Slashdot Mirror


Smart Parking Spaces In San Francisco

2centplain sends along a report in the NYTimes on San Francisco's smart parking initiative. He asks, "Any guesses on the when this will be hacked? Like, 'reserving' an empty spot by convincing a sensor that a car is actually parked there, or, perhaps using the wireless mesh network for some other purpose?" Quoting: "This fall, San Francisco will test 6,000 of its 24,000 metered parking spaces in the nation's most ambitious trial of a wireless sensor network that will announce which of the spaces are free at any moment. Drivers will be alerted to empty parking places either by displays on street signs, or by looking at maps on screens of their smartphones. They may even be able to pay for parking by cellphone, and add to the parking meter from their phones without returning to the car."

40 of 202 comments (clear)

  1. useless for women by William+Robinson · · Score: 3, Funny

    They know how to find free space.

  2. So long, thanks for all the gas. by wild_quinine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seems like a huge investment in a technology that probably only has five to ten years of life left in it...

    1. Re:So long, thanks for all the gas. by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean the internal combustion engine? I doubt it. Europe has been paying even more than the US right now for gas, and they all still drive. If gas goes up too much more, it will become cost effective to make the gas out of other sources. Still plenty of coal left, even neglecting all of the "bio-xxx".

      Even then, people would not give up their cars. I live in NYC and don't need a car, but in the 'burbs I sure would have bought an electric and put up with the crappy range rather than give up a car altogether.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:So long, thanks for all the gas. by cloakable · · Score: 5, Informative

      On the other hand, over here in Europe out cars get good MPG, so even though we pay more for petrol, we don't pay that much. There's very few 8-15 MPG petrol guzzlers over here. :)

      --
      No tyrant thrives when every subject says no.
    3. Re:So long, thanks for all the gas. by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Europe has been paying even more than the US right now for gas, and they all still drive.

      In many parts of Europe, cars are used for long-distance trips to remote places, often with the kids and a tonne of luggage in tow. The use of a car for the daily commute is very uncommon compared to the United States. High prices did spur better investment in public transportation in Europe, while in America low gas prices created a culture where everyone young and old thinks he needs his own car.

      A couple of weeks ago, a middle-class Slashdot poster wrote something along the lines of "Public transportation is cheap, but I prefer to drive so I don't have to be around poor people." I couldn't imagine someone here in Helsinki saying that. Everyone rides the metro, buses or trams.

    4. Re:So long, thanks for all the gas. by AmigaMMC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >The US market is beginning to more closely resemble the European market :) Really? I live in the States but I grew up in Europe (lived there 20 something years) and still spend 5 weeks there every year. Most cars do at least 40MPG with many going above that. My father's car goes over 50MPG on the highways... how's the US resembling Europe exactly? Unless by "beginning" you meant the real "beginning" of the car industry... like 1900 ;-) What's more interesting is that european car companies and oil companies divisions are more concerned about environment and smart us of resources than their American counterpart. I know this guy, the director of movie/documentary "Fields of Fuel" (coming out in August in theaters nationwide) who could get a same-day appointment with the CEO of Ford in Europe with just a phone call, but in the US after 77 phone calls he could not go through (regardless of having been promised he would get an interview). The CEO of Exxon (Esso) Europe also claimed that Environment and alternative fuels was their main priority and showed him what they were doing to reduce dependence; the US based officials... you guessed it, no interview. This film got awesome public critique at its premiere at the Jackson Hole Film Festival.

    5. Re:So long, thanks for all the gas. by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, but over in europe, the gallons are bigger...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    6. Re:So long, thanks for all the gas. by dkleinsc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Public transportation is cheap, but I prefer to drive so I don't have to be around poor people."

      That right there is the number 1 reason people drive rather than take public transit. (There are rationalizations related to scheduling, but that's what it really comes down to.) And that also leaves out another subtext, which is that the "poor people" they are usually thinking of are not white.

      By driving, a lot of Americans can practice a bit of out-of-sight, out-of-mind with the people in their society that aren't doing as well as they are. When you travel or live among poor people, your brain has to admit that poor people exist and are mostly decent folks who just want to make a living for themselves and their families. By comparison, if you live in a wealthy white suburb and commute by car, the only poor people you see are those who are working for you (making your lunch, carrying your mail, cleaning your office, etc).

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    7. Re:So long, thanks for all the gas. by phoenix321 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Poor people exist, but the sane poor people drive a poor car as well.

      I don't avoid public transportation because of poor people, but mostly because of dangerous, violent lunatics, who threaten people just because they're bored. Also because of stupid kids that have nothing better to do than scream and wave their mobile phones around.

      I am one person, and I absolutely love to have some dignity. I can not cure all evil in the world and I am oblivious to undereducation and whatever reason there may be that kids and youth these days just behave like wild animals.

      That's why I ride by car. Doors locked and concealed-carrying, to be exact.

      Compared to being in a cage with several dozen jerks, idiots and other obnoxious humans, even traffic jams are an oasis of pure harmony in the middle of the storm.

      Get the public space safe and clean and I will consider riding the public transportation again.

      Signed,
      A white male sick of paying taxes for people that hate me.

    8. Re:So long, thanks for all the gas. by phulegart · · Score: 3, Informative

      I had to re-read this paragraph...

      "I don't avoid public transportation because of poor people, but mostly because of dangerous, violent lunatics, who threaten people just because they're bored. Also because of stupid kids that have nothing better to do than scream and wave their mobile phones around." ...to realize that you were talking about public transportation. I don't know how, but I missed the first part. Everything after the word because fits nicely with driving as well. You know... road ragers... the lunatics who threaten people just because they are bored (or in a hurry, or mad at their spouse, etc.). Also because of the stupid kids that have nothing better to do than scream and wave their mobile phones around while they drive.

      But the assumption that public transportation is the same everywhere as that one bus ride you took that was full of escapees from the Asylum... that's just stupid man. The public transportation system in Portland Oregon is pretty fantastic. Now, in Vegas, the buses are notoriously late (quite common to see one bus on a route passing another bus on that same route, where they should be separated by minutes if not an hour). In Boston, the only way to get across the city is by using the T. Driving can take you 4 hours or more, while jumping on the Orange line in Malden, changing trains in Downtown crossing, and hopping the Red line to Braintree will take you half an hour total. In fact, if you want to visit Boston and you don't live near it, the best way is to park at the end of one of the T lines, and ride in.

      My experience with public transportation in Washington DC, Tallahassee Fl, Las Vegas, Boston MA, Providence RI, Portland Or, Milwaukee Wi, New Orleans La, and Dallas Tx has always been good. I've never been on a bus or train with screaming violent lunatics (of any age). This includes my cross-country bus trips as well as my cross-country train trips. And I've done several of both. So I've got more proof that public transportation is safe and pleasant, than you have proof that it is not. And I don't even feel like I have to carry a gun to secure my trip. But, with car jacking and the like, I guess it's not surprising that you feel the need to drive alone and armed.

      --
      "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
    9. Re:So long, thanks for all the gas. by amper · · Score: 2, Informative

      High prices did spur better investment in public transportation in Europe, while in America low gas prices created a culture where everyone young and old thinks he needs his own car.

      Actually, the low cost of personal transportation vehicles created an American suburban landscape where everyone does need his own car. It was a self-fulfilling prophecy which has been covered in more depth than I could ever hope to mine here. The active destruction of many of America's public transportation resources by General Motors was a major contributing factor which is also well-reported.

      If you haven't read it yet, pick up a copy of James Howard Kunstler's The Geography of Nowhere. Kunstler provides a very insightful account of the systematic failure of American foresight since at least the early 20th Century that has propagated at an ever increasing rate an unsustainable way of life from which there is no easy retreat.

    10. Re:So long, thanks for all the gas. by xaxa · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but over in europe, the gallons are bigger...

      I don't know why you've been moderated funny.

      1 Imperial gallon = 1.20095042 US gallons (only the UK uses gallons AFAIK, and only unofficially)

    11. Re:So long, thanks for all the gas. by Igmuth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most cars do at least 40MPG with many going above that.

      Which gallons though? 40MPG(imperial) is only 33 MPG(US), which isn't that that impressive. There are plenty of US cars that do that as well. It's just that many people in the US didn't see the need up till now, compared to Europe. I would say that's largely due to the very low gasoline taxes in the US.

    12. Re:So long, thanks for all the gas. by xaxa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, it's been a generation since you had to worry about crime in the three major mass transit areas in the US (Chicago, NY, Washington DC). During the early to mid 80's you might have had similar concerns but for the last two decades I can honestly say I would ride the trains in any of those cities at 1am with zero worry (perhaps a bit of worry after exiting at certain stops, but no worries while on the train).

      I can't speak for the rest of Europe as I don't know it well enough, but that's the situation in the UK: the bus/train is fine, if there's a problem at all it'll be walking home from the stop/station. I'd be interested to know whereabouts in Europe the GP is referring to.

      I'm male, I hardly ever feel uneasy on public transport. Women sometimes do (though, they never seem to complain about it, come to think, so I don't think it's a big deal). The usual advice (for anyone) is to travel in a group, have enough money for a taxi in case you lose your group and don't want to travel alone, and if you do then sit near the front on a bus, or in a carriage with other people on a train. Avoid being so drunk you aren't aware of what's going on.

      I've never heard of problems for Jewish people like that here either.

    13. Re:So long, thanks for all the gas. by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you ever get to the Midwestern United States, try riding a bus in Kansas City (Missouri or Kansas) at night.

    14. Re:So long, thanks for all the gas. by lena_10326 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A couple of weeks ago, a middle-class Slashdot poster wrote something along the lines of "Public transportation is cheap, but I prefer to drive so I don't have to be around poor people." I couldn't imagine someone here in Helsinki saying that. Everyone rides the metro, buses or trams.

      It's bad. Real bad. In fact, it can sometimes be downright dangerous. When I was attending college waiting for the bus, it was not unusual to see some schizophrenic homeless person going nuts throwing bottles around, cursing at everyone, and causing a huge ruckus. One time I had someone go through my bag. Other times they called me names. Sometimes they'd beg you for money, and if you didn't give them something, they'd start pushing you around. I've been physically grabbed after giving a homeless man $3. It was all that I had, yet it wasn't enough.

      My route to college went through the poor part of the city, so some of the problems were the result of the route taken. Look, let's be honest. If you're white riding the bus through a poor black neighborhood, you're going to be picked on, singled out, and accosted, which happened to me frequently. I was white, and they saw me as privileged--the great whitey keeping them down. I was not because I was rather poor. They shifted their anger about their situation upon me. When they weren't angry, they were hitting me up for money. After all, I was a "rich" white kid. I must be loaded. Surely I could spare a few dollars. None of that was true. I had nothing. On many days, I had maybe $5-6 to get me through the day and I had 4 buses to ride costing about $4 total, so ending with maybe $1-2 for lunch. When they hit me up for those couple bucks, they were quite literally bullying me for my lunch money.

      Now, remember. This was all before the gangsta lifestyle was popularized and idolized. I imagine it cannot be any better today.

      I will never ride those buses again and I'm sure many other commuters feel the same. I finished college a long time ago. I have a career now, and I have a car, which I will happily use to commute to my job, because public transportation in USA is simply lousy. There's no other way to describe it, and I will never forget just how shitty those public buses were.

      Now, with these problems it's usually the bus that's the worst. When light rail is available, it's better. The experience is somewhere in between the bus and a commuter flight. It also depends greatly on the route, time of day, and size of the city. I would ride light rail, but no such thing exists in the city I currently live in. Most American cities don't have light rail, so all you're left with is the bus.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
  3. Parking? by owlnation · · Score: 4, Funny

    Having spent many hours driving around SF. I didn't think there were ANY parking spaces, smart or otherwise.

    1. Re:Parking? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 3, Informative

      As a current resident of SF, I can assure you that there are, in fact, many parking spaces! They're just not anywhere you'd really want to go...

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  4. Ahh... "smart", not "Smart" by Kris_J · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And here I was thinking that parking lots were starting to mark out half-size spaces for Swatch Smart cars.

    1. Re:Ahh... "smart", not "Smart" by pimpimpim · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Almost every multi-story parking lot I've been to in Europe has Smart car places. There is a simple reason: extra income for otherwise lost space in weird corners, near posts, etc..

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  5. Great ... make everybody speed to the same spot by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This scheme will lead to road rage on an unprecedented scale. Every time a spot becomes free there'll be a dozen people making a mad dash for it.

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:Great ... make everybody speed to the same spot by Puff_Of_Hot_Air · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Pfft, we have this system here in Sydney shopping centres. If all the spots are taken, people simply cruise around looking for people leaving, same as always. Fantastic when it is only 80% full or so however.

  6. Pulas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Paying by phone has been a standard procedure in Budapest, Hungary for the last 4 years. Just send an SMS and there you go, another hour or so, depending on your SMS. Each parking district has its separate phone number, so there's no need for fancy high tech equipment, just a few billboards.

  7. Only few technical details by mattMad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would like to know more about the kinds of technology they are using. There are tons of interesting issues like the communication technology, security, energy supply, ...
    Unfortunately, the article does not provide many details so I looked for the web page of the company: http://streetlinenetworks.com/ - However, there isn't much more information to be found there either...
    Anyway, it will be exciting to see a real-world wireless sensor network operating on such a large scale!

  8. Japan by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Japan has something similar to this, albeit with parking lots rather than metered curb spaces, which don't exist to my knowledge. When you enter a dense commercial district, overhead LED signs show a map of the neighbourhood with parking areas colour-coded according to whether there are vacancies or not.

    --
    He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
  9. what a quote.... by Raleel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    âoeIf the San Francisco experiment works, no one will have to murder anyone over a parking space,â said Donald Shoup, a professor of urban planning at the University of California, Los Angeles, whose work on the pricing of parking spaces and whether more spaces are good for cities has led to a revolution in ideas about relieving congestion." - from TOA

    Wow... because you know, we all _have_ to murder people for a parking space now.

    That having been said, I've seen the start of something like this in an airport (Portland, IIRC). Parking spots have a light over then that shows green when they are empty and red when they aren't. Very handy to look down an entire row and know it's all full. In this one, you might be able to check for parking in the area when you get close and get over there, all on your phone. An interesting side effect of this is that the parking authority would be able to determine rates of fill and determine if they need to build a parking garage in the area.

    I'm sure it can be hacked. I'm also sure there are meter maids who can probably have an automated system to check that stuff, like one that says it's full when they go by and it's clearly not. A quick push of a button and it gets communicated back to parking central authority to fix it. Bear in mind, most folks are not hacking folks, so it's really going to be a small subset that ever need this treatment.

    --
    -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    1. Re:what a quote.... by mikeraz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, Portland has that technology. There are also signs at the ends of rows indicating how many free spots there are. A sign at the entrance shows how many free spots there are on each floor of the garage.

      It really makes short term parking at the airport nicer. You are effectively directed to a spot.

      Also...

      When crossing the bridges into downtown there are signs showing the number of open spots in each of the city run garages. Slightly helpful in choosing among garages in the general area you are going.

      --

      There's more to it than this.

  10. Doesn't Solve the Problem by camperdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While it sounds cool and all, I don't understand how this is going to solve anything. If people are circling the blocks searching for parking, it's because there are no spots, not because they can't find them. This system doesn't create more parking spaces, it just fuels a feeding frenzy. Right now, if a spot opens up, the only people that know about it are the drivers on that particular street. With this new system, the spot will announce itself to dozens of vehicles in all the surrounding blocks, and there will be a mad dash to get to that spot. It will create traffic congestion. What they need is to tear down a few optimally placed buildings, and put in some multi-storey parking garages.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  11. Isn't it illegal to use a cellhone while driving? by phorest · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Drivers will be alerted to empty parking places either by displays on street signs, or by looking at maps on screens of their smartphones.

    So let me get mind around this, California bans cellphones while behind the wheel but will possibly tie this to cellphones or even a confusing screen on your dashboard?
    When will the madness end?

    --
    God: When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
  12. NPR story: "Help for S.F. Parking Nightmare?" by 2centplain · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's an NPR story from April 23, 2008 on this topic.

  13. Re:Isn't it illegal to use a cellhone while drivin by Xtravar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The tickets they dole out will pay for the new parking system. It's a win-win situation!

    --
    Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
  14. Re: being near poor people by Migraineman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I strongly disagree. Public transportation in the US sucks because it doesn't go where you want to go, when you want to go. It works well for a very limited subset of the population that lives in high-density metro areas; it's useless for any task that leaves these areas.

    Now before you complain that I'm an apologist, lemme cite some facts. I took a flight from Washington National airport not too long ago. My plan was to take the bus to the Metro train, which would drop me at the airport. Decent plan, right? After a mile walk to the nearest bus stop, I stood there for 45+ minutes waiting for the bus, which didn't show up. At that point, I had burned my "extra" time budget and was in danger of missing my flight. I jogged home, got in my car, and drove to the airport. I passed the bus some 60 minutes after it was scheduled to make a stop. Why didn't I drive to the Metro and continue from there? Because it was a weekend, and the trains run on a 12-minute schedule. With the bus-delay, I was in danger of missing the plane if I missed the Metro by the perfect amount.

    Similarly, I *can* take public transportation to work, but I did the calculations, and the one-way time varies from 3 to 4 hours. That's for a 26-mile commute distance. Public transportation is coordinated at the local level here, so it's a horrible PiTA to switch across five different transport methods to get somewhere - bus, train, bus, different bus, etc. Schedules between municipalities are completely uncoordinated, so it takes maximum time to go anywhere. If you don't value your time, it's a wonderful way to burn through it.

    What's that? I should move closer to work? Unfortunately, my office is located in an industrial business park. There isn't a residential area within 5 miles. Further, even if I could make that work, I'd be a huge distance from everything else. The US isn't laid-out for a public transportation infrastructure. It's been pasted on as an afterthought, and it sucks. We'd need to make some horrific changes to install a useful transport network, and I don't expect that to happen in my lifetime.

  15. don't make the problem worse for bikes by burris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The worst thing they could do is replace the many standard parking meters with just a few kiosks or with square posted meters that are incompatible with bike locks. Then we would have no place to lock up our bikes. It's hard to get the city to come out and install bike parking (plus there are never enough racks) and the privately installed racks are usually useless (they buy racks designed by people who don't ride bikes and/or install them too close to a wall.)

  16. Let me fix that for you... by denzacar · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Add reservation option. Mark the spot as yours before you get there.
    Drive calmly to the spot, as central server knows how far you are from the spot and it won't start charging you for the time it takes you to get there driving at the allowed speed.
    2. Add red LEDs to the parking spot markers. Have them light up when the space is reserved. Have them turned off by sending a code from your mobile.
    3. Add option to report people taking your reserved spot. Have tow-trucks ready and waiting.
    Also have option to charge them for "stealing" your reserved parking spot, since you have already paid for it.
    4. Profit!

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  17. Most of that already exists... in Winnipeg by ubercam · · Score: 2, Informative

    Paying with a cell phone? Hell, we can pay by text here... in Winnipeg of all places.

    Many US, Canadian and UK cities are served by Verrus for paying parking in certain parking lots (even on street in some places, but not here) with a cell phone by dialling a number and having an account with them, easily setup online. Here in Winnipeg they also offer pay by text. The only other place they offer that is in the UK. I pay by phone Mon-Fri for parking downtown, and it's super convenient. Saves hauling around $5 in change and having to stop at the ticket machine on the way into the lot.

    Within the last couple years, the City of Winnipeg instituted a set of brand new parking machines, eliminating most if not all old on-pole parking meters. You can pay by credit card, coins, and as of at least May, by phone. You can even pay your fine online.

    What we DON'T have is the wireless signs that show number of spots free. In San Francisco, with a metro population of 7 some million, compared to Winnipeg's paltry 694,000, and a population density more than 4.5 times higher than Winnipeg, finding a space is likely a lot harder. We usually just need to drive around the block to find some, never mind the fact that the number of surface parking lots here is very high.

  18. missing the point... by acroyear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    add to the parking meter from their phones without returning to the car.

    this is REALLY missing the point of "max 2 hours" limits on meters. they were never meant to be a replacement for all-day parking in a garage. they were meant to be a way to keep commuters and all-day tourists from hogging up a spot all day, keeping locals and casual shoppers (and those visiting municipal facilities or medical offices) from having convenient access.

    by allowing someone to just casually "push a button" from where they are and hold the spot another two hours, they effectively have created a new commuter spot and while its nice that the city gets the money, it makes things worse for the locals who actually need access for only an hour or two.

    --
    "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
    -- Joe
  19. Re:car parks? by mikael · · Score: 2, Insightful

    SF does have underground car parks built as part of large office blocks. But the problem is where there is a mix of residential and business parking. They parking spaces may be free for residents between 6.00pm and 8.00am, but used for business during week days. It isn't practical to demolish a block of residential housing just to build a new car park.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  20. Re: being near poor people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    i think you also forget to factor in the fact that "transportation" decisions were taken at times when public transport was seen as a filthy communist ideology as opposed to the intrinsic individualist freedom loving automobile.
    There are people in the US who routinely drive 50 miles plus each way to their office...
    you made the decision for a variety of reasons(nice safe suburbs, better schools, etc.) stop bleating when your chickens come home to roost.
    Get out of your cars, or accept that they are part of a luxury lifestyle and earn more money to pay for it.

  21. Does it need to be hacked? by Simon+(S2) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Any guesses on the when this will be hacked?

    Why do you have to ask this yourself? Can't you live together, respecting eachother and use this cool new tech to live better? As a hacker myself I can understand that the first thing you would like to do is take it apart and understand exactly how it works to make it work in ways it's not supposed to, but "reserving an empty spot by convincing a sensor that a car is actually parked there" instead of respectfully reserve it the legal, correct and respectful way is just wrong.
    In an ideal place, where people respect eachother that would not be necessary. Maybe SF is not an "ideal place", I don't know, never been there, but you could try to make it become one by not hacking cool stuff like this, and use it the proper way instead.

    --
    I just don't trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn't die.
  22. Re:Leicester's already got it. by Damocles+the+Elder · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Traffic and roadworks" shows planned roadworks, and presumably accidents (none, currently)

    Good thing, too; if they were showing planned accidents on it I'd be worried.