The State of R&D At HP, IBM, and Microsoft
jcatcw writes "Computerworld surveys the R&D efforts at HP, IBM and Microsoft ($17 billion annually) and raises the question: Are these companies supporting more long-term basic research, or just the usual short-term, product-oriented work? HP is consolidating its focus on a few 'big bet' projects in five major research areas — information explosion, dynamic cloud services, content transformation, intelligent infrastructure, and sustainability. IBM has four 'high-risk' basic research areas — nanotechnology, cloud computing, integrated systems and chip architecture, and managing business integrity through advanced math and computer science. Many of the 272 research projects named at Microsoft Research's Web site are structured with major product lines like Windows, Office, or Xbox in mind, but many also seem to have no likely application to anything the company sells today."
Dear fucking god, my boss comes in at least once a week and asks me if our flagship app could run on cloud computing. Give me a gun and one bullet please.
...that $35 million line item in Microsoft's budget that reads "EVIL (misc.)"
Evidently, their lab's automated buzzword generating script is being tested.
For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
"So, what do you think of my program?"
"I wouldn't buy this."
"You wouldn't buy it, because it's designed for engineers."
"Engineers think the same as marketeers."
"If that were true, we would still be in caves wondering if rocks were edible."
"You know, you could keep recipes on this."
"We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
That's amazing. I mean, someday that groundbreaking research might even enable multitouch on smartphones. That would be awesome!
"Never mistake Success for Mission Accomplished" -- George W. Bush, private diary, November 8th, 2006.
You can't talk about Wikipedia's flaws on Wikipedia