Slashdot Mirror


Bacteria Make Major Evolutionary Shift In the Lab

Auxbuss sends us to New Scientist for news sure to perplex and confound creationists: scientists have watched a new, complex evolutionary trait develop in the lab. "A major evolutionary innovation has unfurled right in front of researchers' eyes. It's the first time evolution has been caught in the act of making such a rare and complex new trait. And because the species in question is a bacterium, scientists have been able to replay history to show how this evolutionary novelty grew from the accumulation of unpredictable, chance events."

36 of 1,185 comments (clear)

  1. Re:First! by hostyle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Turds often float to the surface even in the genetic pool.

    --
    Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
  2. Two words by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny

    Continuous creation. God put those new bacteria there to test my faith ;-)

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Two words by ArcherB · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm willing to concede that there was likely a historical Jesus. But so what? There's more evidence for Mohammed and Joseph Smith, but their mere existence nor their claims or the claims of those who claimed to know them (or claimed to know people who knew them) would convince me that any of these individuals were linked in some way to the Divine. Of course Jesus is real and Divine. Just read your sig. How could Jesus have died approximately 2000 years ago AND be seen on a Moped on I-50 without some Divinity thrown in?
      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    2. Re:Two words by John+Whitley · · Score: 4, Funny

      How could Jesus have died approximately 2000 years ago AND be seen on a Moped on I-50 without some Divinity thrown in? Photoshop?
    3. Re:Two words by Verteiron · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, that's not hypothetical. That's a group called the Christian Scientists (irony abounds), and that is exactly what they do their children.

      Fortunately they're a relatively small group. And if they keep doing as their belief tells them, they'll get smaller still.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    4. Re:Two words by Idiomatick · · Score: 3, Funny

      ahh evolution at work. I wish it were faster though.

    5. Re:Two words by Mr.+Beatdown · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thanks for the car analogy. I was starting to get a little lost there.

      --
      My fellow Americans, let's restore the death penalty for child rapists. Let's do it . . . for the children.
    6. Re:Two words by Micah · · Score: 4, Funny

      > How do you rationalize the 6000year issue?

      Easy. The days in Genesis 1 are long ages of time. In fact Gleason Archer, probably the best Hebrew scholar of modern times, has argued that the way the text is worded rules out the calendar-day theory. Also there are demonstrable gaps in the genealogies, so I have no problem with humans being on earth tens of thousands of years.

      When you look at the whole Bible, including everything it says on Creation, it describes Big Bang cosmology fairly accurately (well not the science of the BB itself of course, but the effects of a BB universe).

      > Wouldn't it be easier to take it from a new standpoint ... look at the world then the book and decide whether or not its needed?

      I've done that, and to me the Bible describes reality more consistently than other worldviews.

    7. Re:Two words by Half+a+dent · · Score: 3, Funny

      there is no soul Sure there is and James Brown is its Godfather!
  3. Let me be the first to say... by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a miracle!

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    1. Re:Let me be the first to say... by zach_d · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's clear evidence of a noodley appendage!

    2. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Cypher04 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Praise Jebus!

      --
      "If my doctor told me I had only six minutes to live, I wouldn't brood. I'd type a little faster." --Isaac Asimov
    3. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's a miracle! Hmmm that doesn't sound right. Let's see...

      It's alive, Igor! It's ALIVE! There. Much better.
  4. Re:First! by spun · · Score: 4, Funny

    And getting first post on Slashdot improves your chances to reproduce how, exactly? No offense, but I think you may be an evolutionary dead end.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  5. Quote from article: by Izabael_DaJinn · · Score: 5, Funny
    "In the meantime, the experiment stands as proof that evolution does not always lead to the best possible outcome."

    Wasn't that already proven with the rise of homo sapiens?

    --
    Careful What You Wish For....
  6. Or alternately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    God performs miracle of transformation on bacteria right before the eyes of watching scientists, yet they still refuse to believe in Him.

    Okay... I was just saying :(

  7. Re:Remember... by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 4, Funny

    To bacteria, that means "It'll happen eight times before Thursday."

    I can't wait for God's press release on this one.

    --
    I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
  8. Ha! This is just how God test his flock. by viking80 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ha! God let the devil do this so he can test who are the real faithful, and who are the unfaithful to be smitten.

    --
    don't cut it off www.mgmbill.org
    1. Re:Ha! This is just how God test his flock. by seanonymous · · Score: 3, Funny

      Without the smitten, it would be hard for a species to evolve.

    2. Re:Ha! This is just how God test his flock. by lesinator · · Score: 2, Funny

      God should test his flock with LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB, just like everyone else....

  9. Re:Perplex and Confound? by slashname3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    We are not bacteria! We are not bacteria! We are not monkeys! I mean we are not bacteria!

    You can't even see a bacteria with your own eye, so this can't be real.

  10. Re:NOOOOOOOOO! by Taibhsear · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's as if six thousand voices cried out at once and their arguments were suddenly silenced... Fixed that for you.
  11. Re:Never Be Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Too bad this evidence still won't be enough to make creationists change their minds . There was a problem with your sentence. I have highlighted it and request that you fix it.
  12. Doesn't disprove creationism by Ngarrang · · Score: 1, Funny

    This doesn't prove or disprove Evolution (not the big E) or creationism. The bacterium merely adapted to their environment, the evolved (little e), which creationist have no problem with. The presence of Citrate aided at some level in the tiny changes to each successive generation until those changes resulted in the ability to digest citrate.

    Show me how how the leafy sea dragon developed its leafiness and I might just start to believe in Evolution (with a big E), othewise, you are just seeing persistent change from generation to generation that eventually produces something useful.

    Or, maybe if the bacterium suddenly developed the ability to feed on their glass petri dishes.

    Otherwise, neither side should be to quick to exclaim or disclaim anything.

    --
    Bearded Dragon
  13. Re:Remember... by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't wait for God's press release on this one.
    Blah-blah-blah revolutionary E. Coli version 2.0 blah-blah-blah flexibly interoperate blah-blah-blah leverage synergies blah-blah-blah best-of-breed blah-blah-blah exciting new environmental opportunities blah-blah-blah...
    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  14. Re:This is why ... by rho · · Score: 2, Funny

    At some point in the next few decades we will have an outbreak of a supper bug that can not be defeated

    I for one...

    --
    Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
  15. Re:Keep it up and it won't be a "theory" by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 2, Funny
    I read your post and find myself singing:

    I'm just a bill.
    Yes, I'm only a bill.
    And I'm sitting here on Capitol Hill.
    Well, it's a long, long journey
    To the capital city.
    It's a long, long wait
    While I'm sitting in committee,
    But I know I'll be a law some day
    At least I hope and pray that I will
    But today I am still just a bill.

    --
    Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
  16. Re:First! by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually it sucks. Now the lime won't kill the bacteria on the beer bottle.

    --
    What?
  17. Perplexed and confounded by iliketrash · · Score: 2, Funny

    "perplex and confound creationists"

    _Nothing_ perplexes or confounds creationists.,

  18. Re:First! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Actually it sucks. Now the lime won't kill the bacteria on the beer bottle.

    First off, if you're putting a lime on your beer bottle, you're doing it wrong.

    Secondly, if your opened beer bottle still contains beer over the course of the hours it takes for bacteria to colonize it (lime or no lime), you're doing it really wrong.

  19. Re:This is why ... by eln · · Score: 3, Funny

    I, for one, prefer to regard everything on the planet as being covered in a thin fecal veneer. While I, being a more proactive sort, prefer to spend my days covering everything on the planet in a thin fecal veneer. It's nice to know someone has finally noticed my work.
  20. Re:First! by Jade+E.+2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually it sucks. Now the lime won't kill the bacteria on the beer bottle. Yeah, you'll have to put something else in your beer to kill them. Alcohol, maybe.
  21. Re:Young earth creationists believe in evolution.. by pluther · · Score: 4, Funny

    There is no difference between "microevolution" and "macroevolution" - except to people with agends, and those who don't know what they're talking about.

    Since we haven't had a good car analogy in this thread yet:

    Microevolution would be if you drive your car across town. This has been proven so many times that by now everyone accepts it as true.

    Macroevolution would be if you could drive your car all the way to another country. This is, as everyone in America knows, impossible.

    Come to think of it, this analogy could help explain why they hardly ever have these kinds of debates in Europe, too...

    --
    If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
  22. Re:First! by mako1138 · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, they're not random. The Flying Spaghetti Monster reached out with His Noodly Appendage and blessed the bacteria. Ramen.

  23. Re:First! by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 3, Funny

    If Intelligent Design were not so analogous to Military Intelligence, I might make the effort to click the link. Then again, my mind is not so open that my brain is in danger of falling out.

  24. That rules out american beer then. by Viol8 · · Score: 2, Funny

    What does sex in a boat and yankee beer have in common?

    They're both f***** close to water.