Slashdot Mirror


What Do You Want On Future Browsers?

Coach Wei writes "An industry wishlist for future browsers has been collected and developed by OpenAjax Alliance. Using wiki as an open collaboration tool, the feature list now lists 37 separate feature requests, covering a wide range of technology areas, such as security, Comet, multimedia, CSS, interactivity, and performance. The goal is to inform the browser vendors about what the Ajax developer community feels are most important for the next round of browsers (i.e., FF4, IE9, Safari4, and Opera10) and to provide supplemental details relative to the feature requests. Currently, the top three voted features are: 2D Drawing/Vector Graphics, The Two HTTP Connection Limit Issue, and HTML DOM Operation Performance In General . OpenAjax Alliance is calling for everyone to vote for his/her favorite features. The alliance also strongly encourages people to comment on the wiki pages for each of the existing features and to add any important new features that are not yet on the list." On a related note, an anonymous reader writes "The Tao of Mac has put up pretty interesting list of five things that are still wrong with browsers these days, and I have to wonder — with things like AIR starting to be accepted by developers, do we still need the browser at all?"

15 of 628 comments (clear)

  1. Personally I want... by Verdatum · · Score: 4, Funny

    Laserbeams....oh yeah...and Ninjas!!!

    1. Re:Personally I want... by andrewd18 · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, no, you want frickin' ninjas with frickin' laser beams on their heads. That's obviously superior to individual ninjas and laser beams.

    2. Re:Personally I want... by Zencyde · · Score: 5, Funny

      Laser beams? Hell, I want porn! Porn with frickin' laser beams!

      --
      What day is it? Could you please tell me?
    3. Re:Personally I want... by ultranova · · Score: 3, Funny

      Laser beams? Hell, I want porn! Porn with frickin' laser beams!

      Word of warning: I've seen it, and it ain't pretty.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  2. Force feedback by nuzak · · Score: 4, Funny

    Teledildonics. Mmm.

    --
    Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    1. Re:Force feedback by dedazo · · Score: 3, Funny

      That will take a while. But in the meantime, here's the best next thing.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    2. Re:Force feedback by OzPeter · · Score: 3, Funny

      I. Am. Now. Officially. Scared. I thought you were putting up a joke link. Ugggghhhh.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  3. Why only 2D Vectors? by StCredZero · · Score: 4, Funny

    Give me 3D vector graphics, and let me play Battlezone in the browser!

  4. FF3 by pla$+!k · · Score: 5, Funny

    Firefox 3 ought to be enough for everybody

  5. Re:I want what most users want. by Angostura · · Score: 5, Funny

    You'll be wanting Lynx, my friend.

  6. Re:Fast and clean by Daimanta · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Fast and clean"

    Guess what ideal webbrowser and ideal hookers have in common.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
  7. Modular design by lazyDog86 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think that you have to make the design modular so the ninjas can be made available either with or without laser beams. While we're at it, we will really need an open standard bus supporting ninja-laser interconnectivity. I should think that we could interest an IEEE working group in such an activity. It's important that we develop a generic enough command set so that our ninjas and lasers can interact with as rich a set of other devices as possible. (i.e. ninja-laser-television-beer cooler interoperability would be high on my list)

    --
    my insights may be modded Funny, but at least some of my jokes are modded Insightful
  8. Pffft! Real men don't need Lynx. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Funny

    $ telnet www.google.com 80

    nuff said.

  9. Re:stability? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow I didn't.

    *click*
    *click*
    *click*
    *click**click**click**click**click**click**click**click**click**click*

    Mmmmmmm. I need a moment...alone...

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  10. Re:I want what most users want. by eldepeche · · Score: 5, Funny

    Basically, it would be really nice to never leave your web browser because all the functionality is there.

    Have you considered Emacs?