If you're mistrust is with the banks, how does using a cashless system avoid that? Now ~all~ of the transactions have to go through banks faster and more frequently than with cash.
Lately I find that, more and more, the mentality is "Either you're with us, or you're EVIL!" and this is just proof of that... Instead of presenting a divergent view, it's easier to plaster such organizations with hate and malicious intent, forgetting that the corporations are only doing what they're chartered to do: using every resource to increase wealth for their share-holders.
I'm not advocating that this is the way it should be, just stating that, legally, this is the way that it is. Corporations aren't ~allowed~ to consider "the greater good" over that profit, so long as they're not doing greater harm. And I mean actual harm, not just perceived or "being kept down by the man" harm.
If I read it right, the problem is that a number of users are having issues with installing Update 1 and have yet to find solutions... While that really is a problem, I feel that the headline here was meant more to get people bashing some more.
I was luck enough to get in on the first round of availabilty, and only had to wait 10 weeks to get it (only mostly sarcastic), and it's been a great unit. It's given me a platform to work on and learn far more about cross-compiling, working in a small(er) footprint, and generally programming in general.
Currently, I'm working to make it the core of a computer concept for my car. Will it be as good as stuff "off the shelf?" ~Really~ unlikely. Will it be a whole lotta fun getting it going? You betcha! And so far, I've only shelled out about US$45 for the Raspberry Pi and some wiring to get started on this project.
It will probably be the easiest long-term if you go in the same neighborhood as what your using in your dev/prod environment... If you're using RHEL or CentOS, go with RHEL, Fedora, or CentOS. If you're going with something from the Debian branch, stick to those choices (Debian, Ubuntu, Mint), or with Suse, go with Suse.
I've been a linux guy for a bunch of years (Started with RedHat, moved to Debian, but have tried all of the big players) and it's always the little differences (such as netconfig, default locations, service configurations) that annoy me when I wander from my comfy space.
Sadly, you may be right... but fighting for the freedom to speak by forcefully shutting down someone else's ability to speak (a la Anon.)..? Is that the right answer? I think that it happened to work out well last time without having to run around in a nerd-skills pissing contest.
I usually hate the idea of censorship, and arguably still do... but if this is designed to be an easy (or at least easier) tool for parents to use, then yes I think it's a good thing.
Once the rugrats are of age and on their own, then they can choose their own connection's ability.
There's actually much more to it than the tax benefits. Married couples have the legal right to speak for their spouses in things medically related. There are issues surrounding inheritance when a spouse passes, joint ownership of property...
Imagine owning a house for years with your spouse, making it a home, growing old in that home... Your spouse passes, then your brother in-law files suit because as the closest-living relative, he should inherit.
It's not just taxes, and it's not to stick the proverbial thumb in the church's eye. It's about fair treatment in how you live your life.
Taxes, when spent appropriately and for a good goal are not a bad thing. And no, I don't mean in the "let's cure the world from stupidity" way.
And, as just one small part of what that background science didn't help with, think on that the next time you use your microwave to reheat leftovers, or your GPS gear without having to pay subscription rates for the satelite signal...
Not really... At least not on the part of Time Warner, or not intentionally anyway.
Once the broadcasters got word of what they were offering, they told TW to pull it as they do not believe that this is covered under their current carriage agreement (the contract that lets a cable operator show content from a broadcaster http://www.fcc.gov/mb/facts/cblbdcst.html).
Agreed. It would be interesting to know if they ran the same test with the data service actually turned off on the phone. Then I'd start to see fault with the carrier.
meh... making it look easy only means that they were doing their job well, thus worth the money... Yeah, put the popcorn kid up there... he'd do it for less.
Assuming that you're trying this out on OSes newer than Win2k, powershell may make a nice alternative. You can use the same structures that you're familiar with in command and the ability to add more complex components when/if needed.
The Monopolistic abuse was the inclusion of IE and the mandating of its sole inclusion with every shipped computer/os combo. That has been enforced, and now manufacturers can in fact ship with Mozilla, Opera, or even Safari pre-loaded. How many do?
The analogy is poor, I'll grant you, but in no means meaningless. It's simply that you cannot expect to be able to buy a piece of modern hardware ~and~ have it pre-installed with an OS that is not the lastest offering. If Dell still had stacks of Latitudes from 2005, already OEM imaged, she could probably buy one and they'd happily ship to get it out of a warehouse...
As for monopolistic powers and enforcement; your whine privilege has been revoked. Go buy a Mac and tell them that you want it shipped with Jaguar. Or try Emperor Linux and ask them to load RedHat version 4.2 (and not RHEL, btw). How much would either charge if they'd do it at all?
Not true. Under the First Sale doctrine, you are allowed to resell your retail license of Windows as long as your sale includes all media and materials (assuming the manuals survived) and that you have removed all copies (running or backup) from your possession. OEM licenses are, in fact different as they were discounted based on the purchase being made ~with~ a specific piece of hardware. Dell subsidizes an OS that they bought in bulk from MS. No magic or mischief there.
Slashdot Mirror
If you're mistrust is with the banks, how does using a cashless system avoid that? Now ~all~ of the transactions have to go through banks faster and more frequently than with cash.
Am I missing something in this?
Lately I find that, more and more, the mentality is "Either you're with us, or you're EVIL!" and this is just proof of that... Instead of presenting a divergent view, it's easier to plaster such organizations with hate and malicious intent, forgetting that the corporations are only doing what they're chartered to do: using every resource to increase wealth for their share-holders.
I'm not advocating that this is the way it should be, just stating that, legally, this is the way that it is. Corporations aren't ~allowed~ to consider "the greater good" over that profit, so long as they're not doing greater harm. And I mean actual harm, not just perceived or "being kept down by the man" harm.
$0.02
If I read it right, the problem is that a number of users are having issues with installing Update 1 and have yet to find solutions... While that really is a problem, I feel that the headline here was meant more to get people bashing some more.
$0.02
*dramatic groan* (since I have no mod points) =)
I was luck enough to get in on the first round of availabilty, and only had to wait 10 weeks to get it (only mostly sarcastic), and it's been a great unit. It's given me a platform to work on and learn far more about cross-compiling, working in a small(er) footprint, and generally programming in general.
Currently, I'm working to make it the core of a computer concept for my car. Will it be as good as stuff "off the shelf?" ~Really~ unlikely. Will it be a whole lotta fun getting it going? You betcha! And so far, I've only shelled out about US$45 for the Raspberry Pi and some wiring to get started on this project.
It will probably be the easiest long-term if you go in the same neighborhood as what your using in your dev/prod environment... If you're using RHEL or CentOS, go with RHEL, Fedora, or CentOS. If you're going with something from the Debian branch, stick to those choices (Debian, Ubuntu, Mint), or with Suse, go with Suse.
I've been a linux guy for a bunch of years (Started with RedHat, moved to Debian, but have tried all of the big players) and it's always the little differences (such as netconfig, default locations, service configurations) that annoy me when I wander from my comfy space.
The symantics behind this are a little off... we fought with soldiers against soldiers... we did not destroy England to do so.
Now, Japan/Germany on the other hand...
Still, I don't agree with those methods either.
(poor sense of humor, but still...)
Sadly, you may be right... but fighting for the freedom to speak by forcefully shutting down someone else's ability to speak (a la Anon.)..? Is that the right answer? I think that it happened to work out well last time without having to run around in a nerd-skills pissing contest.
I agree with the message, just not the methods.
however (having just thought of this point once clicking "submit") it would be far easier, and less expensive to just have the parents, um... parent.
I usually hate the idea of censorship, and arguably still do... but if this is designed to be an easy (or at least easier) tool for parents to use, then yes I think it's a good thing.
Once the rugrats are of age and on their own, then they can choose their own connection's ability.
Actually, I'm sorry... but there is a pre-existing patent, I believe filed in either Italy or Japan on this method...
Someone will be by to discuss it with your shortly.
Honestly, I agree with this... I was aiming for the inanity of the situation, and was reaching *shrugs*
So, I guess amateur radio operators have been infringing since, what... the early 1900's? Voice is just data, right..?
There's actually much more to it than the tax benefits. Married couples have the legal right to speak for their spouses in things medically related. There are issues surrounding inheritance when a spouse passes, joint ownership of property...
Imagine owning a house for years with your spouse, making it a home, growing old in that home... Your spouse passes, then your brother in-law files suit because as the closest-living relative, he should inherit.
It's not just taxes, and it's not to stick the proverbial thumb in the church's eye. It's about fair treatment in how you live your life.
Taxes, when spent appropriately and for a good goal are not a bad thing. And no, I don't mean in the "let's cure the world from stupidity" way.
And, as just one small part of what that background science didn't help with, think on that the next time you use your microwave to reheat leftovers, or your GPS gear without having to pay subscription rates for the satelite signal...
just sayin'
Not really... At least not on the part of Time Warner, or not intentionally anyway.
Once the broadcasters got word of what they were offering, they told TW to pull it as they do not believe that this is covered under their current carriage agreement (the contract that lets a cable operator show content from a broadcaster http://www.fcc.gov/mb/facts/cblbdcst.html).
oh, but to bring back the original Hampster Dance!!!
*nostalgic swoon*
Agreed. It would be interesting to know if they ran the same test with the data service actually turned off on the phone. Then I'd start to see fault with the carrier.
meh... making it look easy only means that they were doing their job well, thus worth the money... Yeah, put the popcorn kid up there... he'd do it for less.
managers *sigh*
Assuming that you're trying this out on OSes newer than Win2k, powershell may make a nice alternative. You can use the same structures that you're familiar with in command and the ability to add more complex components when/if needed.
Someone find the house full of Popped Corn!!!
The Monopolistic abuse was the inclusion of IE and the mandating of its sole inclusion with every shipped computer/os combo. That has been enforced, and now manufacturers can in fact ship with Mozilla, Opera, or even Safari pre-loaded. How many do?
The analogy is poor, I'll grant you, but in no means meaningless. It's simply that you cannot expect to be able to buy a piece of modern hardware ~and~ have it pre-installed with an OS that is not the lastest offering. If Dell still had stacks of Latitudes from 2005, already OEM imaged, she could probably buy one and they'd happily ship to get it out of a warehouse...
As for monopolistic powers and enforcement; your whine privilege has been revoked. Go buy a Mac and tell them that you want it shipped with Jaguar. Or try Emperor Linux and ask them to load RedHat version 4.2 (and not RHEL, btw). How much would either charge if they'd do it at all?
Not at all: you can choose vista home basic, vista home premium, vista professional, etc etc etc...
Just 'cause it's a poor and/or overused analogy doesn't mean that it's entirely false.
Not true. Under the First Sale doctrine, you are allowed to resell your retail license of Windows as long as your sale includes all media and materials (assuming the manuals survived) and that you have removed all copies (running or backup) from your possession. OEM licenses are, in fact different as they were discounted based on the purchase being made ~with~ a specific piece of hardware. Dell subsidizes an OS that they bought in bulk from MS. No magic or mischief there.