E3 Continues Downward Spiral
Gamasutra is reporting that E3 is continuing its downward spiral due to forced downsizing of the show and limitations placed on attendees. While this year's show will be returning to the LA Convention Hall, the size of the show will still remain artificially small, which some are saying is stifling the spirit of the show. "These changes have in part been made to encourage the event as a more useful business event, but most of those interviewed in TheStreet.com article are critical of its continuing usefulness. 'E3 had much more of an impact when it was a show,' comments IGN.com vice president of games content Tal Blevins. 'The video game industry is about fun and entertainment, and we should have a show that reflects it.'"
I'd like to observe that there IS a show that's fun and entertaining and focuses heavily on gamers and their interests. It's called Penny Arcade Expo and it's in about three weeks. With any luck, it will include 100% less Ewe Boll, and (not saying it isn't already) 100% more awesome.
It's Heresy what they're Becoming and whoever is responsible is a Ruiner and a Mr. Self Destruct. Every year brings us Closer to Hurt. I Do Not Want This. Why can't E3 just be A Warm Place again?
Piggy.
That's completely inappropriate for the internet.
'The video game industry is about fun and entertainment, and we should have a show that reflects it.'
I can drink to that. It a point that too often missed.
Something starts of small and folks like it. Word gets out that this is a "cool" thing to come to. It gets big. Marketing company/departments see $$. Next thing you know you find yourself paying for the privilege of watching commercials etc. No more fun.
Seems like a common enough death cycle to me.
If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
'The video game industry is about fun and entertainment, and we should have a show that reflects it.' Yeah they have it, its called PAX. http://www.pennyarcadeexpo.com/
I'd like to observe that there IS a show that's fun and entertaining and focuses heavily on gamers and their interests. It's called Penny Arcade Expo
That, and don't the people behind E3 put on E for All?
I guess he does not realize that there ARE some things boobs can't help you with.
Man would think he'd learned his lesson with BloodRayne, but then again... he IS Uwe Boll...
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
you must be new here
I swear it was advertised, several years back, that E3 was to be cancelled and discontinued completely. Can a spiral really go farther down than 'rock bottom'? If anything this looks like a(n albeit it slightly shaky) step up.
No, i just felt like making a completely useless, offtopic comment, and forgot to anonymize.
Gameshows, specifically the E3 of yore, was often loathed by developers (mostly large, well-known and well-established devs) because it took a significant time out of their development cycle. I don't have any specific quotes, but I vaguely remember Bungie mentioning after its E3 06 video that they disliked the "circus" because it took nearly a month out of their development cycle.
Shouldn't we, as gamers, be somewhat happy that these shenanigans aren't delaying our games as much? I'd rather have a game I'm excited about in my hands a month earlier, or have it be a month's worth more polished, than have a sneak peek at it a year before its released and half of the features in said sneak peek are cut.
That's not to say I don't think every developer hide their game til release - I think they should show some of it pre-release (for the fans' sake) - but on their schedule, not on some expo's. That way they can show the game when they're ready, not when society dictates.
Quod Erat Demonstratum.
everyone gets one booth per game. All booths are the same size.
They can only bring a hard drive. All PCs will be standardized and provided by the expo organizers and changed every year.
If developers want to come, it's because they have a great product to show off. If not, they can still book a hall to show a trailer.
That is a show that I'd want to go to. No swag, no fluff, no marketing, no half naked chicks enticing you to buy crap games.
The last night of the expo would be a big cosplay ball. Where the attendees can blow off some steam and have fun.
They're using their grammar skills there.
I'd just like to point out that this is a talking head at ign.com who's saying this. In other words, someone who doesn't have a clue, and sounds like he's been covering videogames for no longer than a few years. E3 was a business show, until it turned into a circus. There are plenty of video games expos that are about fun and entertainment, and, as many already pointed out, PAX is one of them.
E3 is trying to return to its business roots, and I say it's about high fucking time. GDC is for developers, PAX is for enthusiasts, and there is a need for the business side to have a show. Hopefully, people will forget about E3 long enough for it to get back to its original - and necessary - purpose.
Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
I thought there already a business-like event, the Game Developer Conference.
or just another annoyance, getting in the way of making money?
I was at the VSLive! Conference in San Francisco in April and they had booth babes. If a Visual Studio Conference can have booth babes, why can't E3 have them anymore?
Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon what's the difference? All steal money from devs and control with walled gardens.