Slashdot Mirror


DoE-Sponsored Project Readies Human Trial For Artificial Retinas

An anonymous reader writes "'The blind will see again,' could be the motto of the Artificial Retina Project, which is getting ready to implant a 60-pixel artificial retina chip into 10 blind patients later this year. 60-pixels doesn't sound like much, but the 1st gen artificial retina brought tears to the eyes of its six recipients, who claim they can now count large objects with just 16-pixels. If all goes well, a 200-pixel retina will be ready in three years; the chip used is of a 1.2-micron CMOS process, with both power and video supplied wirelessly." (And this is sponsored by the Department of Energy for what reason?)

9 of 82 comments (clear)

  1. In other news, by pwnies · · Score: 5, Funny

    "...wirelessly transmits images to a belt pack containing a microprocessor that processes the video signal" In other news, the encryption scheme for these devices was broken. The only side effect is the blind with these implants have reported seeing a smiley face with the words, "I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes" circling around the face.

    1. Re:In other news, by Amouth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      +1 for perfect refrence

      i was thinking the same thing when i read that

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  2. Still a long way from sci-fi by kiehlster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is nearing the equivalent of Jordi LaForge's visor. In fact, we could probably create a cheap version of it with a little product design. From what I saw of the 1st-gen, it makes the patient look like a total geek with a web cam over their eye. Not much better than a kid wearing a gauze eye-patch. Even MIT's newer wearable computer enthusiasts are more attractive. But to really match sci-fi, we need to approach the idea of detaching the eye and replacing it with a fully functional robotic implant. At least we're seeing some progress. It's amazing how far it is in comparison to paralysis treatment.

    1. Re:Still a long way from sci-fi by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Even MIT's newer wearable computer enthusiasts are more attractive.

      Why on earth would anyone want to wear a computer enthusiast? Is this some extreme form of on-demand tech support? Also, I'm highly skeptical of the claim that computer enthusiasts coming out of MIT, no matter how new, are attractive.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Still a long way from sci-fi by neokushan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't care how geeky I look, if I lose my eyesight I'll wear whatever is required to see again.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    3. Re:Still a long way from sci-fi by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't care how geeky I look, if I lose my eyesight I'll wear whatever is required to see again.

      On a serious note, I completely agree, yet at the same time would be very leery of doing so. The main reason? Upgrade paths. They've got a 60-pixel retina they're trying now. Much better than being blind, but much worse than the next gen which will have 4,000 pixels, then there'll be a 64k pixel one, and then the multi-megapixel eyes after that. And then they'll come out with one that not only approximates full human vision, but gives you Geordi LaForge-like super-vision as well. But alas, I can't get that one, because the upgrade to the 64k pixel eye required splicing directly into my optic nerve and now they don't have enough to work with.

      So basically I wouldn't be completely comfortable with it until it reached the nearly-normal stage (and I'll just live without the super-vision upgrade), but realistically, it very well may not be at that point when I actually need it. This would make an otherwise no-brainer (see vs not see) a lot tougher.

      Not that I'm complaining. This is fantastic news.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:Still a long way from sci-fi by Alsee · · Score: 4, Funny

      .: )

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  3. DOE by dietlein · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And this is sponsored by the Department of Energy for what reason?

    For the same reason the Department of Commerce is responsible for our atomic clocks?

    Seriously though, the DOC, DOE, etc., each have a variety of national labs, each of which have many areas of research. I'd suppose the DOE's expertise in high-reliability sensors (for light and all other wavelengths of radiation) is one reason why they mesh well with this project.
  4. One person who could really have used this by techno-vampire · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wish this had been developed in time for Dan Alderson to have gotten one. The last two years he was at JPL, I was his "seeing eye person" because diabetic retinopathy had ruined his vision. Jerry Pournelle once dedicated a book to him, calling him "the sane genius." Among other things, Dan wrote the navigation software that was used by Project Voyager, and he was still doing things that most programmers would have sworn were impossible when his health failed completely and he was forced to retire.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting