Slashdot Mirror


Claimed Proof of Riemann Hypothesis

An anonymous reader writes "Xian-Jin Li claims to have proven the Riemann hypothesis in this preprint on the arXiv." We've mentioned recent advances in the search for a proof but if true, I'm told this is important stuff. Me, I use math to write dirty words on my calculator.

22 of 345 comments (clear)

  1. Dirty Words by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 5, Funny

    Me, I use math to write dirty words on my calculator.

    Such as 80085?

    1. Re:Dirty Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      5318008

    2. Re:Dirty Words by UnknowingFool · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, you mean 5318008 or for the slashdot crowd, 55378008

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re:Dirty Words by Directrix1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That would've been a lot cooler if Slashdot supported Unicode.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    4. Re:Dirty Words by andy19 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Coming from a Slashdotter, are you surprised?

    5. Re:Dirty Words by droopycom · · Score: 5, Funny

      You just gave me the best idea for an iPhone app:

      Boobies that bounce according to how the phone is bouncing....

    6. Re:Dirty Words by DFENS619 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

  2. Yeah but did they point this out? by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 5, Funny

    By using Fourier analysis on number fields, we prove in this paper E. Bombieri's refinement of A. Weil's positivity condition, which implies the Riemann hypothesis for the Riemann zeta function in the spirit of A. Connes' approach to the Riemann hypothesis. Weather permitting of course. (Just looking on the positivity side)

    1. Re:Yeah but did they point this out? by rdwald · · Score: 5, Funny

      By using Fourier analysis on number fields, we prove in this paper E. Bombieri's refinement of A. Weil's positivity condition, which implies the Riemann hypothesis for the Riemann zeta function in the spirit of A. Connes' approach to the Riemann hypothesis.

      Weather permitting of course. (Just looking on the positivity side)

      I thought you were randomly babbling, but then I RTFA and realized you were just quoting it...

    2. Re:Yeah but did they point this out? by colonslashslash · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wait... both of you RTFA?

      We have a new /. record!

      --
      She's built like a steak house, but she handles like a bistro....
  3. Tried to RTFA by multipartmixed · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man, where's Charles Eppes when you need something explained to you in layman's terms?

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    1. Re:Tried to RTFA by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ummm...I think that WAS layman's terms. For you math geeks, try being a history major and looking at all that. It just looks like a cat walked on the keyboard to me...

      Are you reading slashdot as some kind of anthropological study?

  4. Reimann? by areusche · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reimann? Like the Noodles right?

  5. Hmmm.... by Otter · · Score: 5, Funny
    The only part of it I understood was:

    The author is grateful to J.-P. Gabardo, L. de Branges, J. Vaaler, B. Conrey, and D. Cardon who have obtained academic positions in that order for him during his difficult times of finding a job.

    Sounds about par for the course for academic hiring, and it sounds like he's still pretty traumatized from it. I hope this works out for him and he can go around flipping off all the hiring committees who turned him down.

    1. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I had a history professor tell me that if he knew how hard it would be to get to where he was, he never would have been a history major.

      Well, that's all in the past now.

  6. Math = $$ by RabidMoose · · Score: 5, Funny

    According to the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_hypothesis wikipedia article, this means $1,000,000 if the proof turns out to be valid. Unfortunately, I didn't understand anything else in that article.

  7. Oblig. by JuanCarlosII · · Score: 5, Funny
  8. Re:not so fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah. arXiv once published my paper that shows cases where P = NP; I proved it conclusively for the cases where P = 0 and/or N = 1, but so far I haven't gotten my $1,000,000.00 check from the Clay Math Institute.

  9. Numb3rs by netsavior · · Score: 5, Funny

    Charles Eppes: Imagine you have an infinite number of plot holes, and you want to test how they compare to imaginary numbers. The Riemann Hypothesis states that I can use the zeros in this formula to predict how bullets will bounce off of concrete to a degree of statistical accuracy that it will actually give me the social security number of the guilty shooter.

  10. Re:Try this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    your mother?

  11. Wrong by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 5, Funny

    "hellhole - nice."

    No, it's elohlleh, pronounced "elO'-heh-luh", which in the Primitive Quendian proto-language used by the early Elves after their awakening by Eru Ilúvatar, roughly translates to "a dreary, oppressive, or unpleasant place".

    Totally different.

  12. Re:typo by mcrbids · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Riemann zeta function is \zeta(s) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^{s}} [written for LaTeX], or "the sum of 1/(n^s) as n goes from 0 to infinity (increasing by 1 repeatedly)" [in more human-readable form].

    You have a slight typo. Should be: "... as n goes from 1 to infinity ..."

    You have a slight typo. It should be: "You have a slight typo. It should be: ..."

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.