Slashdot Mirror


Asus Confirms Specs, Price of Eee PC 904 and 1000

Ken E. writes "Asus seems to have completed its Eee PC laptop line-up, at least for the time being. The Taiwanese manufacturer has now confirmed both specifications and UK pricing of the Eee PC 904 and Eee PC 1000 — its two latest models. The Eee PC 904 is essentially an Eee PC 900 in an Eee PC 1000 chassis (big keyboard, 8.9in screen, Celeron-M 900MHz, Windows XP) and will cost £269 inc VAT. The Eee PC 1000 will cost £349 inc VAT for an Intel Atom (1.6GHz) chip, 10in screen, 80Gb HDD and Windows XP. Looks like those early Eee PC 900 adopters (£329 inc VAT, initially) have been stiffed. Still, that's progress, I guess ..."

17 of 261 comments (clear)

  1. Stiffed? Wow. by Madball · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like those early Eee PC 900 adopters (£329 inc VAT, initially) have been stiffed.

    An early adopter "stiffed"? A technology buyer getting more stuff for less money if they just wait? No way!

    Next, you'll claim that man has gone to the moon, or that Linux >> Windows, or Bush is disliked. You so craaazy.

  2. Perfect by InlawBiker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Every possible combination of screen size, chip, storage and memory have been packaged and named almost identically. Asus' plan to thoroughly confuse customers is complete.

  3. How the 'Eee' got it's name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The CEO saw the margins that these computers would make and said 'eeeeeeeeeeee'!

  4. Progress? Conspiracy! by pla · · Score: 2, Funny

    Looks like those early Eee PC 900 adopters (£329 inc VAT, initially) have been stiffed. Still, that's progress, I guess...

    I know, right?

    Like that first IBM PC clone I owned... Can you believe I (or rather, my parents) paid almost $2500 for a crappy ol' 8086 CPU with 256MB of RAM???

    Bastards, just stickin' it to those of us who can't hold out for the $0.99 Walmart special on Quantum computers with a petabyte of memory and a sub-etha WLAN adapter! I say we sue!

  5. Re:Progress? Conspiracy! by jabuzz · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think that will have been 256KB of RAM, otherwise it would have cost a *LOT* more than $2500

  6. Re:Enough with the "I got ripped off!" whining by Romwell · · Score: 2, Funny

    Something better will come out for less money next year

    Surely, as we see the trend of Eee PC prices going down with each new model, this will happen most definitely. We can be sure that Asus will release a cheaper and not-so-beefed-up model for the folks that are waiting for the $200 model.

  7. Re:Stiffed? Wow. by maxume · · Score: 3, Funny

    Quick, buy technology product before it goes up in price!

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  8. Re:Stiffed? Wow. by __aalruu9610 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So wait...I realize your last comment was sarcastic. At least I know Bush is disliked... If I take a bitwise right shift of Linux, I'll end up with Windows? Holy crap...makes me want to try a left bit shift...

  9. Re:How much do those MS Windows licences cost? by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Funny

    $0?

    (rimshot) that's about what they're worth! (/rimshot)

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  10. Re:They may be paying for portability by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Funny

    What are you paying in weight for?

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  11. Re:How much do those MS Windows licences cost? by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 5, Funny

    You dropped this - http://www.instantrimshot.com/

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
  12. Re:Enough with the "I got ripped off!" whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Liar! I'm in Silver Spring, too. And it's overcast with occasional drizzle.

  13. Re:Stiffed? Wow. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's actually saying to take Linux, and shift it "windows" bit places to the left. I have no idea what that gets you.

    Well, it's shifting the bits to the right rather than left. If we assume that the Linux OS disk image is a single unsigned integer of magnitude around 8^(5e8), then shift that number right by a similarly sized Windows integer, then we always get a final result of zero. (Which would make the original statement False.)

  14. Statistical Analysis of price by sensei+moreh · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ok, so it's a bit bogus. Be that as it may,

    P = -342.27273 + 72.72727*Screen_Size - 0.45000*HDD_Capacity - 0.5000*SDD_Capacity + 4.00000*OS

    where:
        P = price (in £ with VAT)
        Screen_Size is measured in inches
        HDD_Capacity is in GB
        SDD_Capacity is in GB
        OS = 1 for Linux, 0 for XP

    --
    Geology - it's not rocket science, it's rock science

    --
    Geology - it's not rocket science; it's rock science
  15. Re:Stiffed? Wow. by mhall119 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, it's shifting the bits to the right rather than left.

    Oops, my mistake.

    If we assume that the Linux OS disk image is a single unsigned integer of magnitude around 8^(5e8), then shift that number right by a similarly sized Windows integer, then we always get a final result of zero. (Which would make the original statement False.)

    I don't understand why we're not getting modded 'Funny' like the GP.

    --
    http://www.mhall119.com
  16. Re:Stiffed? Wow. by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Funny

    Quick, buy technology product before it goes up in price!

    I'm glad I did, just try finding a 368SX16 nowadays, or a Tseng ET1000 even. My grandchildren will be glad I acted when the market was just starting.

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  17. Re:Isn't it hypocrtical by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    Firstly: No, it's hypocritical.

    Secondly: I think he was being ironical.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."