ICQ Starts Blocking Alternative Clients
An anonymous reader writes "It appears that since yesterday ICQ has blocked access to the ICQ network to alternative clients. Users of QIP, Adium, and other clients are getting a 'The client version you are using is too old. Please upgrade'. No comment yet from ICQ or AOL."
That said, the forum thread is interesting. Looks like the ICQ admins are censoring posts.
Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
What I like is if you go to the tech forum on ICQ referred to in initial post you'll see that most if not all workarounds have been edited out by ICQ....nice.
Unix, an obscure operating system developed by bored researchers in an attempt to get a better game playing experience.
Well at least I know why I wasn't connecting to ICQ earlier.
I stopped using ICQ earlier this year when my low-seven digit account number was hijacked. ICQ provides ZERO methods of getting hijacked accounts back.
I'll miss ICQ when they shut it down. I haven't gotten a real message from it in years (I think - I don't really pay attention to which service in Kopete I'm getting messages from), but I can't bring myself to stop connecting.
I have a very low 7-digit ID from right after it came out. It was pretty cool to be able to randomly chat with friends without having to log into an IRC channel and wait for them to remember to come online. One time I even bought a girl a computer for Valentine's Day just so I could talk to her while I was at my ISP tech support job; we ended up getting married.
ICQ sucks and it's spammy and doesn't do anything cool, but there's a lot of nostalgia in that crusty old system. I'll be sad the day when my login stops working for the last time.
Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
ICQ is irrelevant. It will be absorbed.
-jcr
The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
In Russia too. Here, there is no "IM", there is ICQ. I will send you that via ICQ, do you have his ICQ, you were not on ICQ so I thought you were out of office, etc etc etc. And this is very sad.
> by requiring "friends" to be added before messaging.
That functionality was in ICQ since the very first version.
It's simple to kow your character by your choice of messenger-client:
- ICQ: Pro, uses IM since the very beginning. Most likely uses a multi-protocol client, because not all of his friends are pros, Likes the ICQ network because he's used to have everything and configure everything.
- AIM: Too stupid for a real messenger. Does think there's no use for a history or offline-messages becase he never could use them. Allows a maximum of three words per message.
- MSN: Lazy default user. Uses IE and whatever came with his computer. Has yet to send a message without at least one of his thousand animated smilies in it.
- IRC: Geek who thinks messengers are just bad IRC clones and IRC is already perfect. Lost his best friend because he sent him a html-mail wich even contained an image. This was too much for him.
- Y!M: Huh? What? Yahoo has a messenger? Okay, I only know one girl there, so I can't tell...
- Jabber / Google Talk: Either someone between the geeky IRC-user and the pro-ICQ-user who upgraded to newer and freer (is that a word?) technologies, or a Mac-user who happens to design websites for a living.
Okay, and there are users who choose their client/network by peer pressure.
Go on! Prove me wrong! (Meaning that more than 25% of the users don't fit my statements. One singe example proves nothing. ;)
P.S.: If you now want to scream that I have a bias, read up some stuff about physics, human sensors and the brain, and then realize that your "non-biased-information" just happens to match your own bias. ;)
P.P.S.: I use Miranda under Wine, connected to IRC, ICQ, Jabber, AIM and MSN... Go figure...
Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
....
email...?
I got you an Andes mint, but it melted in my pocket
Uh-oh! ... memories...