Slashdot Mirror
Bavarian Police Can Legally Place Trojans On PCs
An anonymous reader writes "The Bavarian Parliament passed a law that allows Bavarian police to place 'Remote Forensic Software' (Google translation) on a suspect's computer as well as on the computers of a suspect's contacts. They may break into houses in secret to install the RFS if a remote installation is not possible; and while they are there a (physical) search is permitted too. The RFS may be used to read, delete, and alter data." The translation says that RFSs may be used in cases of an "urgent threat to the existence or the security of the Federation or a country or physical, life or liberty of a person... Even where there is a reasonable assumptions on concrete preparatory acts for such serious offenses."
I think the bigger threat here is that they can break into your house without your knowledge and search it in secret. I guess the Gestapo taught them nothing.
Yeah, cause it's nothing like the PATRIOT act in the US
Um, "forensic" software is typically designed to *prevent* the alteration of data. Otherwise you can't reliably go into court and prove that you haven't planted the evidence. Last I heard, Germany still embraced the concept of due process...
Not sure whether this is a crazy law passed by some locals that will be struck down by German courts, a bad write up, or a bad translation...
If you encrypt your drive, and don't leave it running while you are gone, unless they guess your password not much they can do.
---- Booth was a patriot ----
in a court of law even if the trojan is programmed to download porn and other things over the Internet. I can recall American employers using trojans like that to fake employees surfing the Internet too much to fire them for it. "He surfed for porn for more than 5 hours each day, so he fired him" when really the trojan surfed porn and planted it on his computer. They do that sort of thing when they want to discriminate against an employee for their religion, race, color, national origin, disability, age, gender, or whatever. It is a way to avoid discrimination laws and civil rights, just fake evidence that the employee did something wrong and that is good enough to get a court to agree with you that you didn't violate his/her rights.
Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
If they are allowed to break in, they can install a hardware keylogger. Which yes, does run against linux.
The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
Symantec and Grisoft most likely are doing the spineless thing in regards to such tools already. I have a suspicion the ClamAV guys wouldn't have a problem with the signatures and even if they do third parties have ClamAV sigs now.
The Federal government has been violating due process and the US Constitution since FDR was in office.
Really? We didn't violate due process before FDR? I know you were trying to make a point, but what about Wilson? Lincoln? Jackson? Or Adams? How about Washington?
One might ask the same about birds. What ARE birds? We just don't know.
But watch: there will be abuses immediately (cops cannot help themselves, they have a compulsion to "fight crime") and in about 3 years one will be egregious and funded enough to make it to seriously senior courts. Then one of these (especially the EU) will seek to exert its' jurisdiction with a ruling like the US "fruit of the poisoned vine" doctrine.
Odd thing is, the bayricherbeamter are anything but stupid and may even see and desire this.
The RFS may be used to read, delete, and alter data.
So, getting this straight... They have the right to modify data in ways that can't be [reasonably] detected... and then they can use this data to press charges?
"Of course not your honor! It was different data we changed. The incredibly convenient file that says, 'I am guilty, it's a fair cop, guv! Oh yeah, it was me!' was there all along."
You're on incredibly shaky ground when you allow the police to manufacture information where they may subsequently use information to support charges. As soon as one dirty cop gets caught manufacturing evidence, you've devalued the entire method for gaining it. How long before the standard defense becomes, "My client has never seen that file before. Given the police routinely add and modify files on people's computers, prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they didn't put it there themselves and then change the logs to simply make it look like my client did it."