Slashdot Mirror


FBI's New Eye Scan Database Raising Eyebrows

mattnyc99 writes "The FBI has confirmed to Popular Mechanics that it's not only adding palm prints to its criminal records, but preparing to balloon its repository of photos, which an agency official says 'could be the basis for our facial recognition.' It's all part of a new biometric software system that could store millions of iris scans within 10 years and has privacy advocates crying foul. Quoting: 'The FBI's Next Generation Identification (NGI) system, which could cost as much as $1 billion over its 10-year life cycle, will create an unprecedented database of biometric markers, such as facial images and iris scans. For criminal investigators, NGI could be as useful as DNA some day — a distinctive scar or a lopsided jaw line could mean the difference between a cold case and closed one. And for privacy watchdogs, it's a dual threat — seen as a step toward a police state, and a gold mine of personal data waiting to be plundered by cybercriminals.'"

5 of 229 comments (clear)

  1. Blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The DMV and the US government already have my picture (passport). Why should I give a shit if the FBI has it or has access to it?

  2. test subjects by jhines · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They should use the politicians that control the agency, and the upper level bosses in the agency, as the first test subjects. Not that they have anything to hide, but I'm guessing they wouldn't like it in this case.

  3. Re:Hold up by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nevermind someone hacking the FBI DB - what if some data entry monkey just screws up their data entry?

    "And now, entering data for serial killer John Doe, III" while having the record open for Jon Do, II. How will this be changed? Updated?

    I have a trivial mistake in my passport file (they have the wrong passport labeled as lost), and it is costing me 2 hours at immigration every time I fly. I have checked, and it is not possible to correct it. I fear to think what would happen with a more serious mistake. I'm pretty sure there'd be a lengthy trial involved, if not outright conviction and lengthy appeal.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  4. Re:Yes, where is this technology outsourced from?. by gnick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anybody notice the mention of Lockheed Martin in the original article?

    Really? Is more outsourcing of sensitive government tasks the way to go? Have we learned nothing from experience...

    The federal government outsources just about all of their sensitive science and engineering. Sandia National Lab is run by Lockheed Martin. LANL and LLNL are also run by contractors. Nothing new.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  5. Eyeglasses an advantage! by plasmacutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    looks like all us "four-eyes" are going to have an extra modicum of privacy.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!