Slashdot Mirror


Synthetic Molecules Emulate Enzyme Behavior

FiReaNGeL writes "Ohio State University chemists have created a synthetic catalyst that can fold its molecular structure into a specific shape for a specific job, similar to natural catalysts. In tests, the chemists caused the catalysts to twist one way or the other, either to form one chemical product or its mirror image. They confirmed the shape of the molecules at each step using techniques such as nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Being able to quickly produce a catalyst of a particular shape would be a boon for the pharmaceutical and chemical industries."

9 of 58 comments (clear)

  1. Yay! by nhstar · · Score: 3, Funny

    maybe it'll finally be cheap enough to ~cure~ things rather than just treat 'em.

    --
    --- no sig to see here... move along.
    1. Re:Yay! by Veggiesama · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why does everybody always say this, hinting about the possibility of conspiracy theory cover-ups and withheld cures? Why is it so hard to believe that some people actually are searching for cures?

      If a company develops a cure for AIDS, cancer, or the common cold, then it stands to reason that the company is going to make a lot of money. While other companies are bumbling around with "treatments" and "therapies," this company is going to make a lot of short-term profit, and with the help of a patent office (or whatever equivalent), AFAIK they'll retain that virtual monopoly for decades to come.

      And if you can count on capitalism for anything, it's short-term gains.

    2. Re:Yay! by maxume · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What's more satisfying: "we don't understand the disease well enough to cure it" or "those guys with more money than me are assholes"?

      What's interesting is that research into a lot of auto immune issues is actually starting to get somewhere, so we might actually start seeing cures for stuff in the next decade or two.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  2. Not just a boon, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It would be the holy grail. Things like converting glucose to ATP in the body achieve ~70% efficiency. This is absolutely insane. If the scientists could accurately model and design the tertiary structure of proteins at will then they could do things like making ethanol factories using minimal energy. This is extremely significant.

    1. Re:Not just a boon, by ruinevil · · Score: 4, Informative

      Things like converting glucose to ATP in the body achieve ~70% efficiency.

      Glucose to ATP using glycolysis followed by cellular respiration using the electron transport, the most efficient process, is only about 40% efficient. The rest of the energy is released as heat, which is good for warm blooded creatures like ourselves. In babies, the brown fat makes cellular respiration even less efficient, which keeps them warm.

    2. Re:Not just a boon, by TheLink · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah maybe someday we can upgrade to something we can adjust.

      90% efficiency when running (want to stay cool - stuff stops working well when the temperature goes up[1]), and 10% efficient when sitting on the couch watching TV - to stay warm and not get fat after eating all that junk food.

      [1] "muscles tire because they get too hot"
      http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/15.03/bemore_pr.html
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2354135.stm

      --
  3. a hint of deja vu by janneH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone remember catalytic antibodies - from 20 years ago - which also promised rapid engineering of "enzymes" for specific reactions. They were made by immunizing an animal with a transition state analog - under the theory that stabilizing the transition state would speed up reactions (since that is what enzymes do). Well, these "abzymes" completely revolutionized enzymology and biotechnology.....oh, wait...

  4. I have an idea for a catalyst by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 5, Funny

    How about a catalyst that takes CO2, H2O and photon energy and converts it into sugar and oxygen? Then we could use another catalyst to convert the sugar into alcohol. *Runs off to the patent office*

    --
    Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
  5. I'm skeptical by Sethumme · · Score: 5, Insightful

    IANAC, but TFA seems to overstate the find and contains several misleading statements.

    First, they cannot "quickly produce a catalyst of a particular shape," but rather they are able to take one molecule and make it twist into either of two orientations. This isn't the holy grail of catalyst molecular engineering (to "give scientists a quick and easy way to get the catalyst that they want"); rather, it gives scientists a couple 'bonus' molecular shapes for each catalyst they synthesize. There is no indication that the ability to twist synthetic molecules means that scientists will have a significantly easier time discovering new catalysts that conform to the necessary shape. As TFA says, "[d]espite decades of research, scientists aren't sure exactly how this kind of propagation works." Why should searching for "a catalyst of a particular shape or function," involve any less trial and error than before?

    Moreover, the scientists claim that "as long as there is even a slight chemical preference for one of the hands. . . . [t]he 'flexible glove' will find a way to make a better fit, and so it will assist in specifically making one of the mirror image forms." Yet there is no proof that this "chemical preference" necessarily results in the ideal molecular arrangement of the catalyst. In fact, trying to synthesize a molecule that is capable of folding into multiple useful shapes in response to specific chemical environments seems more difficult than synthesizing individual catalysts to each handle one function independently.

    Again, I could be wrong, but I think this is only a very preliminary step in making more advanced synthetic catalysts, and not necessarily a way to design them faster.