Slashdot Mirror


DoE-Sponsored Project Readies Human Trial For Artificial Retinas

An anonymous reader writes "'The blind will see again,' could be the motto of the Artificial Retina Project, which is getting ready to implant a 60-pixel artificial retina chip into 10 blind patients later this year. 60-pixels doesn't sound like much, but the 1st gen artificial retina brought tears to the eyes of its six recipients, who claim they can now count large objects with just 16-pixels. If all goes well, a 200-pixel retina will be ready in three years; the chip used is of a 1.2-micron CMOS process, with both power and video supplied wirelessly." (And this is sponsored by the Department of Energy for what reason?)

29 of 82 comments (clear)

  1. In other news, by pwnies · · Score: 5, Funny

    "...wirelessly transmits images to a belt pack containing a microprocessor that processes the video signal" In other news, the encryption scheme for these devices was broken. The only side effect is the blind with these implants have reported seeing a smiley face with the words, "I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes" circling around the face.

    1. Re:In other news, by Amouth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      +1 for perfect refrence

      i was thinking the same thing when i read that

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    2. Re:In other news, by dunnius · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I was laughing, man!

  2. Still a long way from sci-fi by kiehlster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is nearing the equivalent of Jordi LaForge's visor. In fact, we could probably create a cheap version of it with a little product design. From what I saw of the 1st-gen, it makes the patient look like a total geek with a web cam over their eye. Not much better than a kid wearing a gauze eye-patch. Even MIT's newer wearable computer enthusiasts are more attractive. But to really match sci-fi, we need to approach the idea of detaching the eye and replacing it with a fully functional robotic implant. At least we're seeing some progress. It's amazing how far it is in comparison to paralysis treatment.

    1. Re:Still a long way from sci-fi by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Even MIT's newer wearable computer enthusiasts are more attractive.

      Why on earth would anyone want to wear a computer enthusiast? Is this some extreme form of on-demand tech support? Also, I'm highly skeptical of the claim that computer enthusiasts coming out of MIT, no matter how new, are attractive.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Still a long way from sci-fi by neokushan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't care how geeky I look, if I lose my eyesight I'll wear whatever is required to see again.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    3. Re:Still a long way from sci-fi by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't care how geeky I look, if I lose my eyesight I'll wear whatever is required to see again.

      On a serious note, I completely agree, yet at the same time would be very leery of doing so. The main reason? Upgrade paths. They've got a 60-pixel retina they're trying now. Much better than being blind, but much worse than the next gen which will have 4,000 pixels, then there'll be a 64k pixel one, and then the multi-megapixel eyes after that. And then they'll come out with one that not only approximates full human vision, but gives you Geordi LaForge-like super-vision as well. But alas, I can't get that one, because the upgrade to the 64k pixel eye required splicing directly into my optic nerve and now they don't have enough to work with.

      So basically I wouldn't be completely comfortable with it until it reached the nearly-normal stage (and I'll just live without the super-vision upgrade), but realistically, it very well may not be at that point when I actually need it. This would make an otherwise no-brainer (see vs not see) a lot tougher.

      Not that I'm complaining. This is fantastic news.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:Still a long way from sci-fi by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You could always do one eye at a time :)

    5. Re:Still a long way from sci-fi by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Honestly, depending on the tech available at the time, I would be glad to donate one of my good eyes to someone wealthier than I in exchange for enough cash to purchase an eye that could see at multiple wavelengths. Bonus points if I can wirelessly transmit the output from the eye to hardware and it can run off the glucose in my body.

    6. Re:Still a long way from sci-fi by Alsee · · Score: 3, Funny

      You could always do one eye at a time :)

      Oh yeah smarty pants?
      Ok, so you get your first generation 60 pixels, and you get your second generation unit, and your third generation unit, but then what the hell do you do about the fourth generation unit then? Huh? Huh smarty pants?

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    7. Re:Still a long way from sci-fi by Alsee · · Score: 4, Funny

      .: )

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    8. Re:Still a long way from sci-fi by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you lose your eyesight, the "vision centers" in your brain will begin to atrophy, and you'll lose the mental capacity to process images.

      Best to "exercise" those areas as much as possible. Once those nerves die, they're gone for good. Figure out how to grow those back, and you'll nearly have achieved the holy grail of medicine.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  3. DOE by dietlein · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And this is sponsored by the Department of Energy for what reason?

    For the same reason the Department of Commerce is responsible for our atomic clocks?

    Seriously though, the DOC, DOE, etc., each have a variety of national labs, each of which have many areas of research. I'd suppose the DOE's expertise in high-reliability sensors (for light and all other wavelengths of radiation) is one reason why they mesh well with this project.
    1. Re:DOE by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Informative

      For the same reason the Department of Commerce is responsible for our atomic clocks?

      Standard weights and measures are vital for commerce. It's logical that the Department of Commerce is responsible for our official measurements of time.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  4. One person who could really have used this by techno-vampire · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wish this had been developed in time for Dan Alderson to have gotten one. The last two years he was at JPL, I was his "seeing eye person" because diabetic retinopathy had ruined his vision. Jerry Pournelle once dedicated a book to him, calling him "the sane genius." Among other things, Dan wrote the navigation software that was used by Project Voyager, and he was still doing things that most programmers would have sworn were impossible when his health failed completely and he was forced to retire.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
    1. Re:One person who could really have used this by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You: I was a seeing eye dog...


      No! I was a seeing eye person! Dan didn't need me to lead him around, he still had enough sight for that. He needed me to read monitors, type, and do other things that needed sharp sight.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:One person who could really have used this by Elrond,+Duke+of+URL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Doesn't exactly seem like the most glamorous lab job, but the potential for learning seems amazing.

      "So, what did you do after college?

      "I personally helped a genius for two years."

      Heck, even if he told you to not ask questions, you could probably absorb a surprising amount just being close by.

      --
      Elrond, Duke of URL
      "This is the most fun I've had without being drenched in the blood of my enemies!"-Sam&Max
  5. Why the DOE? by jeffmeden · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps because the DOE has a dedicated Office of Science, of which the Office of Biological & Environmental Research is a member? Gosh, that was hard to pick out of the very first link you posted.
    Or, in a more snide retort: (And this is sponsored by the Department of Energy for what reason?)
    Because the US Department of Fucked Up Eyeballs was out to lunch the day of the planning meeting.

  6. 16 pixels? 60 pixels? What? by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Forgive me for asking, but even simple webcams are now 0.3 megapixels... so why are these artificial retinas so low on the pixel count?

    1. Re:16 pixels? 60 pixels? What? by MindStalker · · Score: 3, Informative

      its 16 neural brain connections, not necessarily 16 pixel camera.

    2. Re:16 pixels? 60 pixels? What? by PieSquared · · Score: 3, Informative

      My guess is because of the difficulty in connecting 300,000+ (how exactly is color encoded for the brain?) wires/electrodes to the optical nerve (or directly to the brain?) accurately in a confined space.

      --
      Does a line appended to your comment give your post meaning in and of itself, or only in relation to those without?
    3. Re:16 pixels? 60 pixels? What? by kiehlster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      because of the difficulty in connecting 300,000+ (how exactly is color encoded for the brain?) wires/electrodes to the optical nerve
      That is precisely the reason, but I wonder why they don't mix in some stem cell research with their bio-informatics to essentially grow the connections in place. We can grow flesh, so it might be possible to manipulate it to bond with the electrodes. Perhaps the electrodes are just too big to fit a small fortune in the eye.
    4. Re:16 pixels? 60 pixels? What? by icegreentea · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe it's because they want to have a working model NOW and not in 10/20 years. I believe what you're describing is what we call feature creep. Better to get the core idea down first. As for why its only 60 pixels. Part of it certainly is power and size. They had enough trouble fitting 60 pixels worth of sensors and processing and power in. Getting more in is going to be hard.

    5. Re:16 pixels? 60 pixels? What? by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You know, it would be really great if /. armchair scientists were really in an armchair watching science reports like it was a football game. Then you could see how ridiculous you're being:

      Announcer: Dr. Hausinsphincter steps back, takes the chip, and inserts it into the eye of the patient.

      Announcer #2: That's an equivalent 60 pixel chip I believe he's trying there Bob. /. Know It All: 60 pixels! Awww what? Come on Hausinsphincter grow a pair! That's fucking rediculous! Get some of those stem cell's in on that shit and grow those connections!

      Announcer: And now the patient is trying out the chip. Looks like he can see large objects, but no reading for him yet Carl.

      Announcer #2: That's right Bob. Maybe in a few years. /. Know It All: Well thank you VERY MUCH Hausinsphincter! That's $300 I didn't need. Dammit...wonder what's on the Linux Kernel Update channel....

  7. Which DOE? by ultraexactzz · · Score: 2, Funny

    And Here I am thinking it was the Department of Eyesight. Seemed rather logical, actually.

    --
    Never underestimate the potential of Human stupidity. -Heinlein
  8. Re:Retinitis Pigmentosa by m-kirkcaldie · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unless it has developed recently, that sounds more like standard red-green colour blindness - which is a genetic defect and not a progressive degeneration.

  9. There's no cure for blindness by Thelasko · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you go to a doctor and tell him that you're blind, they say, "Hey, why don't you get this dog to drag your blind ass around?" What kind of cure is that?
    Chris Rock

    I for one welcome our cyborg overlords!
    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  10. artificial retina brought tears to the eyes of 6.. by objekt · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...thereby causing a short circuit in their newly implanted retinas.

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  11. Re:+(funniest thing this year) by Alsee · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't think that you see where this is going

    I'm not blind to the possibilities.

      )

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.