Slashdot Mirror
Asus Confirms Specs, Price of Eee PC 904 and 1000
Ken E. writes "Asus seems to have completed its Eee PC laptop line-up, at least for the time being. The Taiwanese manufacturer has now confirmed both specifications and UK pricing of the Eee PC 904 and Eee PC 1000 — its two latest models. The Eee PC 904 is essentially an Eee PC 900 in an Eee PC 1000 chassis (big keyboard, 8.9in screen, Celeron-M 900MHz, Windows XP) and will cost £269 inc VAT. The Eee PC 1000 will cost £349 inc VAT for an Intel Atom (1.6GHz) chip, 10in screen, 80Gb HDD and Windows XP. Looks like those early Eee PC 900 adopters (£329 inc VAT, initially) have been stiffed. Still, that's progress, I guess ..."
$0?
"Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
If you buy electronics, the price WILL GO DOWN in the future. This is not being "stiffed." This is reality. Stop whining. The fact that internet whiners got lucky ONE TIME with the iPhone is a freak occurrence. Do not expect your whining to every pay off for any of the millions of other electronic devices sold every day.
A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
You got that right: http://www.mobilecomputermag.co.uk/20080709673/the-asus-handy-cut-out-and-keep-guide-to-the-eee-pc.html
There are low-end but fully-fledged laptops (i.e. 10s of gigs, 512MB-1GB, 13"+ screen) of the OEM-unbranded type in this price range selling all over the Web in the UK. For 50 quid more, you get an Acer. And they all come with 12 month warranties, often extensible. Who actually wants the eepc?
I think the niche that Eee PC is trying to fill is for people who don't want the size and weight associated with the 13" screen. The Eee PC models have screens that range from 7" to 10", in weights from 2 - 3 pounds.
There are other options for palmtops and ultraportables, but they all seem to be quite a bit more expensive than the Eee PC models. I'm sure the competitors are justified in what they are charging - perhaps Eee PC has found the sweet spot of price and performance.
Well, the 80386 had a 4GB address space, so having a mere 5MB is easy. The 8086 only had a 1MB address space, so squeezing 256MB onto it would be a feat.
When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
I have a 17" LCD that sits, alone, on my desk... plugs nicely right into the 701, and poof, 1280x1024. :)
I'm sure the 40Gb SSD is much more expensive than the 80Gb HDD.
SSD is a premium. No sound, less heat, faster boots, longer battery life.
load "linux",8,1
For those of us on the other side of the pond, that's about $529.66 and $687.18 respectively, using yesterday's exchange rate (i.e., the first one I found)
If I had a nickel for every time I had a nickel, I'd be richcursive!
There's nothing that surprising about the 20GB and 40GB SSDs - they're not exactly the super high speed ones you see selling for thousands, they're just the same memory as the SD cards or USB keys you see selling for next to nothing. They're not as cheap as spinning discs, hence the 80GB one and a Windows license being the same price as the 40GB drive alone, but they aren't an enormous distance off.
Why are you 'upset' about the higher spec on the Linux versions? I guess they could've offered the same spec for less money, but the volume cost of a Windows license probably isn't that much, so I doubt it would have been very significant.
Interesting. Jupiter's gravity is only about 2.5x Earth's. so a 2lb Laptop would only be about 5lb there.
No, with DVI-I. While it's bulkier (and more sturdy), thanks to carrying the VGA signal as well it doesn't have HDMI's (sometimes show-stopping) disadvantage of being unable to drive the still most common projectors with analog inputs.
That's just pitiful. IMO, even 12" screens ought to be higher-res than that nowadays (mine is 1400x1050).
"[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz
With the 901 at least, the Linux model has 20GB of flash, while the WinXP model has 12GB.
"I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
I recently took my OLPC on a trip to Japan, and it worked very well. I could read the New York Times on the browser, get my gmail, and ssh into my workstation to keep jobs going. And it was solid enough that I didn't worry about throwing it into my luggage. The downside is that it is a bit heavier than the eee.
duke out
We can get an Intel D945GCLF Little Falls Mainboard with a built-in Atom 1.6 GHz for 80$, 512MB RAM for around 15$. An external brand-name keyboard is only worth 15$, a 9" screen is probably only 50$ (if we go LVDS or whatever direct connections are called), a battery shouldn't be more than 20$ and we can buy 4GB CompactFlash cards for less than 20$.
Since these are all retail prices, my question is: where's the 200$ laptop?
Meh. My 19" monitor does 1600x1200 but i'm running it at 1280x1024 'cause I can't _READ_ anything at that resolution. Not to mention yours is a widescreen resolution roughly equivalent, anyway.
How about the Elonex Onet+ then ...
It's Linux only because it runs on a 400MHz non-x86 CPU.
7" display. 2GB storage. SD. WiFi. 3 USB2 ports. VGA out. 3hr battery. 625g.
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/07/09/elonex_unveils_second_scc/
I do understand what you mean. I feel kind of the same way about iPhones: they're a cool toy, but 99% of the people who think they need one really don't. Still, that doesn't change the fact that some really do, and in the case of the Eee and other UMPCs, I'm finding that I'm in that 1%. I'm not going to trot out my resume to prove my geek cred, but suffice it to say that I know a bit about computing and that the Eee hits the sweet spot for me.
If nothing else, a tiny little SSH terminal that also supports apt-get is a sysadmin's dream come true. It's almost as portable (for me) as the series of Palms that I'd previously run through, has a much larger keyboard than any phone I've seen, and has a huge Free software library on tap. Those aren't big advantages for the general public, but dang, I like it.
I think there is a huge market for a device that sits somewhere between a fully functional (but small) laptop and a cell phone, but I guarantee that said device will boast the form factor of neither.
I'm not so sure. PDAs were neat, but generally too small to get serious work done. While I wouldn't want to use the Eee as my primary programming machine (and that's the main reason I mentioned for my once-a-month eMac usage), I've needed to use it that way for short periods. Maybe I'm just not creative enough, but I can't imagine something as generally useful fitting in a package too much smaller.
Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?