Geohashing Meets an Angry Rancher With Firearms
katicli writes "Geohashing, an obscure xkcd pastime which involves going to random coordinates generated by md5 hashing, the date, and the opening status of the stock market, appears to have just gotten far more interesting. The official wiki reports a warning for other geohashers intending to go to the spot designated for June 14th in the San Francisco area, as several avid fans of xkcd were met by an angry rancher and firearms."
I just don't trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn't die.
Check out "trespassing" in Common Law. Your "reality" is caused by your countrymen's sheer lawlesness. Fix them, you fix the problem.
You're talking to the wrong audience here. Those clowns are nerds. They're cowards. They are mortally afraid of firearms because they are terribly scared of (SHOCK! HORROR!) being hurt by someone. And yet, not a day passes that they don't imagine themselves as some gun-toting hero from some stupid FPS. But they know full well that they could never, ever, stomach to be in a REAL rebellion. They would shit their pants. They would cower. That's why they hate you. That's why they put down anyone with a practical mind. Because they remind them of their own inadequacy. Ignore them. Life has beaten them up. Their faces still smell of shit.
Frosty piss posts are worthless, GNAA posts are worthless and hurtful, but they are the least of this site's neuroses.
By the account on xkcd's wiki page now:
- the meeting was NOT on private property, it was in a public place.
- the attendees did NOT venture onto private property.
- the other side of the road from where they were, was private property, owned by someone who drove up, with guns in sight, and proceeded to take photos of their numberplates (without permission, one presumes)
(this is all taken/derived from the wiki entry.)
I can't vouch for the behaviour of the meeting attendees, but by all means the property owner acted like an asshat, in an intimidating fashion. However the dialogue went, arriving with guns (and note, NOT on his own property) is not a cordial way to start investigating what is going on.
This is news to slashdot, perhaps the headline should read "Warning to geohashers: outsider-hating, gun-toting rednecks may crash your meeting on public property and take photographs of you or your vehicles without permission, because they 'don't take kindly to your kinda people round these parts'"
It is truly sad to know that there are people out there that feel they need to carry a gun to chase off a few kids from their property. This shows a complete lack of normal reasoning skills, and because of that, they should not be allowed to carry a gun in the first place.
Do you think it is a good idea to let a mentally handicapped person carry a gun for self-protection?
I mean seriously guys, how scared must you be do rely on a lethal weapon to protect yourself from a bunch of geeks?
I know that in this case they may not have had actually been armed during the confrontation, but there are many posts defending them.
Actually, to anyone but a gun nut it is a device with one purpose to kill or injure. What type of seld delusion leads you to try and make a case for any other purpose. Ah US citizenship-of course.
I think you need to study ballistics a little more.
VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!