Slashdot Mirror


The Microsoft Office Rental Program

LWATCDR writes "Yes, it looks like Microsoft is going to a rental program for Office. From the article, 'The software bundle, which also includes Microsoft's Live OneCare computer security software, will be sold at nearly 700 Circuit City stores for $70 per year.' Well I for one will be happy to stick with OpenOffice for now. From Microsoft's point of view it means a constant flow of money. For the customer it means you only have to pay a little each year instead of a lot every few years. I don't think this will save the average user any money and I wonder about problems with 'activation.' So will this fly, or will it give a big push to OpenOffice?

8 of 432 comments (clear)

  1. Bad description... by mark72005 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "For the customer it means you only have to pay a little each year instead of a lot every few years."

    The problem is more along the lines of, "this means MSFT can tax the consumer every year instead of the consumer using the same copy of Office they've been using since 97 or 2000 which still works just fine."

  2. OpenOffice.org, does renting work?, and old news by apathy+maybe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://openoffice.org/ has already been mentioned heaps of times. I won't bother saying anything more about it.

    This is old news, Microsoft has been wanting to rent software for ages.

    Two types of customer. The home user is used to renting software such as Virus Checkers and the like. Yes, it isn't really renting as such, but whatever. Microsoft really just needs to convince them that it's a good deal, and they are done. However, considering that many people don't have access to broadband (yes, not everyone lives in a city, and some people are still too poor to pay even if they can access it), I wonder how they will distribute the updates. Actually, do you get to keep the software when you stop paying? Previously it stopped working (you could only view the documents). Is that such a great thing for home customers?

    Business customers would probably love this though. At least some of them. Pay less, always get the latest version. Except they got screwed over with something like this before already, they didn't actually get a new version for ages (I can't remember the details).

    Oh yeah, one final thought, what about setting up your own server to pretend to be the MS server and say, "yes, you're a legit copy" to any software that queries it? And/or introduce a crack into the system so that it doesn't shut down?

    --
    I wank in the shower.
  3. Bloat issue by michaelwigle · · Score: 5, Informative

    This has been mentioned before but running on the assumption you aren't trolling I'll update you a bit. OO.o does still have some bloat issues (primarily during launch, once it's running it's very quick). However, you can turn on an option that loads a small TSR on boot-up which eliminates that lag. Admittedly, it's a bit kludgy, but to be honest, I'd wager MS only gets away with a fast start to Office because part of it's core is in the OS so it seems a fair trade.

    As a side note, the startup process has improved enough that I don't bother with the TSR on newer machines but for the very impatient it's a nice feature to turn on. Give the latest OO.o a spin and see what you think. It's still not fancy but it's a great workhorse, gets the job done, and is free. What more could you want? :)

    1. Re:Bloat issue by bheer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's astonishing how tripe like this continues to get modded up on Slashdot. First, modern 32-bit preemptive OSs don't do "TSRs". Secondly, Office hasn't had a startup helper since Office 2003. (OSA.EXE is still there but individual Office apps run it when they need to).

      Also, it's pretty pathetic to see the TSR excuse trotted out to defend OO.o's slowness -- it's pretty much the same excuses we heard when Seamonkey came out, i.e., ooh, Microsoft uses "s3kr3t" tricks to make IE faster. Today, Firefox starts pretty fast, thanks to extensive tuning and optimisation and no-one needs that excuse any more. What the OO.o guys should do is take a page from Mozilla.com's book and improve their own engineering.

      > It's still not fancy but it's a great workhorse, gets the
      > job done, and is free.

      When I need something that's not fancy and is free, I'll use Google Docs, thank you very much. Or (for offline) Abiword. Simply saying "try OO.o because it's not MSO" isn't helpful. Note that this is exactly like Seamonkey/Firefox: Seamonkey didn't get wide adoption because it was slow and unwieldly. Firefox gave users the same engine in a slimmer browser, and surprise surprise, it became very popular.

  4. Re:Paying for unnecessary upgrades... by jez9999 · · Score: 5, Funny

    At our office, we still you Office '97 because it does everything we need.

    Did you use Word 97's grammar check whilst writing this post? :-)

  5. Not only a constant stream of income... by chaodyn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now they can prove that the end-user doesn't "own" their software but are licensed, getting around first-sale doctrine and all the rights contained therein. Their lawyers must love it.

  6. Re:A "lot" every few years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know that for some people 150 dollars isn't a lot. Certainly not the 70 dollar rental scheme.

    I happen to live in Arkansas, an "economically depressed" area. Wages aren't even a fraction of what you see in New York, Chicago, or Los Angeles.

    People raising families think that 150 bucks IS a lot of money.

    If that doesn't convince you, consider all the people outside the United States. There are people in this world who don't see 150 dollars in hard cold cash in a MONTH.

    That is one of the driving forces behind open source (and piracy too,for that matter), after all. A hundred dollars IS a lot of money to a large majority of the people on this earth.

    If I had 150 dollars or more to spend on an OS even before I could consider spending another 150 bucks on an office suite, I would send that money to an open source developer rather than a greedy corporation like Microsoft.

  7. Good Idea for Certain Users by Admodieus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Included in this package is not only Microsoft Office, but also Windows Live OneCare among other services. Let's see how the math breaks down over the next few years:
    Traditional Purchase Model
    -Microsoft Office 2007 Home and Student - $150
    -Windows Live OneCare (with one year subscription) - $50
    -Next year's OneCare subscription - $50
    -Following year's OneCare subscription - $50
    -Microsoft Office 2009 Home and Student - $150
    Total for three years: $450

    Under the new Equipt Model
    -Microsoft Equipt (first year) - $70
    -Microsoft Equipt (second year) - $70
    -Microsoft Equipt (third year, includes upgrade to Office 2009) - $70
    Total for three years: $210

    Now, this is assuming that the user continues to subscribe to OneCare and eventually would upgrade to Office 2009 - however, assuming they do, the savings are pretty clear. Since this is being offered side-by-side with the traditional purchase model, I think this is a good move by Microsoft. Also, there is no alternative anywhere in the software universe that comes close to OneNote.

    --
    "It's a reverse vampire...they....they crave the sun!"