Slashdot Mirror


You, Too, Could Be Batman In 10 To 12 Years

jmcbain tips a fascinating interview in Scientific American with a professor of kinesiology and neuroscience (and a 26-year practitioner of Chito-Ryu karate-do). The question was, how much training would it take for a normal person to become Batman? The professor says: "You could train somebody to be a tremendous athlete and to have a significant martial arts background, and also to use some of the gear that he has, which requires a lot of physical prowess... In terms of the physical skills to be able to defend himself against all these opponents all the time, I would benchmark that at 10 to 12 years." The problem is, even after that amount of training, no one could remain on top of their game for more than a few years. And "Batman can't really afford to lose. Losing means death — or at least not being able to be Batman anymore."

9 of 493 comments (clear)

  1. How many years for the morals? by Scotteh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    10 to 12 years for the physical training, but Batman was more than physical ability. He was in a position to determine right and wrong. That takes a lot longer to learn and not everyone is capable of such a task.

  2. Oh he'd stay on top of his game by bigattichouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Staying on top of his game is all part of his psychosis. If you hadn't noticed, he's a bit of a whackjob himself.

    --
    meh
  3. its pop science by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    pop science is important. it is a gateway to serious science for many youngsters and average joes

    you are dismayed it does not feature serious science

    ok, so go read something else

    why the hate for a magazine of pop science?

    it serves a valuable function. are you angry that some obscure technical journal is not popular? so why are you angry that a piece of pop science is doing what a piece of pop science must do?

    if it is serious science, it is relegated to obscurity, as a rule. because it needs to be digested for the masses, where anything popular takes place

    why don't you understand this?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  4. It's more than physical ability and big money... by jvp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, the character has an almost super-human physique. And yes, he's got a big pile 'o cash that helps him afford the toys and tools he uses during his "night job". But there's more to it.

    Wayne can out-think any of his opponents. His schtick is that he's 5-10 steps ahead of anyone. If he gets into a fight, he's already out-thought the opponent and knows exactly how the fight's going to end.

    That's harder to teach. You could work someone for years so that they're at the peak of physical ability, and then dump a cubic f'load of cash on top of them. But they'd still be missing that keen tactical mind that Wayne has.

    --
    Jason Van Patten
  5. Re:I trained in Kung Fu for 6 years by dino2gnt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When you find yourself in a fair fight, it's time to reevaluate your tactics.

    --
    Future events such as these may affect you in the future!
  6. Become a super villain instead! by Techguy666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That just takes a spray of acid to the face or a dunk in a chemical vat. No training time whatsoever.

    On another note, I get peeved by everyone ignoring Batman's "World's Greatest Detective" moniker and generally accepted reputation as one of DC Universe's smartest humans. Everyone focuses on Batman's physical skills where, in "reality", having keen observational skills and an intellect allowing superior strategems probably alleviates a lot of the need for ultimate physical skills.

  7. Glad I don't read slashdot by iwein · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Looking at Scientific American articles from even fifty years ago, let alone a century, shows how sadly dumbed down the magazine has become. It used to target a readership of average citizens who were keen on the nitty-gritty of scientific developments. Now it all flash and no substance, little different from Popular Science. The lesson American media teaches us: nothing good is every ultimately profitable as is.

    Looking at /. from even 5 years ago, let alone 10, shows you how lame it has become. It used to be about news for nerds and stuff that matters, now it is just about wannabe nerds whining about Popular Science. The lesson: making useful comments ultimately ever informative as if.

    --
    Show a man some news, distract him for an hour. Show a man some mod points, distract him for the rest of his life.
  8. Re:Where do we sign up? by ottothecow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It would add to the conversation if he included pictures

    --
    Bottles.
  9. Re:I trained in Kung Fu for 6 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One of the best lessons I learned in martial arts is there are two kinds of fights, those you fight dirty and those you lose.