Computer Scientists Scour Your Holiday Photos
Barence writes "Hundreds of thousands of images on Flickr are being used to teach a program to determine the geographic location of an image, simply by looking at it. The program attempts to mimic the way that humans can deduce the location of an image by searching for visual clues, such as similarities to pictures or locations they have seen previously. In its current state it can guess the location of a photo to within 200km, 16% of the time — extremely accurate given the complexity of the problem."
16% percent of the time it works every time.
Dude, that's as accurate as my girlfriends map navigation. *sigh*
War is the statesman's game, the priest's delight, the lawyer's jest, the hired assassin's trade.- Shelley
Show it a picture of the andromeda galaxy and throw its statistics way off.
If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
Wait, don't tell me, let me guess where you're from ...
of the time...
(Not counting those rich bastards who can afford taking a holiday on the ISS).
Where's Goatse?
Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
Scientists surprised to discover it is possible for a machine to loose will to live.
It's a for loop that spits out "Your mom's basement".
OsamaBinLaden2001 has deleted his account
Yes, I meant through the Earth distance and yes I did manage to use the radius.
That will teach me to post before drinking my coffee...
Yes, because there aren't 746 helicopters flying over it.
So it's actually less accurate than if it just guessed? :)
What they find:
I'd like to present this with Moon landing pictures to see where the moon landing was staged! (hahaha... love it)
No, I think you're misunderstanding how this works.
Given that there are 6 locations where all (or nearly all) of the pictures being used were taken,
Deriving from this that the probability of getting any 1 of these right by random guessing is 1 in 6,
Given that the accuracy averaged over 200 pictures is slightly less than 1 in 6,
The computer does slightly worse than chance.
However, my guess is that the first given is not entirely correct ;-)
Dan Aris
Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
It's like answering 'True' in a multiple choice test!
:3 rawr.
point a) Halfway between NY and Washington DC
point b) Halfway between London and Paris
This should give them a better than one-in-three chance of being correct to within 200km, as long as their program can take a decent stab at guessing which of the two sets is the more likely....
"Be light, stinging, insolent and melancholy"