonnes by 1800maxim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    M=D x V
    M=0.97g/cc * 14,826,654cc = 14,381,854.38g = 14,381.85438kg ~ 14.4 tonnes

  22. Re:nooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like you're dating the wrong guys. Maybe you need to raise your standards.

  23. Swiss by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

    Swiss Cheese is both flat and hollow.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Swiss by bsDaemon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Its only flat when you cut it, at which point the holes cease to be hollows and are merely holes.

      at any rate, the inquisition has marked you... don't say later that you didn't expect it!

    2. Re:Swiss by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 2, Funny

      IMO, this "hole" discussion is flat and hollow. :b

      --
      Invenio via vel creo
    3. Re:Swiss by somersault · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that when you cut the cheese it blossoms forth rapidly into 3 dimensional space. Of course, this form of cheese is known as flatus, which is similar to flat, so I can see where the confusion is arising here.

      --
      which is totally what she said
  24. it has to be said by Raleel · · Score: 1

    He's got Balls of Steel!

    --
    -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    1. Re:it has to be said by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Steel, yes, but only one really big one. :(

      --
      Invenio via vel creo
    2. Re:it has to be said by Nirvelli · · Score: 1

      So he's Tom Green?

  25. Class D fires by camperdave · · Score: 5, Funny

    Class D fires are not fun.

    You're not doing them right, then.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Class D fires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a chemist.

  26. You've been taught EVIL!! by nicodoggie · · Score: 3, Funny

    It has been proven by the Wisest Human on Earth, Dr. Gene Ray that the world is a CUBE!!

    Education vaporized your brain by not being taught the four corners of CUBIC CREATION!!!

    1. Re:You've been taught EVIL!! by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      I believe you may have melted my brain with that link.

    2. Re:You've been taught EVIL!! by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did you click on the "Next Page" link at the bottom of the page? The first page can't really be fathomed without reading the next three pages to form a full four-cornered web-timecube.

      <font color=ff0000><blink><marquee scrolldelay=100>Timecube</marquee><blink></font>

    3. Re:You've been taught EVIL!! by Omestes · · Score: 1

      But why does the time cube have four corners... it wouldn't really be a cube them. Perhaps the "time square" would be more accurate. Why am I bothering critiquing this?

      I do like the "defied queer bit" though, I'm going to have to tell that to all my Christian friends next time we go out drinking.

      This whole webpage reminds me of a slightly less loopy version of a bottle of Dr. Bronner's Magic Soap, but will it clean my hair and make me reek of peppermint?

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    4. Re:You've been taught EVIL!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf!? An interesting mod! haha someone actually took this seriously! :P

  27. Re:thats a lot of sodium...but not quite that much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you may have a dodgy calculator - using your figures, I get:
    10 foot dia = 1.52m radius
    vol = (4/3)*PI*R^3 = 14.8 m^3 = 1.48 * 10^7 cc

    Comes to just over 14 metric tonnes of molten sodium, which is frankly disappointing: I put more than that in a good hot curry.

  28. Came through the Firehose, no less... by R2.0 · · Score: 1

    I gotta wonder if they thought about installing and FM-20 or other extinguisher system in the room, and disabled the sprinklers. If they didn't, someone let me know what building it's in so I can stay away. Far away.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  29. solid core? by Gothmolly · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't you need the solid iron core, so that you have the 2 iron pieces separated by the liquid (sodium) mantle ?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:solid core? by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't you need the solid iron core, so that you have the 2 iron pieces separated by the liquid (sodium) mantle ?

      Not to study the gross effects of turbulent conductive metal. Simple experiments first, complex experiments later.
    2. Re:solid core? by n3umh · · Score: 1

      Correct. Someday it would be cool to try convection , for example, or a conducting inner core (right now ours is hollow stainless and we're using differential rotation to drive the flow.)

      And actually, a solid iron core at 100C temperature is probably not a good model of the Earth's inner core. I'm certainly not an expert on the particular state of iron at Earth's core temperatures and pressures but it's very likely to be non-ferromagnetic. It's certainly above the Curie temperature of iron at ordinary pressures!

      A solid conducting core that wasn't ferromagnetic would be more appropriate. We thought about using copper clad aluminum (may seem odd, but it was for weight reasons) but it just wasn't practical, at least not at first.

  30. Nevermind by R2.0 · · Score: 1

    Oh, never mind - should have RTFA.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  31. More Accurately... by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

    It would be music of the sphere. Singular. Sounds much less enchanting for some reason. Must be an innate preference for plurality.

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
  32. Actually, you can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    use water to put out a sodium fire. Water is pretty impressive at conducting heat away, even if it is reacting at the same time.

    You just have to use a lake-full!

    1. Re:Actually, you can... by Megane · · Score: 2, Informative

      You forgot the link for lake-full.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:Actually, you can... by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      If you search for "sodium lake" on Google video you can see how sodium reacts with a lake!

  33. Liquid Sodium is still neutral in charge. by Jerry · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, how is spinning a neutral liquid metal going to create an electric field?

    Are they hoping that rotating Sodium will be like moving a solid piece of Iron through the magnetic field of the earth, inducing current in the Sodium, which then creates a secondary EMF, which then creates a secondary magnetic field...?

    Without Earth's magnetic field are they lifting themselves by their own bootstraps?

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

    1. Re:Liquid Sodium is still neutral in charge. by pclminion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are they hoping that rotating Sodium will be like moving a solid piece of Iron through the magnetic field of the earth, inducing current in the Sodium, which then creates a secondary EMF, which then creates a secondary magnetic field...? Without Earth's magnetic field are they lifting themselves by their own bootstraps?

      I don't see why it's a problem. The same arguments apply to Earth itself. Could the Earth's magnetic dynamo have formed without the influence of the sun's magnetic field? It's a legitimate part of the question. Also, the universe is hardly empty of magnetic fields. It's not really a stretch to suppose that some "seeding" field was already present.

    2. Re:Liquid Sodium is still neutral in charge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's not really a stretch to suppose that some "seeding" field was already present.

      I wouldn't worry too much about seeding, per se, in that it's possible to build an electric generator without any permanent magnets (or external magnetic field).

      With an electric generator, though, one part is moved past another part (by applying forces to both parts). It seems plausible that magnetic fields could be generated if currents of the molten metal were forced to flow past each other (for example, with mixing). It's unclear to me though whether rotating the containment shell would be sufficient to generate flows within the molten metal.

      Certainly the flow of the molten metal must be important because otherwise they could just spin a solid metal sphere (and dispense with the molten sodium). On the other hand, unless there are currents of molten metal within the sphere then spinning the molten metal sphere will be equivalent to spinning a solid metal sphere.

      With an electric generator force is applied to two different parts of the generator so the electric and magnetic fields are forced to move relative to each other. Presumably one would want the spinning molten metal to move relative to some stationary (non-rotating) fields but I not sure what is supposed to sustain/generate the stationary fields.

      I assume that someone has worked through the math (run some computer simulations) and showed that it has a chance to work. A priori, though, it's not at all clear to me that it would work.

      That's not to say that they shouldn't try: it looks like a very neat experiment.

  34. Why sodium? by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Anyone out there can explain to me why he wouldn't use e.g. Gallium ? Sodium sure isn't the safest stuff to have around molten.

    Andy

    1. Re:Why sodium? by njh · · Score: 3, Informative

      At a guess, price. Metallic sodium cost about $1/kg I think, Gallium costs perhaps $2000/kg.

      Mercury is probably too heavy, Tin is an option, though it needs to be hotter. Finally, metals are different, perhaps sodium is the most like molten iron/nickle in electronic structure or something.

    2. Re:Why sodium? by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "Mercury is probably too heavy"

      More likely too toxic; a liquid sodium spill would be bad, but a spill of that much mercury would have the pantywaists that run this state evacuating the whole county.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    3. Re:Why sodium? by evanbd · · Score: 1

      As you say, I'm sure price is the primary reason. But mercury? You have to be kidding. The toxicity and environmental issues make the sodium look easy to handle. It also costs ~10x the price of sodium per kg, and is 14 times as dense -- so it's 140x as expensive if they care about volume rather than mass (I'm guessing they do, but I don't know). And yes, I know metallic mercury is the least problematic form -- but that doesn't make it harmless, especially in the eyes of safety inspectors and insurance agents. And rightly so; the issues of long-term contamination from a spill on that scale are huge.

    4. Re:Why sodium? by johnny+maxwell · · Score: 1

      Price?

    5. Re:Why sodium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignoring they're from different groups...

      You need about 15,000 liters of the liquid metal.

      One of them costs ~$0.50 a kilogram and has a density of 0.927g/cm^3 and so will cost you about $7000.

      The other costs ~$600 a kilogram and has a density of 6.095g/cm^3 and so will cost you about $55 million.

      Gee, hard choice...

    6. Re:Why sodium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gallium attacks steel via liquid metal embrittlement, so it would be a spectacularly bad choice given that's what the sphere is made of...

    7. Re:Why sodium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some very weak internet research has led me to believe that the price difference between the two metals would be exreme.

      13 Tons of Gallium would roughly be 6.5 Million dollars,

      while 13 Tons of pure sodium would be closer to $20,000

      I know what I would go with.

    8. Re:Why sodium? by n3umh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Three major reasons:

      1)Price. Like others have said, it's a kilobuck a kilogram. Sodium is cheap, they just electrolyze salt in a plant in Niagara Falls where they can get cheap hydro power.

      2) Density. I think a Gallium filled sphere would weigh 95 tons. Our campus structural engineer already had us shore up the floor for this one.

      3) Electrical conductivity. Sodium is a factor of 10 more electrically conductive than Gallium.

    9. Re:Why sodium? by njh · · Score: 1

      Yes, metallic mercury isn't too bad, as long as it doesn't get into the water ways (if it does it is readily converted to methylmercury, nasty stuff). There are gold mining towns that still have mercury puddles lying around after 150 years without significant problems. But they are dry places.

      I agree though: Mercury is expensive, particular given its density (and hence multiplier for volumetric uses). Tin is a similar price.

      (Then there is the whole terror of mercury thing, which is strange considering how much more Hg gets into the environment from coal burning)

    10. Re:Why sodium? by njh · · Score: 1

      3) Electrical conductivity. Sodium is a factor of 10 more electrically conductive than Gallium.

      incidently, what a scale corrections for this are you using? Magnetic reynolds/permitivity etc?

    11. Re:Why sodium? by n3umh · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm not correcting for anything, I'm just not quite right about the number. I was talking about their dimensional electrical conductivities, mhos/meter or whatever, but it's not an order of magnitude.

      Looks like it's just a factor of three different.

      Maybe it's the magnetic Prandtl number that's different by a factor of 10 I guess. That's the ratio of the viscosity to the magnetic diffusivity.

      But of course if we're going to split orders of magnitude I'm going to have to look things up carefully ;-) Suffice it to say that Sodium doesn't have to be driven as hard to achieve the same Magnetic Reynolds number.

  35. Would be interesting to see. by pclminion · · Score: 1

    Sounds like an interesting experiment. However, I have to wonder how accurately it can possibly represent the mechanisms in Earth's core. Just a few things off the top of my head:

    • Density of sodium is nothing like that of iron
    • Conductivity of sodium is different
    • Viscosity of sodium is different
    • Various constants of electromagnetic self-interaction are different for sodium vs. iron
    • The pressure at Earth's core is much larger than anything achievable in this experiment
    • The scale isn't even close

    I wouldn't be surprised if some kind of magnetic dynamo CAN be created on this small scale, but I'd hesitate to directly apply anything learned here to the physics at Earth's core. Still, worth doing. Just be careful with the sodium. Why not use mercury? At least you could do it at room temperature.

    1. Re:Would be interesting to see. by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      Another thought I had is that the effect of the sodium's weight on Earth could perturb the experiment.

      I was originally going to write "the gravitional field from Earth could perturb the experiment", but its not really the field that's the issue. The Earth's magnetic field formed in the Sun's gravitational field. But the Earth's core is in free fall around the sun, so does not feel any weight. (In the Earth's core, down is toward the center. In this experiment, down will be towards some direction outside of the sphere.)

      Similarly, depending on whether they are spinning the sphere on a horizontal or vertical axis, the motion of the sodium through the Earth's gravitational field and/or magnetic field might be different than that of the Earth vs. the Sun.

      Finally, the other issue with pressure is that the sodium will not experience the pressure differential that the various layers of iron in the Earth must experience.

    2. Re:Would be interesting to see. by pclminion · · Score: 1

      I was originally going to write "the gravitional field from Earth could perturb the experiment", but its not really the field that's the issue. The Earth's magnetic field formed in the Sun's gravitational field. But the Earth's core is in free fall around the sun, so does not feel any weight. (In the Earth's core, down is toward the center. In this experiment, down will be towards some direction outside of the sphere.)

      Good point as well. It would be interesting to see the difference in results if the experiment is repeated in free fall (either in orbit, or perhaps more cheaply in a Zero-G Test aircraft)

  36. for added realism by circletimessquare · · Score: 1
    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  37. They're testing it now with water... by dpbsmith · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hope they remember to dry it out before they put in the sodium.

    1. Re:They're testing it now with water... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I hope they remember to dry it out before they put in the sodium.

      Why ? You need a heat source for the whole thing to be authentic, right ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    2. Re:They're testing it now with water... by n3umh · · Score: 1

      We can heat the whole thing up to a temperature as high as 200C after we've drained most of the water. Easy to dry it out.

      Don't worry, Ph.D. doesn't do me much good if I die...

  38. Serving a king? by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    A miniature ball with its own force of gravity. Who else thought this is a Katamari Damacy in the making?!

  39. effects of gravity from other bodies? by Cabriel · · Score: 1

    I noticed the article mentioned the Earth's internal turbulence. Would the way the Sun's and Moon's gravitational pull deform the earth's geometry be a partial cause of turbulence within the earth's molten core?

    If no, why not?

    If yes, is this experiment accounting for something like that?

    Would something like this even have an effect on the magnetic field?

  40. uncertainty of computer simulations by peter303 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Several groups such as Glatzmeir at Harvard have tried computer simulations. Since it is a non-linear, turbelent phenomena they have to make a very small grid with a large number of grid cells. It took 80 days of NSF supercomputer time in the mid-1990s.

    Plus there are some uncertainties:
    (1) The equations of state at the high pressures and temperatures inside the earth arent well known. People have squished minerals in diamond presses or in super-guns to measure the equations of state. However a Berkeley group claims the inner-most core is twice as hot as others claim. A factor of two uncertainty is not good.
    (2) The coupling of elastic equations with magnetic equations is not well thought out either. People have done each independently fairly comprehensively, but not both together.

    The Harvard guy got some interesting results:
    (1) There is an inter-play between the solid inner iron core and liquid iron outer core. The solid holds magnetisation better than the liquid. So he sees over a hundred thousand year simulation a "flickering" as the field looks like it might reverse then really doesnt. Then eventually it reverses about every 40,000 years. This is a little faster than observed in rocks. Currently the earth's magnetic field is abotu 10% weaker than meaured right around 1800. People think is this more likely a "flicker" than an impending reversal, but who knows?
    (2) The model predicted convection spins the whole core once time extra about every 400 years. Convection is driven by both thermal and magnetic force. Seismologists have looked for this "extra core day" and think they have found it. There has been comprehensive global seismic data for about 45 years, or about a tenth of a rotation. Seismologists have see inner core velocity anomalies moving about this rate. You know a theory is really fabulous when it predicts something completely unexpected such as extra core days, and then scientists verify it.

  41. Besides, supercomputers could be used... by rootpassbird · · Score: 0

    to simulate the thing (how novel) and of course, it would run Linux!

    --
    Hackers have long memories. It works both ways.
  42. Chia Earth! by Nullav · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    I just read Slashdot for the articles.
  43. Richter 10 by halfelven · · Score: 1

    I was reminded of the novel "Richter 10" by A. C. Clarke and Mike McQuay, where they use a somewhat similar (albeit much more complex) device to predict earthquakes.

  44. Good for them by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    They actually did have a small file when some leaked out. So I guess they wrote up the report in plaintext...must be nice to have no business-types that need to be impressed with flashy formatting. Plus, accident reports that look like they've been done with a typewriter are cool :)
    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  45. Major flaw in design... by d474 · · Score: 1

    The major flaw in this model's design is gravity, on two levels. One level being that the sphere doesn't exert gravitational effects on itself because it is too small in mass. The other level is that the sphere is under the gravitational pull of the earth.

    The only way to negate the latter would be to put the 10-ft sphere experiment in orbit.

    I'm no geophysicist, but I have a hunch gravity has a huge impact on the equation when it comes to the generation of the Earth's magnetic field.

    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    1. Re:Major flaw in design... by n3umh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "I'm no geophysicist, but I have a hunch gravity has a huge impact on the equation when it comes to the generation of the Earth's magnetic field."

      Only in that the earth's core's flow is driven by convection (both/either thermal and compositional)

      The static pressure field in a fluid cancels out gravitational effects, so in our experiment (I'm one of the graduate students who's been building the thing) there's just a slight increase in pressure as you go deeper in the sodium that doesn't change its electrical or hydrodynamic properties at all.

      In the earth, buoyancy forces are important to stir up the core. In our experiment, we use differential rotation between a pair of spheres to drive the flow. That aspect is not particularly earthlike, but easier to put a lot of energy in.

  46. Re:thats a lot of sodium... Goodness GREATNESS... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Great Balls o' FIRE....

    (well, if he's standing too close..."

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  47. Re:thats a lot of sodium... Considering Permits, by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    One'd think that the cognizant city, state, county, and federal agencies would have building plans prior to issuing permits, and emergency plans for emergency response.

    i would think there'd have been a requirement to install Halon 1301 or its successor/s (but not PKP, due to nasty corrosion effects...) to trip after evacuation of personnel. With all those magnets around, a magnetic trip mechanism could work if mechanical linkages fail or are burned out, releasing the agent.

    (Assumption here) For a fire department to arrive without KNOWING the particulars of the site, and not using time en route to ascertain the particulars is not very effective -- IF that is the case here. Still, employees of such facilities need to be REQUIRED to be first responders.

    http://www.periphman.com/fire/fire-suppression-systems.shtml

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=5vd&q=halon+fire+suppression+system+corrosion&btnG=Search

    But, i know when aboard ship, we were trained that if the helo crashed on our flight deck, and the fuel tanks ruptured and ignited due to friction or electrical ignition, the landing gear (made of alloys... magnesium and or titanium, IIRC) WOULD burn like hell and there was no point in trying to salvage the helo NOR in trying to suppress the fire. The main recourse would be to use a forklift or brute manpower to jettison it. Failing that, the ship would have to make hard rolls at speed (assuming we were underway AT a decent clip) and toss it off that way. Otherwise, the bird would burn down into the hull very quickly and then there'd be NO removal and it would continue to burn down into the hull.

    For INSIDE fires involving exotics, sand and constant water deluge could COOL, but not necessarily extinguish the burning. The danger there is that aboard ship (particularly one not underway (not moving; AT SEA doesn't mean "underway", a ship not making headway (forward movement) is either anchored, station-keeping, or if stopped, "underway with no way on"...), shipping (taking on) huge amounts of shifting ballast (fire-fighting water) could lead to stability issues or restricted maneuvering to keep it inside flooding boundaries or to manage drainage.

    http://www.chaoticsynapticactivity.com/2006/05/17/the-morning-of-the-attack-on-the-uss-stark-ffg-31/

    Fire Fighting Appliances
    http://www.mcaorals.co.uk/Firefighting%20Appliances.htm

    Stability

    At Shipboard Fires
    http://www.marinefirefighting.com/Pages/Newsletters/Newsletter6.htm

    THE IMPACT OF THE USS FORRESTAL'S 1967 FIRE ON UNITED STATES NAVY ...
    http://www.stormingmedia.us/30/3019/A301924.pdf

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  48. Volcano's by rips123 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm. Filling it with liquiid sodium would make some fairly violent volcanoes if a leak ever arises!

  49. Why molten sodium? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    There's a eutectic alloy of sodium and potassium that's liquid at room temperature. I guess they're not using gallium, which is safer than sodium, because it's incompatible with steel.

    1. Re:Why molten sodium? by n3umh · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm fairly certain NaK is a significant autoignition risk compared to Sodium. Sodium at the temperatures we run the experiments at just slowly forms a white oxide crust as it freezes. I think NaK might just catch fire.

      As far as gallium goes, if you've got $100 million dollars to spare and maybe another $5 million to upgrade our floor to take an extra 80 tons of load or so, we can talk ;-) Looks like we'd also have to coat the sphere with something to prevent corrosion, but honestly, we never considered gallium so I didn't even know that ;-)

      It's used in a few smaller MHD experiments (as is the eutectic Galinstan); it's convenient (you can build the experiments out of acrylic) and some labs consider it worth the price, but it really doesn't scale well. Sodium is the way to go for large volume MHD experiments.

  50. apples to oranges by holistic+planet · · Score: 1

    But isn't there a question begging to be asked. Since when is the Earth's core made of sodium? Anyway most of the papers that said you could have used this metal to physically model the Earth's core have been withdrawn. And if you use any iron alloy they lose all magnetic properties when heated to a few hundred degrees C. No one has ever gone beyond this. Oh,I know there are great computer simulations out there, but having done some myself I know that the more complex they become the more they resemble warcraft.